Merger Process Reform: A Sisyphean Journey

J. Sims, Robert E. Jones, Hugh M Hollman
{"title":"Merger Process Reform: A Sisyphean Journey","authors":"J. Sims, Robert E. Jones, Hugh M Hollman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1735408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Merger Regulatory Process as we know it has existed for thirty years. There have been marginal shifts (up and down) in enforcement intensity with changes in administrations and personnel, but there has been one constant: complaints about the burden of the Second Request process. Some of this is inevitable — prosecutors and potential defendants will rarely have identical perspectives. But there has been enough consensus on the flaws in the process that there have been a series of agency efforts to improve it. The problem has not been solved, and we believe a real solution will require a completely different approach to the problem. This article proposes such a new approach.","PeriodicalId":170425,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Vertical & Horizontal Integration (Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Vertical & Horizontal Integration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1735408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Merger Regulatory Process as we know it has existed for thirty years. There have been marginal shifts (up and down) in enforcement intensity with changes in administrations and personnel, but there has been one constant: complaints about the burden of the Second Request process. Some of this is inevitable — prosecutors and potential defendants will rarely have identical perspectives. But there has been enough consensus on the flaws in the process that there have been a series of agency efforts to improve it. The problem has not been solved, and we believe a real solution will require a completely different approach to the problem. This article proposes such a new approach.
并购流程改革:西西弗斯之旅
我们所知道的合并监管程序已经存在了30年。随着行政部门和人员的变化,执法强度也有轻微的变化(上下变化),但有一点是不变的:对第二次请求程序负担的抱怨。其中一些是不可避免的——检察官和潜在被告很少有相同的观点。但是,对于这一过程中的缺陷,人们已经达成了足够多的共识,因此机构已经采取了一系列措施来改进这一过程。这个问题还没有解决,我们认为真正的解决方案需要一个完全不同的方法来解决这个问题。本文提出了这样一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信