Viability of the Use of Aircraft-generated Intent Data for Air Traffic Management

G. Saccone, R. Mead
{"title":"Viability of the Use of Aircraft-generated Intent Data for Air Traffic Management","authors":"G. Saccone, R. Mead","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As air navigation service providers (ANSPs) move towards trajectory-based operations (TBO), the use of aircraft-provided information is increasingly viewed as a relied-upon capability. The expected benefits from the use of extended projected profile (EPP) information in Europe has been cited as a major driver for aircraft and ground equipage. However, early trials using EPP intent information, while showing some promise, also highlighted areas where usage may be more problematic (e.g. shifting estimated times of arrival windows, Top of Climb/Descent, etc). This also coincides with studies on aircraft intent data performed at Boeing using data from both revenue flights and high-fidelity aircraft simulators. Providing information on the data types, their use in the aircraft, and therefore the data generation algorithms will assist ground system providers in integrating such data into their tools and capabilities. While aircraft intent information such as EPP and other data directly from avionics are definitely useful in enhancing ground trajectory calculations and predictions, there are a number of critical areas that must be further understood in order take full advantage of this data. This includes, at a basic level, an understanding of how the aircraft is being flown, how the avionics manages control of the aircraft, the purpose of the intent data produced on the aircraft (which is different from the purpose of use on the ground), what the aircraft and avionics are doing (or have recently done) at the time that the reported data is obtained prior to downlinking, and how all of those conditions relate to the data provided. These all have an impact on the quality and accuracy of the aircraft-provided data, and a ground system using this data must take these factors into account on an individual aircraft basis in order to arrive at a useful interpretation of the data. This paper will detail different types of information from aircraft that are both currently available and expected to be available in the near-to-mid-term. It will also discuss how flight management computers (FMCs) calculate and use information to control the aircraft, and how that data and its usage differs from how ground systems generally interpret that data. There will also be considerations given on how aircraft-provided data is used by ground systems, and for what purposes (e.g. can the data be used for separation). Finally, analysis and results citing real-world and aircraft simulator data from work done both internally at Boeing as well as from referenced external sources will be given. These will identify various situations that illustrate how interpretations of aircraft data may be misconstrued without some knowledge of the conditions under which the data was generated. The conclusions","PeriodicalId":405724,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As air navigation service providers (ANSPs) move towards trajectory-based operations (TBO), the use of aircraft-provided information is increasingly viewed as a relied-upon capability. The expected benefits from the use of extended projected profile (EPP) information in Europe has been cited as a major driver for aircraft and ground equipage. However, early trials using EPP intent information, while showing some promise, also highlighted areas where usage may be more problematic (e.g. shifting estimated times of arrival windows, Top of Climb/Descent, etc). This also coincides with studies on aircraft intent data performed at Boeing using data from both revenue flights and high-fidelity aircraft simulators. Providing information on the data types, their use in the aircraft, and therefore the data generation algorithms will assist ground system providers in integrating such data into their tools and capabilities. While aircraft intent information such as EPP and other data directly from avionics are definitely useful in enhancing ground trajectory calculations and predictions, there are a number of critical areas that must be further understood in order take full advantage of this data. This includes, at a basic level, an understanding of how the aircraft is being flown, how the avionics manages control of the aircraft, the purpose of the intent data produced on the aircraft (which is different from the purpose of use on the ground), what the aircraft and avionics are doing (or have recently done) at the time that the reported data is obtained prior to downlinking, and how all of those conditions relate to the data provided. These all have an impact on the quality and accuracy of the aircraft-provided data, and a ground system using this data must take these factors into account on an individual aircraft basis in order to arrive at a useful interpretation of the data. This paper will detail different types of information from aircraft that are both currently available and expected to be available in the near-to-mid-term. It will also discuss how flight management computers (FMCs) calculate and use information to control the aircraft, and how that data and its usage differs from how ground systems generally interpret that data. There will also be considerations given on how aircraft-provided data is used by ground systems, and for what purposes (e.g. can the data be used for separation). Finally, analysis and results citing real-world and aircraft simulator data from work done both internally at Boeing as well as from referenced external sources will be given. These will identify various situations that illustrate how interpretations of aircraft data may be misconstrued without some knowledge of the conditions under which the data was generated. The conclusions
使用飞机产生的意图数据进行空中交通管理的可行性
随着空中导航服务提供商(ansp)转向基于轨迹的作战(TBO),使用飞机提供的信息越来越被视为一种依赖能力。在欧洲,使用扩展投影剖面(EPP)信息的预期收益被认为是飞机和地面设备的主要驱动因素。然而,使用EPP意图信息的早期试验虽然显示出一些希望,但也突出了使用可能存在更多问题的领域(例如,移动估计到达窗口时间,爬升/下降顶部等)。这也与波音公司对飞机意图数据的研究相吻合,该研究使用了来自收入飞行和高保真飞机模拟器的数据。提供关于数据类型的信息,它们在飞机上的使用,因此数据生成算法将帮助地面系统供应商将这些数据集成到他们的工具和能力中。虽然飞机意图信息,如EPP和其他直接来自航空电子设备的数据,在增强地面轨迹计算和预测方面绝对有用,但为了充分利用这些数据,必须进一步了解一些关键领域。这包括,在基本层面上,对飞机如何飞行的理解,航空电子设备如何管理飞机的控制,飞机上产生的意图数据的目的(与地面上的使用目的不同),在下载之前获得报告数据时,飞机和航空电子设备正在做什么(或最近做了什么),以及所有这些条件如何与所提供的数据相关。这些都对飞机提供的数据的质量和准确性有影响,使用这些数据的地面系统必须在每架飞机的基础上考虑这些因素,以便对数据进行有用的解释。本文将详细介绍来自飞机的不同类型的信息,这些信息既可以获得,也可以在近期到中期获得。它还将讨论飞行管理计算机(fmc)如何计算和使用信息来控制飞机,以及这些数据及其使用与地面系统通常如何解释这些数据的不同之处。还将考虑到地面系统如何使用飞机提供的数据,以及用于什么目的(例如,数据可以用于分离)。最后,将给出来自波音内部以及参考外部来源的真实世界和飞机模拟器数据的分析和结果。这些报告将确定各种情况,说明在不了解数据生成条件的情况下,对飞机数据的解释可能会被误解。结论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信