Combinatorial Inference on the Optimal Assortment in the Multinomial Logit Model

Shuting Shen, Xi Chen, Ethan X. Fang, Junwei Lu
{"title":"Combinatorial Inference on the Optimal Assortment in the Multinomial Logit Model","authors":"Shuting Shen, Xi Chen, Ethan X. Fang, Junwei Lu","doi":"10.1145/3580507.3597753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assortment optimization has received active explorations in the past few decades due to its practical importance. Despite the extensive literature dealing with optimization algorithms and latent score estimation, uncertainty quantification for the optimal assortment still needs to be explored and is of great practical significance. Instead of estimating and recovering the complete optimal offer set, decision-makers may only be interested in testing whether a given property holds true for the optimal assortment, such as whether they should include several products of interest in the optimal set, or how many categories of products the optimal set should include. This paper proposes a novel inferential framework for testing such properties. We consider the widely adopted multinomial logit (MNL) model, where we assume that each customer will purchase an item j within the offer set of products S with a probability proportional to the underlying preference score u*j associated with the product. For a full assortment of n products, our objective is to conduct a hypothesis test concerning a general optimal assortment property, given by: [EQUATION] where S* denotes the optimal offer set, and S0 is a set of offer sets satisfying the property of interest. We reduce inferring a general optimal assortment property to quantifying the uncertainty associated with the sign change point detection of the marginal revenue gaps defined as [EQUATION], where r1 ≥ ... ≥ rn are the revenue parameters associated with the n products. By plugging in the Newton-debiased maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the latent preference scores, we obtain the marginal revenue gap estimators [EQUATION] and show their asymptotic normality. Furthermore, we construct a maximum statistic via the gap estimators to detect the sign change point: [EQUATION] where [EQUATION] is a consistent estimator for the asymptotic variance of [EQUATION]. By approximating the distribution of the maximum statistic with multiplier bootstrap techniques, we propose a valid testing procedure. We also conduct numerical experiments to assess the performance of our method.","PeriodicalId":210555,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3580507.3597753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assortment optimization has received active explorations in the past few decades due to its practical importance. Despite the extensive literature dealing with optimization algorithms and latent score estimation, uncertainty quantification for the optimal assortment still needs to be explored and is of great practical significance. Instead of estimating and recovering the complete optimal offer set, decision-makers may only be interested in testing whether a given property holds true for the optimal assortment, such as whether they should include several products of interest in the optimal set, or how many categories of products the optimal set should include. This paper proposes a novel inferential framework for testing such properties. We consider the widely adopted multinomial logit (MNL) model, where we assume that each customer will purchase an item j within the offer set of products S with a probability proportional to the underlying preference score u*j associated with the product. For a full assortment of n products, our objective is to conduct a hypothesis test concerning a general optimal assortment property, given by: [EQUATION] where S* denotes the optimal offer set, and S0 is a set of offer sets satisfying the property of interest. We reduce inferring a general optimal assortment property to quantifying the uncertainty associated with the sign change point detection of the marginal revenue gaps defined as [EQUATION], where r1 ≥ ... ≥ rn are the revenue parameters associated with the n products. By plugging in the Newton-debiased maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the latent preference scores, we obtain the marginal revenue gap estimators [EQUATION] and show their asymptotic normality. Furthermore, we construct a maximum statistic via the gap estimators to detect the sign change point: [EQUATION] where [EQUATION] is a consistent estimator for the asymptotic variance of [EQUATION]. By approximating the distribution of the maximum statistic with multiplier bootstrap techniques, we propose a valid testing procedure. We also conduct numerical experiments to assess the performance of our method.
多项Logit模型中最优分类的组合推理
由于分类优化具有重要的现实意义,在过去的几十年里,人们对其进行了积极的探索。尽管有大量关于优化算法和潜在分数估计的文献,但最优分类的不确定性量化仍然需要探索,具有重要的现实意义。而不是估计和恢复完整的最优报价集,决策者可能只对测试一个给定的属性是否对最优分类是正确的感兴趣,比如他们是否应该在最优集中包括几个感兴趣的产品,或者最优集中应该包括多少个产品类别。本文提出了一个新的推理框架来测试这些性质。我们考虑广泛采用的多项logit (MNL)模型,其中我们假设每个客户将以与产品相关的潜在偏好得分u*j成比例的概率购买产品S中的产品j。对于n个产品的全分类,我们的目标是对一般最优分类性质进行假设检验,该性质由[等式]给出,其中S*表示最优报价集,S0是满足利益性质的报价集的集合。我们减少了对一般最优分类属性的推断,以量化与边际收入差距的符号变化点检测相关的不确定性,定义为[式],其中r1≥…≥rn为与n个产品相关的收益参数。通过对潜在偏好分数代入牛顿去偏极大似然估计量(MLE),我们得到边际收入缺口估计量[方程],并证明了它们的渐近正态性。进一步,我们通过间隙估计构造了一个极大统计量来检测符号变化点:[EQUATION],其中[EQUATION]是[EQUATION]渐近方差的一致估计量。通过乘子自举技术逼近最大统计量的分布,我们提出了一个有效的检验程序。我们还进行了数值实验来评估我们的方法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信