Effect of Students’ Attitude on Environmental Factors and Green Practice (Reduce, Recycle & Reuse)
Musramaini Mustapha, Mas’udah Asmui, Sharifah Norhuda Syed Wahid, Suhanom Mohd Zaki, Saifudin Razali
{"title":"Effect of Students’ Attitude on Environmental Factors and Green Practice (Reduce, Recycle & Reuse)","authors":"Musramaini Mustapha, Mas’udah Asmui, Sharifah Norhuda Syed Wahid, Suhanom Mohd Zaki, Saifudin Razali","doi":"10.6007/IJARBSS/V11-I3/8974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Going green must derive from green practice. The green practice involves 3R process that focus on effort to reduce, recycle, and reuse. The recycle issue always became on top in the list, indirectly other effort reduce and reuse also important toward environmental concerns. Thus, the researchers found it vital to conduct a study on the green practice process related to 3R (reduce, recycle, and reuse) based on affective and cognitive environmental, also interested to assess the role of students’ attitude as a mediator in the relationship between the variables of interest. For that reason, 112 respondents were selected to participate and all of them completed set of questionnaires. The findings show that, only affective environmental and students’ attitude have a significant and positive influence towards 3R processes. In addition, students’ attitude does not mediate the relationship between affective environmental and 3R since the indirect effect is smaller than direct effect. This finding determine Universiti Teknologi MARA students are putting their efforts and support toward environmental concern. Thus, business industry and tertiary institutional may need to collaborate to start encouraging their customers move effort toward 3R process to support green practice. Introduction Going green is not just recycling all the products that we used, it involves more effort than this. Each person playing the important roles to maintain, sustain and protecting the environment. A study from Chua et al (2011) said the prospect of a green future in Malaysia is very bright, meanwhile pursuing green technology in economic and social developments not only helps to sustain the non-renewable fuels, safeguards and minimises the environmental degradation due to carbon emissions, it also creates a strong green economy and industry, in line with the country's vision as well as the rest of the world economies. The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 1 1 , No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2021 HRMARS 593 environmental issues have been brought into many discussions. Previous studies in entrepreneurship education also mentioned that emotions have received much less attention from researchers (Kurczewska et al., 2017) compared to cognition. According to Wolski (2009) several universities around the world have made commitments to promote strategies for creating more sustainable universities, through their teaching, their campuses and their management. Activities of going green held in 3R program that comprising activities of reduce, recycle and reuse. Even though the trend of sustainable development has not yet fully permeated to all disciplines, academics, and university leaders, many universities have become engaged in it (Lozano et al., 2013). Furthermore, trend in business have been seen having an increasing awareness on the significance of going green. Savolainen (2015) also stated in modelling information behaviour, the main emphasis on its cognitive dimensions while the role of which affective factors such as emotions and feelings has remained secondary. Literature Review Affective Environmental Affection is regarded as a subjective concept concerning both dispositional affect (personality that is more stable), specific emotion (intense and short-term), and mood (low intensity but lasting, resulting from stimuli) (Cardon et al., 2012; Kurczewska et al., 2017; Mustapha et al., 2018). While, affective dispositions can be defined as affective reactions that individuals display towards environmental deterioration (Hines, Hungerford and Tomera, 1987; Kals and Maes, 2002; Kollmuss and Agyeman, 2002; Fettahlioglu, Timur and Timur; 2016). In other words, affective tendencies are the state of the individual to be sensitive both to the environment and the environmental problems and to take moral and ethical values of the society into consideration while making decisions about the environment and showing responsibilities towards the environment (Roth, 1992; Fettahlioglu et al., 2016). Cognitive Environmental Cognition is a term for the process of gaining awareness in which individuals recognize and seek information. It relates to perceiving, recognizing, conceiving, judging, and reasoning. The cognitive construct consists of declarative and procedural knowledge. The difference between these two is that the first refers to the method of link the concepts together and the second is the abilities to apply this knowledge. Dieser (2015) mentioned positive correlations between pro-environmental preferences and scores on a knowledge test and negative correlations with egocentric environmental attitudes and knowledge scores. Furthermore, Bogner (2016) reported a connection between environmental attitudes and knowledge where positive relationships between knowledge and environmental perception were found. Meanwhile, Mustapha et al (2018) in their study has found that it is not hidden fact that environmental affection highly affected towards student’s environmental attitude compared to the environmental cognition. Students’ Attitude Attitudes about littering include feelings scepticism about whether littering is truly a deviant behaviour, if it seriously harmful to the environment, and whether it is worth mitigating (Keep Louisiana Beautiful, 2017). In one of public Malaysian university, mentioned the students’ positive littering behaviour was high due to lack of littering facility provided, followed by low littering awareness and infrequent campaign activities (Asmui et al., 2019). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 1 1 , No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2021 HRMARS 594 This is consistent with a previous study conducted in one of the private universities in Bandung, Indonesia, students still throw garbage carelessly even though in place there is garbage pit (Anwar et al., 2017). Therefore, those factors showed the affective and cognitive environmental affect the students’ attitude and 3R processes. 3R Processes 3R processes are not new for many citizens including university students. In Malaysia, the trash bins equipped with three different colours widely provided by many university campuses and colleges as to mainly facilitate students to practice 3R. In addition, consumers claimed that the less the facilities provided, and the more inconvenience felt by them in carrying out the process of recycling, the lower would be the participation in recycling (Latif, Omar, Biding and Awang, 2013; Asmui et al., 2018). Littering education has been taken place since the students were in kindergarten and primary schools. However, the problematic point of view of today’s generations is that they have the rights of limitless ownership without taking into account the responsibilities towards society and humanity (Astrom, 2011; Ashtankar, 2016; Asmui et al., 2018). This condition caused the efforts of government and university to achieve and maintain the cleanliness of campuses and colleges failed. The Relationship between Affective environmental, Students’ Attitude and 3R Affective learning in environmental education in relation to individual attitudes is significant and has laid the groundwork that environmental education helps promote positive attitudes toward the environment (Gardner, 1983). Findings on several studies have shown that there were impacts of affection on attitude (Carrus et al., 2008). Moreover, there were also studies on the impact of affection on green behaviours (reduce, reuse and recycle) (Meneses, 2010). Furthermore, some studies findings show a more significant impact of affection towards consumers’ green behaviour (Lee, 2009). Methodology This study is based on adapted questionnaire from the previous studies (Nameghi et al., 2013 & Ehsaneh et al., 2012) targets students at higher learning university as the sample. The questionnaire used is divided into two parts where Part 1 accumulated by four sections such as the environmental affective (five items); environmental cognitive (six items); students’ attitude (five items); and 3R (reduce, reuse, recycle) process (three items each), whereas Part 2 is a demographic section. The questions are in a five Likert-scale format range from 1 (strongly disagree) until 5 (strongly agree). The questionnaire was distributed and a total of 112 respondents completed the survey. The data analyses were conducted by two steps using IBM-SPSS AMOS version 24 software including descriptive analysis and structural equation modelling. First, analysis of covariance structure was used to examine the mediation model and investigate the causal relations between the main variables. Second, mediation test procedures used to obtain estimated value of the indirect effects and to test their significance by using standardized regression weight with students’ attitude used as mediating variable. The mediation occurs statistically if the indirect effect obtained is higher than the direct effect. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 1 1 , No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2021 HRMARS 595 Reliability and Validity Reliability and validity were used in this study through unidimensionality, validity and reliability to ascertain or evaluate the fitness of the measurement models (Zainudin, 2015). Zainudin (2015) and Hair et al. (2010) stressed that unidimensionality is achieved when the measuring items have acceptable factor loading for the respective latent construct and the recommended factor loading value for latent construct is around 0.6 and above, and all in one direction. Secondly, validity is access through convergent validity, discriminant validity, and constructs validity. Convergent validity is achieved when the average variance extracted (AVE) is at least 0.5, construct validity achieved for each of the fitness indexes, as shown in Table 1 for a required level, and discriminant validity achieve","PeriodicalId":333260,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/V11-I3/8974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Going green must derive from green practice. The green practice involves 3R process that focus on effort to reduce, recycle, and reuse. The recycle issue always became on top in the list, indirectly other effort reduce and reuse also important toward environmental concerns. Thus, the researchers found it vital to conduct a study on the green practice process related to 3R (reduce, recycle, and reuse) based on affective and cognitive environmental, also interested to assess the role of students’ attitude as a mediator in the relationship between the variables of interest. For that reason, 112 respondents were selected to participate and all of them completed set of questionnaires. The findings show that, only affective environmental and students’ attitude have a significant and positive influence towards 3R processes. In addition, students’ attitude does not mediate the relationship between affective environmental and 3R since the indirect effect is smaller than direct effect. This finding determine Universiti Teknologi MARA students are putting their efforts and support toward environmental concern. Thus, business industry and tertiary institutional may need to collaborate to start encouraging their customers move effort toward 3R process to support green practice. Introduction Going green is not just recycling all the products that we used, it involves more effort than this. Each person playing the important roles to maintain, sustain and protecting the environment. A study from Chua et al (2011) said the prospect of a green future in Malaysia is very bright, meanwhile pursuing green technology in economic and social developments not only helps to sustain the non-renewable fuels, safeguards and minimises the environmental degradation due to carbon emissions, it also creates a strong green economy and industry, in line with the country's vision as well as the rest of the world economies. The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 1 1 , No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2021 HRMARS 593 environmental issues have been brought into many discussions. Previous studies in entrepreneurship education also mentioned that emotions have received much less attention from researchers (Kurczewska et al., 2017) compared to cognition. According to Wolski (2009) several universities around the world have made commitments to promote strategies for creating more sustainable universities, through their teaching, their campuses and their management. Activities of going green held in 3R program that comprising activities of reduce, recycle and reuse. Even though the trend of sustainable development has not yet fully permeated to all disciplines, academics, and university leaders, many universities have become engaged in it (Lozano et al., 2013). Furthermore, trend in business have been seen having an increasing awareness on the significance of going green. Savolainen (2015) also stated in modelling information behaviour, the main emphasis on its cognitive dimensions while the role of which affective factors such as emotions and feelings has remained secondary. Literature Review Affective Environmental Affection is regarded as a subjective concept concerning both dispositional affect (personality that is more stable), specific emotion (intense and short-term), and mood (low intensity but lasting, resulting from stimuli) (Cardon et al., 2012; Kurczewska et al., 2017; Mustapha et al., 2018). While, affective dispositions can be defined as affective reactions that individuals display towards environmental deterioration (Hines, Hungerford and Tomera, 1987; Kals and Maes, 2002; Kollmuss and Agyeman, 2002; Fettahlioglu, Timur and Timur; 2016). In other words, affective tendencies are the state of the individual to be sensitive both to the environment and the environmental problems and to take moral and ethical values of the society into consideration while making decisions about the environment and showing responsibilities towards the environment (Roth, 1992; Fettahlioglu et al., 2016). Cognitive Environmental Cognition is a term for the process of gaining awareness in which individuals recognize and seek information. It relates to perceiving, recognizing, conceiving, judging, and reasoning. The cognitive construct consists of declarative and procedural knowledge. The difference between these two is that the first refers to the method of link the concepts together and the second is the abilities to apply this knowledge. Dieser (2015) mentioned positive correlations between pro-environmental preferences and scores on a knowledge test and negative correlations with egocentric environmental attitudes and knowledge scores. Furthermore, Bogner (2016) reported a connection between environmental attitudes and knowledge where positive relationships between knowledge and environmental perception were found. Meanwhile, Mustapha et al (2018) in their study has found that it is not hidden fact that environmental affection highly affected towards student’s environmental attitude compared to the environmental cognition. Students’ Attitude Attitudes about littering include feelings scepticism about whether littering is truly a deviant behaviour, if it seriously harmful to the environment, and whether it is worth mitigating (Keep Louisiana Beautiful, 2017). In one of public Malaysian university, mentioned the students’ positive littering behaviour was high due to lack of littering facility provided, followed by low littering awareness and infrequent campaign activities (Asmui et al., 2019). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 1 1 , No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2021 HRMARS 594 This is consistent with a previous study conducted in one of the private universities in Bandung, Indonesia, students still throw garbage carelessly even though in place there is garbage pit (Anwar et al., 2017). Therefore, those factors showed the affective and cognitive environmental affect the students’ attitude and 3R processes. 3R Processes 3R processes are not new for many citizens including university students. In Malaysia, the trash bins equipped with three different colours widely provided by many university campuses and colleges as to mainly facilitate students to practice 3R. In addition, consumers claimed that the less the facilities provided, and the more inconvenience felt by them in carrying out the process of recycling, the lower would be the participation in recycling (Latif, Omar, Biding and Awang, 2013; Asmui et al., 2018). Littering education has been taken place since the students were in kindergarten and primary schools. However, the problematic point of view of today’s generations is that they have the rights of limitless ownership without taking into account the responsibilities towards society and humanity (Astrom, 2011; Ashtankar, 2016; Asmui et al., 2018). This condition caused the efforts of government and university to achieve and maintain the cleanliness of campuses and colleges failed. The Relationship between Affective environmental, Students’ Attitude and 3R Affective learning in environmental education in relation to individual attitudes is significant and has laid the groundwork that environmental education helps promote positive attitudes toward the environment (Gardner, 1983). Findings on several studies have shown that there were impacts of affection on attitude (Carrus et al., 2008). Moreover, there were also studies on the impact of affection on green behaviours (reduce, reuse and recycle) (Meneses, 2010). Furthermore, some studies findings show a more significant impact of affection towards consumers’ green behaviour (Lee, 2009). Methodology This study is based on adapted questionnaire from the previous studies (Nameghi et al., 2013 & Ehsaneh et al., 2012) targets students at higher learning university as the sample. The questionnaire used is divided into two parts where Part 1 accumulated by four sections such as the environmental affective (five items); environmental cognitive (six items); students’ attitude (five items); and 3R (reduce, reuse, recycle) process (three items each), whereas Part 2 is a demographic section. The questions are in a five Likert-scale format range from 1 (strongly disagree) until 5 (strongly agree). The questionnaire was distributed and a total of 112 respondents completed the survey. The data analyses were conducted by two steps using IBM-SPSS AMOS version 24 software including descriptive analysis and structural equation modelling. First, analysis of covariance structure was used to examine the mediation model and investigate the causal relations between the main variables. Second, mediation test procedures used to obtain estimated value of the indirect effects and to test their significance by using standardized regression weight with students’ attitude used as mediating variable. The mediation occurs statistically if the indirect effect obtained is higher than the direct effect. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 1 1 , No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2021 HRMARS 595 Reliability and Validity Reliability and validity were used in this study through unidimensionality, validity and reliability to ascertain or evaluate the fitness of the measurement models (Zainudin, 2015). Zainudin (2015) and Hair et al. (2010) stressed that unidimensionality is achieved when the measuring items have acceptable factor loading for the respective latent construct and the recommended factor loading value for latent construct is around 0.6 and above, and all in one direction. Secondly, validity is access through convergent validity, discriminant validity, and constructs validity. Convergent validity is achieved when the average variance extracted (AVE) is at least 0.5, construct validity achieved for each of the fitness indexes, as shown in Table 1 for a required level, and discriminant validity achieve
学生态度对环境因素与绿色实践(减量化、再循环、再利用)的影响
同时,Mustapha et al(2018)在他们的研究中发现,与环境认知相比,环境情感对学生的环境态度有很大的影响,这不是一个隐藏的事实。学生对乱扔垃圾的态度包括怀疑乱扔垃圾是否真的是一种越轨行为,是否严重危害环境,是否值得减轻(Keep Louisiana Beautiful, 2017)。在马来西亚的一所公立大学中,提到由于缺乏提供的乱扔垃圾设施,学生的积极乱扔垃圾行为很高,其次是乱扔垃圾意识低,运动活动不频繁(Asmui等人,2019)。国际商业与社会科学学术研究杂志Vol. 11, No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990©2021 HRMARS 594这与之前在印度尼西亚万隆的一所私立大学进行的一项研究一致,即使有垃圾坑,学生仍然随意扔垃圾(Anwar et al., 2017)。因此,这些因素表明情感和认知环境影响学生的态度和3R过程。3R流程对于包括大学生在内的许多公民来说,3R流程并不新鲜。在马来西亚,许多大学校园和学院广泛提供三种不同颜色的垃圾桶,主要是为了方便学生练习3R。此外,消费者声称提供的设施越少,他们在进行回收过程中越感到不便,他们参与回收的程度就越低(Latif, Omar, Biding and Awang, 2013;Asmui et al., 2018)。从幼儿园和小学开始,就开始进行乱扔垃圾的教育。然而,当今几代人的问题观点是,他们拥有无限的所有权,而没有考虑到对社会和人类的责任(Astrom, 2011;Ashtankar, 2016;Asmui et al., 2018)。这种情况导致政府和大学为实现和保持校园清洁所做的努力失败了。情感环境、学生态度和3R环境教育中的情感学习与个人态度之间的关系是重要的,并为环境教育有助于促进对环境的积极态度奠定了基础(Gardner, 1983)。几项研究的结果表明,情感对态度有影响(Carrus et al., 2008)。此外,也有关于情感对绿色行为(减少、再利用和回收)影响的研究(Meneses, 2010)。此外,一些研究结果表明,情感对消费者绿色行为的影响更为显著(Lee, 2009)。本研究基于先前研究(Nameghi et al., 2013 & Ehsaneh et al., 2012)的改编问卷,以高等院校的学生为样本。使用的问卷分为两部分,其中第一部分由环境情感(五个项目)等四个部分积累;环境认知(6项);学生态度(5项);和3R(减少、重用、再循环)过程(每个过程有三个项目),而第2部分是人口统计部分。这些问题分为5个李克特量表,从1(非常不同意)到5(非常同意)。发放问卷,共有112名受访者完成调查。采用IBM-SPSS AMOS version 24软件对数据进行描述性分析和结构方程建模两步分析。首先,采用协方差结构分析对中介模型进行检验,探讨各主要变量之间的因果关系。其次,采用中介检验程序,以学生态度为中介变量,采用标准化回归权值获得间接效应的估计值并检验其显著性。如果获得的间接效应高于直接效应,则统计上存在中介作用。国际商业与社会科学学术研究杂志Vol. 11, No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990©2021 HRMARS 595信度和效度在本研究中通过单维性、效度和信度来确定或评估测量模型的适应度(Zainudin, 2015)。Zainudin(2015)和Hair et al.(2010)强调,当测量项目对各自的潜在构念具有可接受的因子负荷,且潜在构念的推荐因子负荷值在0.6左右及以上,且均为一个方向时,就达到了单维性。其次,效度是通过收敛效度、区别效度和构念效度获得的。当提取的平均方差(AVE)至少为0时,达到收敛效度。 5、各适应度指标的构造效度达到,如表1所示,对于要求的水平,判别效度达到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。