{"title":"Supplementary Notes to \"Arabic Books and Libraries in the Umaiyad Period\"","authors":"Ruth Stellhorn Mackensen","doi":"10.1086/370534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NOTE 29. R. Strothmann, \"Das Problem der literarischen Pers6nlichkeit Zaid ibn cAli,\" Der Islam, XIII (1923), 1 ff. The text of the legal compendium was published by Griffini, Corpus iuris di Zaid ibn cAll (Milan, 1919). NOTE 73. Al-Masciidi (d. A.D. 956) states (Murj at-Dhahab, IV, 89) that the Book of Kings by cUbaid ibn Sharya circulated widely in his day; it was used by H1amdsnI (d. A.D. 945) in his Iklil and later in the historical commentary to The Himyarite Ode, probably also written by the author of the ode, Nashwin ibn SacId al-HIimyari (d. A.D. 1177) (see Nicholson, Literary History of the Arabs, p. 13). The present form of the Relation of cUbaid, which consists of answers to questions asked by Mucawiya, agrees with the statement of the Fihrist, p. 89, to the effect that this caliph summoned him to court to ask him for historical information, after which he caused it to be recorded. Taken with the above-mentioned use of this work, there seems to be considerable evidence for its authenticity and the historicity of its author. It is published as a supplement to the T1jdn of Wahb ibn Munabbih in the recension of Ibn Hisham (Hyderabad, A.H. 1347) (see Brockelmann, Geschichte der arabischen Literatur, Suppl. I [1937], pp. 100 f.). NOTE 107. See also Brockelmann, op. cit., Suppl. I, pp. 76 ff. NOTE 126. The Fihrist, p. 34, also refers to a Tafsir by Al-Hasan of Basra (d. 110/728-29). His glosses were collected in commentary form by cAmr ibn cUbaid (d. 145/762) (see G. Bergstrisser, \"Die Koranlesung des Hasan von Basra,\" Islamica, II [1926], 11-57). The chief source for Hasan's comments is the","PeriodicalId":252942,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1939-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/370534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
NOTE 29. R. Strothmann, "Das Problem der literarischen Pers6nlichkeit Zaid ibn cAli," Der Islam, XIII (1923), 1 ff. The text of the legal compendium was published by Griffini, Corpus iuris di Zaid ibn cAll (Milan, 1919). NOTE 73. Al-Masciidi (d. A.D. 956) states (Murj at-Dhahab, IV, 89) that the Book of Kings by cUbaid ibn Sharya circulated widely in his day; it was used by H1amdsnI (d. A.D. 945) in his Iklil and later in the historical commentary to The Himyarite Ode, probably also written by the author of the ode, Nashwin ibn SacId al-HIimyari (d. A.D. 1177) (see Nicholson, Literary History of the Arabs, p. 13). The present form of the Relation of cUbaid, which consists of answers to questions asked by Mucawiya, agrees with the statement of the Fihrist, p. 89, to the effect that this caliph summoned him to court to ask him for historical information, after which he caused it to be recorded. Taken with the above-mentioned use of this work, there seems to be considerable evidence for its authenticity and the historicity of its author. It is published as a supplement to the T1jdn of Wahb ibn Munabbih in the recension of Ibn Hisham (Hyderabad, A.H. 1347) (see Brockelmann, Geschichte der arabischen Literatur, Suppl. I [1937], pp. 100 f.). NOTE 107. See also Brockelmann, op. cit., Suppl. I, pp. 76 ff. NOTE 126. The Fihrist, p. 34, also refers to a Tafsir by Al-Hasan of Basra (d. 110/728-29). His glosses were collected in commentary form by cAmr ibn cUbaid (d. 145/762) (see G. Bergstrisser, "Die Koranlesung des Hasan von Basra," Islamica, II [1926], 11-57). The chief source for Hasan's comments is the
注意29。R. Strothmann,“关于文学的问题”,《伊斯兰》,1923年第13期,第1页。法律纲要的文本由Griffini出版,Corpus iuris di Zaid ibn cAll(米兰,1919年)。请注意73。Al-Masciidi(公元956年)说(Murj at-Dhahab, IV, 89)古巴伊本·沙里亚的《列王记》在他那个时代广为流传;它被H1amdsnI(公元945年)在他的Iklil中使用,后来在himyite颂歌的历史评论中使用,可能也是由颂歌的作者Nashwin ibn SacId al-HIimyari(公元1177年)写的(见Nicholson,阿拉伯文学史,第13页)。《古巴关系》的目前形式是对穆卡维亚所提问题的回答,它与第89页中菲赫斯特的说法一致,即这位哈里发把他召到法庭,要求他提供历史资料,然后他让人把这些资料记录下来。考虑到上述对这部作品的使用,似乎有相当多的证据表明它的真实性和作者的历史性。它是作为伊本·希沙姆(海得拉巴,公元1347年)修订本《伊本·穆纳比》的补充出版的(见Brockelmann,《阿拉伯文学汇编》,增刊)。[1937],第100页)。请注意107。另见布罗克尔曼,同上,补编。1,第76页后。请注意126。第34页的fichrist也提到了巴士拉的Al-Hasan(公元110/728-29年)的Tafsir。他的注释由cAmr ibn cUbaid(145/762)收集(见G. Bergstrisser,“Die Koranlesung des Hasan von Basra,”Islamica, II[1926], 11-57)。哈桑评论的主要来源是