Rapid scientific communication in times of pandemic

Eduardo Santos Rocha Rocha, R. Araújo
{"title":"Rapid scientific communication in times of pandemic","authors":"Eduardo Santos Rocha Rocha, R. Araújo","doi":"10.35699/2237-6658.2021.37176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aimed to analyze the online attention received by preprints about covid-19 shared on Twitter between the years 2020 to September 2021. Literature review, document research, content analysis and altmetric analysis procedures were used. The preprints were retrieved from the Dimensions database and classified by thematic categories, with eight being classified in the Clinical Studies category, three in the Others category, 14 in the Prevention category, six in the Transmission category, five in the Treatment – ​​Drugs category and four in the Variants category. 100,968 tweets were registered in the Clinical Studies category, 56,361 in the Others category, 269,347 in the Prevention category, 81,135 in the Transmission category, 61,720 in the Treatment – ​​Drugs category and 57,655 in the Variants category. It was concluded that altmetry has provided a greater understanding of the impact of research on covid-19 and on the debate held in public space about the pandemic and its consequences based on the understanding of online attention directed at these studies.","PeriodicalId":424740,"journal":{"name":"Múltiplos Olhares em Ciência da Informação","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Múltiplos Olhares em Ciência da Informação","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35699/2237-6658.2021.37176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The research aimed to analyze the online attention received by preprints about covid-19 shared on Twitter between the years 2020 to September 2021. Literature review, document research, content analysis and altmetric analysis procedures were used. The preprints were retrieved from the Dimensions database and classified by thematic categories, with eight being classified in the Clinical Studies category, three in the Others category, 14 in the Prevention category, six in the Transmission category, five in the Treatment – ​​Drugs category and four in the Variants category. 100,968 tweets were registered in the Clinical Studies category, 56,361 in the Others category, 269,347 in the Prevention category, 81,135 in the Transmission category, 61,720 in the Treatment – ​​Drugs category and 57,655 in the Variants category. It was concluded that altmetry has provided a greater understanding of the impact of research on covid-19 and on the debate held in public space about the pandemic and its consequences based on the understanding of online attention directed at these studies.
大流行时期的快速科学传播
该研究旨在分析2020年至2021年9月期间推特上关于covid-19的预印本收到的在线关注。采用文献综述、文献研究、内容分析和替代分析法。预印本从Dimensions数据库检索,并按专题类别分类,其中8份属于临床研究类别,3份属于其他类别,14份属于预防类别,6份属于传播类别,5份属于治疗-药物类别,4份属于变异类别。100,968条推文注册在临床研究类别,56,361条注册在其他类别,269,347条注册在预防类别,81,135条注册在传播类别,61,720条注册在治疗-药物类别,57,655条注册在变体类别。结论是,基于对网上对这些研究的关注的理解,替代测量法使人们更好地了解了对covid-19研究的影响,以及对公共空间中关于大流行及其后果的辩论的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信