The Empirical Economics of Online Attention

A. Boik, S. Greenstein, Jeffrey T. Prince
{"title":"The Empirical Economics of Online Attention","authors":"A. Boik, S. Greenstein, Jeffrey T. Prince","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2807046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In several markets, firms compete not for consumer expenditure but instead for consumer attention. We model and characterize how households allocate their scarce attention in arguably the largest market for attention: the Internet. Our characterization of household attention allocation operates along three dimensions: how much attention is allocated, where that attention is allocated, and how that attention is allocated. Using click-stream data for thousands of U.S. households, we assess if and how attention allocation on each dimension changed between 2008 and 2013, a time of large increases in online offerings. We identify vast and expected changes in where households allocate their attention (away from chat and news towards video and social media), and yet we simultaneously identify remarkable stability in how much attention is allocated and how it is allocated. Specifically, we identify (i) persistence in the elasticity of attention according to income and (ii) complete stability in the dispersion of attention across sites and in the intensity of attention within sites. We illustrate how this finding is difficult to reconcile with standard models of optimal attention allocation and suggest alternatives that may be more suitable. We conclude that increasingly valuable offerings change where households go online, but not their general online attention patterns. This conclusion has important implications for competition and welfare in other markets for attention.","PeriodicalId":141238,"journal":{"name":"Paper Sessions","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paper Sessions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2807046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In several markets, firms compete not for consumer expenditure but instead for consumer attention. We model and characterize how households allocate their scarce attention in arguably the largest market for attention: the Internet. Our characterization of household attention allocation operates along three dimensions: how much attention is allocated, where that attention is allocated, and how that attention is allocated. Using click-stream data for thousands of U.S. households, we assess if and how attention allocation on each dimension changed between 2008 and 2013, a time of large increases in online offerings. We identify vast and expected changes in where households allocate their attention (away from chat and news towards video and social media), and yet we simultaneously identify remarkable stability in how much attention is allocated and how it is allocated. Specifically, we identify (i) persistence in the elasticity of attention according to income and (ii) complete stability in the dispersion of attention across sites and in the intensity of attention within sites. We illustrate how this finding is difficult to reconcile with standard models of optimal attention allocation and suggest alternatives that may be more suitable. We conclude that increasingly valuable offerings change where households go online, but not their general online attention patterns. This conclusion has important implications for competition and welfare in other markets for attention.
网络注意力的实证经济学
在一些市场中,企业竞争的不是消费者的支出,而是消费者的注意力。我们建立模型并描述了家庭如何在最大的注意力市场——互联网上分配他们稀缺的注意力。我们对家庭注意力分配的描述有三个方面:分配了多少注意力,在哪里分配注意力,以及如何分配注意力。利用数千个美国家庭的点击流数据,我们评估了在2008年至2013年期间,在线产品大量增加,每个维度的注意力分配是否发生了变化,以及如何发生变化。我们发现,在家庭分配注意力的地方(从聊天和新闻转向视频和社交媒体)发生了巨大且预期的变化,但我们同时发现,在分配多少注意力以及如何分配注意力方面,我们表现出了显著的稳定性。具体来说,我们确定了(i)根据收入的注意力弹性的持久性和(ii)跨站点的注意力分散和站点内的注意力强度的完全稳定性。我们说明了这一发现如何难以与最佳注意力分配的标准模型相协调,并提出了可能更合适的替代方案。我们的结论是,越来越有价值的产品改变了家庭上网的地方,但没有改变他们一般的在线关注模式。这一结论对其他市场的竞争和福利具有重要的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信