Detecting coronary artery disease using SPECT imaging: a comparison of thallium-201 and teboroxime.

R M Fleming
{"title":"Detecting coronary artery disease using SPECT imaging: a comparison of thallium-201 and teboroxime.","authors":"R M Fleming","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty subjects underwent single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging with technetium-99m teboroxime (TEBO). Of these, 26 underwent thallium SPECT imaging and 25 underwent quantitative coronary arteriography (QCA). Twenty-one of the subjects underwent all three studies. SPECT images were reviewed by two independent observers blinded to the clinical data. Stenoses were considered significant if there was a greater than or equal to 50% diameter narrowing as defined by QCA analysis of the coronary arteriograms. The overall sensitivity and specificity was 78% and 78%, respectively, for thallium-201. The overall sensitivity and specificity for teboroxime was 72% and 80%, respectively. The results obtained for these two tracers were not statistically different. Some of the false-positive results obtained from teboroxime imaging appear to have been due to the 10-min acquisition protocol and can be reduced with the use of new software programs using a continuous 3-min acquisition and dipyridamole. Teboroxime's rapid biologic half-life allows completion of SPECT imaging within 60-90 min, compared with the minimum of 4 h required for thallium SPECT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":76992,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiologic imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":"20-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiologic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thirty subjects underwent single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging with technetium-99m teboroxime (TEBO). Of these, 26 underwent thallium SPECT imaging and 25 underwent quantitative coronary arteriography (QCA). Twenty-one of the subjects underwent all three studies. SPECT images were reviewed by two independent observers blinded to the clinical data. Stenoses were considered significant if there was a greater than or equal to 50% diameter narrowing as defined by QCA analysis of the coronary arteriograms. The overall sensitivity and specificity was 78% and 78%, respectively, for thallium-201. The overall sensitivity and specificity for teboroxime was 72% and 80%, respectively. The results obtained for these two tracers were not statistically different. Some of the false-positive results obtained from teboroxime imaging appear to have been due to the 10-min acquisition protocol and can be reduced with the use of new software programs using a continuous 3-min acquisition and dipyridamole. Teboroxime's rapid biologic half-life allows completion of SPECT imaging within 60-90 min, compared with the minimum of 4 h required for thallium SPECT imaging.

用SPECT显像检测冠状动脉疾病:铊-201和替博肟的比较。
30名受试者采用锝-99m硼肟(TEBO)进行单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)成像。其中26例行铊SPECT显像,25例行定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)。其中21名受试者接受了全部三项研究。SPECT图像由两名不了解临床数据的独立观察者进行审查。根据冠状动脉造影的QCA分析,如果直径变窄大于或等于50%,则认为狭窄明显。铊-201的总体敏感性和特异性分别为78%和78%。替博肟的总体敏感性和特异性分别为72%和80%。这两种示踪剂的结果无统计学差异。从特博肟成像中获得的一些假阳性结果似乎是由于10分钟采集方案造成的,可以通过使用使用连续3分钟采集和双嘧达莫的新软件程序来减少。teboroxme的快速生物半衰期允许在60-90分钟内完成SPECT成像,而铊SPECT成像至少需要4小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信