Comparison of Public Expenditure for Agriculture in Selected EU Countries

M. Pietriková
{"title":"Comparison of Public Expenditure for Agriculture in Selected EU Countries","authors":"M. Pietriková","doi":"10.15414/isd2022.s1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A specific part of each country's economy is the public sector, through which public services are provided. The structure of government expenditures in individual countries is different and the method of allocating funds to individual areas is also different, which is conditioned by a number of factors. The aim of the paper is to compare public expenditure related to agriculture in selected EU countries. The surveyed government expenditures are broken down according to the international functional classification COFOG. To compare the development of expenditures, whether total or individual components, the basic characteristics of time series are used. Based on the above analyses, we can state that the percentage of Total general government expenditure (COFOG) on gross domestic product in Slovakia (18.33%) has long been below the EU-27 average (19.10%). Similarly, the ratio expenditure of group 04.2 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (COFOG) in 04 Economic affairs in Slovakia 5.24% had a lower level then average ratio countries EU-27 (5.95%).","PeriodicalId":442624,"journal":{"name":"International Scientific Days 2022: Efficient, Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture and Food Systems – the Interface of Science, Politics and Practice. Proceedings of reviewed articles of international scientific conference","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Scientific Days 2022: Efficient, Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture and Food Systems – the Interface of Science, Politics and Practice. Proceedings of reviewed articles of international scientific conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15414/isd2022.s1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A specific part of each country's economy is the public sector, through which public services are provided. The structure of government expenditures in individual countries is different and the method of allocating funds to individual areas is also different, which is conditioned by a number of factors. The aim of the paper is to compare public expenditure related to agriculture in selected EU countries. The surveyed government expenditures are broken down according to the international functional classification COFOG. To compare the development of expenditures, whether total or individual components, the basic characteristics of time series are used. Based on the above analyses, we can state that the percentage of Total general government expenditure (COFOG) on gross domestic product in Slovakia (18.33%) has long been below the EU-27 average (19.10%). Similarly, the ratio expenditure of group 04.2 Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (COFOG) in 04 Economic affairs in Slovakia 5.24% had a lower level then average ratio countries EU-27 (5.95%).
欧盟部分国家农业公共支出比较
每个国家经济的一个特定部分是公共部门,通过它提供公共服务。各个国家的政府支出结构不同,向各个领域分配资金的方法也不同,这是由若干因素决定的。本文的目的是比较选定的欧盟国家与农业有关的公共支出。所调查的政府支出按照国际功能分类COFOG进行了细分。为了比较支出的发展,无论是总组成部分还是个别组成部分,都使用了时间序列的基本特征。基于上述分析,我们可以说,斯洛伐克一般政府总支出(COFOG)占国内生产总值的比例(18.33%)一直低于欧盟27国的平均水平(19.10%)。同样,斯洛伐克经济事务中04.2组农业、林业、渔业和狩猎(COFOG)的比率支出5.24%低于欧盟27国的平均比率(5.95%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信