HOW DO L1 MANDARIN CHINESE LEARNERS PRODUCE L2 ITALIAN SINGLETON AND GEMINATE CONSONANT CONTRASTS?

Virtual PSLLT Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.31274/psllt.13269
Qiangze Feng, Maria Grazia Busà
{"title":"HOW DO L1 MANDARIN CHINESE LEARNERS PRODUCE L2 ITALIAN SINGLETON AND GEMINATE CONSONANT CONTRASTS?","authors":"Qiangze Feng, Maria Grazia Busà","doi":"10.31274/psllt.13269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates L1 Mandarin Chinese - L2 Italian learners’ production of Italian singleton/geminate consonant contrast. 30 Chinese undergraduate students that varied in their Italian learning experience (10 first-year, 10 second-year and 10 third-year) and 10 native Italian speakers took part in a production experiment. They read, both in isolation and in carrier-sentences, 5 disyllabic minimal pairs contrasting in consonant length. Durations of target intervocalic consonants and preconsonantal vowels were measured and converted into duration ratios for statistical analyses. The results show that the Chinese learners were able to produce short-long differences for Italian singleton vs. geminate consonants, though their duration ratios were significantly smaller than those of the native speakers. As for preconsonantal vowels, while the native Italian speakers alternated between short vowels before geminate consonants and long vowels before singletons, the Chinese learners did not distinguish between pre-singleton and pre-geminate vowel durations. Moreover, though the three groups of Chinese learners had different learning experiences, they did not differ significantly in their productions of Italian consonant length contrast. These results indicate that, for Chinese learners, the mastery of Italian consonant length contrast represents a challenge and that an increased learning experience may not help.","PeriodicalId":405918,"journal":{"name":"Virtual PSLLT","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virtual PSLLT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31274/psllt.13269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates L1 Mandarin Chinese - L2 Italian learners’ production of Italian singleton/geminate consonant contrast. 30 Chinese undergraduate students that varied in their Italian learning experience (10 first-year, 10 second-year and 10 third-year) and 10 native Italian speakers took part in a production experiment. They read, both in isolation and in carrier-sentences, 5 disyllabic minimal pairs contrasting in consonant length. Durations of target intervocalic consonants and preconsonantal vowels were measured and converted into duration ratios for statistical analyses. The results show that the Chinese learners were able to produce short-long differences for Italian singleton vs. geminate consonants, though their duration ratios were significantly smaller than those of the native speakers. As for preconsonantal vowels, while the native Italian speakers alternated between short vowels before geminate consonants and long vowels before singletons, the Chinese learners did not distinguish between pre-singleton and pre-geminate vowel durations. Moreover, though the three groups of Chinese learners had different learning experiences, they did not differ significantly in their productions of Italian consonant length contrast. These results indicate that, for Chinese learners, the mastery of Italian consonant length contrast represents a challenge and that an increased learning experience may not help.
l1汉语学习者如何产生l2意大利语单元音和双元音对比?
本研究探讨了母语汉语和二语意大利语学习者的意大利语单/双子音对比。30名不同意大利语学习经历的中国本科生(10名一年级,10名二年级和10名三年级)和10名母语为意大利语的人参加了一个生产实验。他们阅读时,既可以单独阅读,也可以在载体句中阅读,在辅音长度上形成对比的5个最小双音节对。测量目标中间辅音和前辅音元音的持续时间,并将其转换为持续时间比率进行统计分析。结果表明,中国学习者能够对意大利语单子音和双子音产生长短差异,尽管它们的持续时间比明显小于母语者。在前辅音元音方面,意大利语母语者在双元音前的短元音和单元音前的长元音交替出现,而中国学习者没有区分前单元音和前双元音的持续时间。此外,尽管三组中国学习者有不同的学习经历,但他们在意大利辅音长度对比的产生上没有显著差异。这些结果表明,对于中国学习者来说,掌握意大利辅音长度对比是一个挑战,增加学习经验可能无济于事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信