Knowledge and Power: Hayek’s Dual Problems with Planning

Byron Carson, Christopher J. Coyne
{"title":"Knowledge and Power: Hayek’s Dual Problems with Planning","authors":"Byron Carson, Christopher J. Coyne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3301967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the connection between Hayek’s dual problems of planning. Following Hayek we begin from the premise that the knowledge problem is ubiquitous. As Hayek argued, markets are effective at resolving the knowledge problem. However, where markets are absent, the knowledge problem requires a search for alternative mechanisms to determine the allocation of scarce resource. Political planning is one such coordination mechanism. Reliance on political planning, however, inevitably leads to the power problem as significant discretionary power is granted to those tasked with planning. If one was to read only Hayek’s work on the knowledge problem, or only his popular writings, such as The Road to Serfdom, they might miss the important connection between these dual problems.","PeriodicalId":253619,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3301967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper explores the connection between Hayek’s dual problems of planning. Following Hayek we begin from the premise that the knowledge problem is ubiquitous. As Hayek argued, markets are effective at resolving the knowledge problem. However, where markets are absent, the knowledge problem requires a search for alternative mechanisms to determine the allocation of scarce resource. Political planning is one such coordination mechanism. Reliance on political planning, however, inevitably leads to the power problem as significant discretionary power is granted to those tasked with planning. If one was to read only Hayek’s work on the knowledge problem, or only his popular writings, such as The Road to Serfdom, they might miss the important connection between these dual problems.
知识与权力:哈耶克与计划的双重问题
本文探讨了哈耶克关于计划的双重问题之间的联系。遵循哈耶克,我们从知识问题是普遍存在的这一前提出发。正如哈耶克所言,市场在解决知识问题方面是有效的。然而,在没有市场的地方,知识问题要求寻找其他机制来决定稀缺资源的分配。政治规划就是这样一种协调机制。然而,依赖政治计划不可避免地导致权力问题,因为负责计划的人获得了很大的自由裁量权。如果一个人只读哈耶克关于知识问题的著作,或者只读他的通俗著作,比如《通往奴役之路》,他们可能会错过这两个问题之间的重要联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信