WILLIAM BLAKE�S AESTHETICS IN THE MYTH OF THE ANCIENT BRITONS

G. Dimitrakopoulou
{"title":"WILLIAM BLAKE�S AESTHETICS IN THE MYTH OF THE ANCIENT BRITONS","authors":"G. Dimitrakopoulou","doi":"10.35603/sws.iscah.2022/s10.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"William Blake�s aesthetic vision of the secular world is based on divine inspiration. In the myth of The Ancient Britons, he discusses the three aesthetic categories of the sublime, the beautiful and the ugly. These establish his theory of art, which is based on Jesus the Imagination. The sublime, the beautiful and the ugly are forms indicative of gradations of divine influx in every individual. In this sense, the myth explicitly describes and distinguishes the three aesthetic categories that shape the secular and eternal human existence. It also concerns art and the role of the artist. Art is imagination and communication, and the artist is the inhabitant of that happy country of Eden. [1]. The artist is motivated by creative imagination, whose aesthetic quest starts from divine inspiration and ends in eternity. The true artist is the man of imagination, the poetic genius and the visionary aesthete. For Blake, imagination is a sublime force, the major aesthetic category of his vision and relates to the Strong man of The Ancient Britons. In addition, beauty is a distinct aesthetic category essential and supplementary to the formation of the Sublime of Imagination, Jesus incarnated, the archetype of Blake�s Strong man. He [Blake] distinguishes the three aesthetic categories of the sublime, the beautiful and the ugly by their actions, which define man. As he claims: �The Beautiful man acts from duty, whereas The Strong man acts from conscious superiority, and The Ugly man acts from love of carnage.� [2]. \nStarting from the conviction that antiquity and classical art provided obsolete models for emulation, Blake concluded that since the mathematic form is not art, it should not be the rule of the English eighteenth century art. Gothic, which is the living form, represents the union of the secular and divine worlds. The gothic artistic style is the incarnated Jesus, the Sublime of Imagination, Blake�s aesthetic apex, that is the supreme aesthetic category of his vision. The sublime and the beautiful are not contraries. They are supplementary aesthetic forms which contribute to the understanding of art. Beauty and intellectuality identify. Moreover, beauty is the power, the energizer of the true artist. Who is the human sublime? He is �The Strong man� who acts from conscious superiority, according to the divine decrees and the inspired, prophetic mind. Who is �The Beautiful man�? He is the man who acts from duty. Lastly, �The Ugly Man� is the man of war, aggressive, he/she acts from love of carnage, approaching to the beast in features and form, with a unique characteristic, that is the incapability of intellect. [3]. \nUndoubtedly, Blake�s aesthetic vision presents many difficulties in interpretation. In my opinion, the sublime is not an aesthetic category and/or a mere value that Blake uses randomly without artistic reference. His aestheticism is secular and aspiring to perfection. The secular sublime, which describes the fallen human state, suggests the masculine and feminine experience of the Fall. Consequently, the human situation appears doomed and irredeemable. \nIf the sublime is the masculine and pathos the feminine forms, Blake assumes that the inevitability of reasoning and suppression of desire, whose origin is energy, brings about their separation and incompleteness. In a non-communicative intercourse, the sublime (masculine) and the beautiful (pathos) are apart. These are the fallen state�s consequences. As the masculine and feminine are not contraries but supplementary forms, so the sublime and pathos are potentially integrated entities. In eternity, the sublime and pathos are joined in an intellectual androgynous form. This theoretical idea is the core of Blake�s aesthetic �theory�. In fact, his aesthetic realism does not overlap his aesthetic idealism. He is optimistic, despite Urizen�s - reason�s predominance. The artist is the model of human salvation. Imagination is a redemptive force, �Exuberance is Beauty�, and the incapability of intellect is �The Ugly Man�. The three classes of men, the elect, the redeemed and the reprobate juxtapose to the sublime, beautiful and ugly. These are restored to their true forms and their qualities are reinstated in infinity. All human forms are redeemable states, not static but progressive, even if their fulfilment on earth is improbable.","PeriodicalId":187162,"journal":{"name":"SWS International Scientific Conferences on ART and HUMANITIES - ISCAH","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SWS International Scientific Conferences on ART and HUMANITIES - ISCAH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscah.2022/s10.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

William Blake�s aesthetic vision of the secular world is based on divine inspiration. In the myth of The Ancient Britons, he discusses the three aesthetic categories of the sublime, the beautiful and the ugly. These establish his theory of art, which is based on Jesus the Imagination. The sublime, the beautiful and the ugly are forms indicative of gradations of divine influx in every individual. In this sense, the myth explicitly describes and distinguishes the three aesthetic categories that shape the secular and eternal human existence. It also concerns art and the role of the artist. Art is imagination and communication, and the artist is the inhabitant of that happy country of Eden. [1]. The artist is motivated by creative imagination, whose aesthetic quest starts from divine inspiration and ends in eternity. The true artist is the man of imagination, the poetic genius and the visionary aesthete. For Blake, imagination is a sublime force, the major aesthetic category of his vision and relates to the Strong man of The Ancient Britons. In addition, beauty is a distinct aesthetic category essential and supplementary to the formation of the Sublime of Imagination, Jesus incarnated, the archetype of Blake�s Strong man. He [Blake] distinguishes the three aesthetic categories of the sublime, the beautiful and the ugly by their actions, which define man. As he claims: �The Beautiful man acts from duty, whereas The Strong man acts from conscious superiority, and The Ugly man acts from love of carnage.� [2]. Starting from the conviction that antiquity and classical art provided obsolete models for emulation, Blake concluded that since the mathematic form is not art, it should not be the rule of the English eighteenth century art. Gothic, which is the living form, represents the union of the secular and divine worlds. The gothic artistic style is the incarnated Jesus, the Sublime of Imagination, Blake�s aesthetic apex, that is the supreme aesthetic category of his vision. The sublime and the beautiful are not contraries. They are supplementary aesthetic forms which contribute to the understanding of art. Beauty and intellectuality identify. Moreover, beauty is the power, the energizer of the true artist. Who is the human sublime? He is �The Strong man� who acts from conscious superiority, according to the divine decrees and the inspired, prophetic mind. Who is �The Beautiful man�? He is the man who acts from duty. Lastly, �The Ugly Man� is the man of war, aggressive, he/she acts from love of carnage, approaching to the beast in features and form, with a unique characteristic, that is the incapability of intellect. [3]. Undoubtedly, Blake�s aesthetic vision presents many difficulties in interpretation. In my opinion, the sublime is not an aesthetic category and/or a mere value that Blake uses randomly without artistic reference. His aestheticism is secular and aspiring to perfection. The secular sublime, which describes the fallen human state, suggests the masculine and feminine experience of the Fall. Consequently, the human situation appears doomed and irredeemable. If the sublime is the masculine and pathos the feminine forms, Blake assumes that the inevitability of reasoning and suppression of desire, whose origin is energy, brings about their separation and incompleteness. In a non-communicative intercourse, the sublime (masculine) and the beautiful (pathos) are apart. These are the fallen state�s consequences. As the masculine and feminine are not contraries but supplementary forms, so the sublime and pathos are potentially integrated entities. In eternity, the sublime and pathos are joined in an intellectual androgynous form. This theoretical idea is the core of Blake�s aesthetic �theory�. In fact, his aesthetic realism does not overlap his aesthetic idealism. He is optimistic, despite Urizen�s - reason�s predominance. The artist is the model of human salvation. Imagination is a redemptive force, �Exuberance is Beauty�, and the incapability of intellect is �The Ugly Man�. The three classes of men, the elect, the redeemed and the reprobate juxtapose to the sublime, beautiful and ugly. These are restored to their true forms and their qualities are reinstated in infinity. All human forms are redeemable states, not static but progressive, even if their fulfilment on earth is improbable.
从古代不列颠神话看威廉·布莱克的美学
威廉·布莱克对世俗世界的审美眼光是建立在神的启示基础上的。在《古代不列颠人》的神话中,他讨论了崇高、美和丑这三种审美范畴。这些建立了他的艺术理论,这是基于耶稣的想象力。崇高、美丽和丑陋是每一个人的神性注入的等级的指示形式。在这个意义上,神话明确地描述和区分了塑造世俗和永恒的人类存在的三种审美范畴。它还涉及艺术和艺术家的角色。艺术是想象和交流,艺术家是那个幸福伊甸园的居住者。[1]。艺术家的创作灵感来自于创造性的想象,他的审美追求从神的灵感开始,到永恒结束。真正的艺术家是富于想象力的人,是诗意的天才,是幻想的美学家。对布莱克来说,想象力是一种崇高的力量,是他视觉的主要审美范畴,与古代英国人的强者有关。此外,美是一个独特的审美范畴,是形成想象的崇高、耶稣的化身、布莱克的强者原型的必要和补充。他(布莱克)通过行为区分了崇高、美和丑这三种审美范畴,这三种审美范畴定义了人。正如他所言:“美丽的男人出于责任而行动,强壮的男人出于优越感而行动,丑陋的男人出于对杀戮的热爱而行动。”�[2]。从古代和古典艺术提供了过时的模仿模型的信念出发,布莱克得出结论,既然数学形式不是艺术,它就不应该成为英国18世纪艺术的规则。哥特是一种活生生的形式,代表着世俗世界和神圣世界的结合。哥特艺术风格是耶稣的化身,是想象的崇高,是布莱克审美的顶点,是他视觉的最高审美范畴。崇高和美并不对立。它们是辅助的审美形式,有助于理解艺术。美和智慧是一致的。此外,美是力量,是真正艺术家的动力。谁是人类的崇高?他是“强壮的人”,根据神圣的法令和灵感,先知的思想,从有意识的优越感中行动。谁是“美男子”?他是一个恪尽职守的人。最后,“丑人”是一个好战的人,他/她的行为是出于对屠杀的热爱,在特征和形式上接近野兽,具有独特的特征,那就是智力的无能。[3]。毫无疑问,布莱克的审美眼光给解读带来了诸多困难。在我看来,崇高不是布莱克在没有艺术参考的情况下随意使用的美学范畴和/或单纯的价值。他的唯美主义是世俗的,追求完美。世俗的崇高,描述了堕落的人类状态,暗示了堕落的男性和女性体验。因此,人类的处境似乎是注定的和不可挽回的。如果说崇高是男性的形式,悲情是女性的形式,那么布莱克认为理性的必然性和欲望的压抑(其根源是能量)导致了它们的分离和不完整。在非交流的交往中,崇高(男性)和美(悲情)是分开的。这些都是堕落国家的后果。因为男性和女性不是对立的,而是互补的形式,所以崇高和悲情是潜在的整合实体。在永恒中,崇高和悲怆以一种智力上的雌雄同体的形式结合在一起。这一理论思想是布莱克美学“理论”的核心。事实上,他的审美现实主义与他的审美唯心主义并不重叠。他是乐观的,尽管乌里岑的理性占主导地位。艺术家是人类救赎的典范。想象是一种救赎的力量,“繁荣是美”,而智力的无能是“丑陋的人”。选民、救赎者和堕落者这三类人与崇高、美丽和丑陋并列。它们被恢复到它们的真实形式,它们的品质在无限中被恢复。所有的人类形态都是可救赎的状态,不是静止的,而是进步的,即使它们在地球上的实现是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信