Perceptual evaluation of non-verbal cues from a humanoid robot for multi-party teleconferences

Jianfeng Xu, S. Sakazawa, Y. Matsumura, H. Kuzuoka
{"title":"Perceptual evaluation of non-verbal cues from a humanoid robot for multi-party teleconferences","authors":"Jianfeng Xu, S. Sakazawa, Y. Matsumura, H. Kuzuoka","doi":"10.1109/ICMA.2015.7237651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humanoid robots that act as proxies for real people are useful for turn-taking in multi-party teleconferences due to their telepresence effect. However, it is still rather challenging to explore if the robot motions are effective or not as non-verbal cues. For this purpose, this paper presents a perceptual evaluation of robot motions in the context of a multi-party teleconference. Our main focus is on analyzing the relationship between the robot motions and the motivation to speak by testing the following two hypotheses. (H1) There are some kinds of robot motions that are more effective for expressing the motivation to speak than others. (H2) The intensity of robot motions is correlated with the perceived strength of the motivation to speak. In a preliminary experiment with five subjects, we confirmed that our hypotheses were reasonable and we formulated the robot motions that were used in the experiments. In each of 10 evaluation experiments, three participants attended a teleconference for about 30 minutes and one of them (called a subject) evaluated the robot motions in real time. The evaluation results from a total of 10 subjects in 10 experiments demonstrate that both hypotheses can be partly upheld.","PeriodicalId":286366,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA.2015.7237651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humanoid robots that act as proxies for real people are useful for turn-taking in multi-party teleconferences due to their telepresence effect. However, it is still rather challenging to explore if the robot motions are effective or not as non-verbal cues. For this purpose, this paper presents a perceptual evaluation of robot motions in the context of a multi-party teleconference. Our main focus is on analyzing the relationship between the robot motions and the motivation to speak by testing the following two hypotheses. (H1) There are some kinds of robot motions that are more effective for expressing the motivation to speak than others. (H2) The intensity of robot motions is correlated with the perceived strength of the motivation to speak. In a preliminary experiment with five subjects, we confirmed that our hypotheses were reasonable and we formulated the robot motions that were used in the experiments. In each of 10 evaluation experiments, three participants attended a teleconference for about 30 minutes and one of them (called a subject) evaluated the robot motions in real time. The evaluation results from a total of 10 subjects in 10 experiments demonstrate that both hypotheses can be partly upheld.
多人远程会议中仿人机器人非语言线索的感知评价
人形机器人作为真人的代理人,由于其远程呈现效果,在多方远程会议中轮流使用是有用的。然而,探索机器人的动作是否是有效的非语言线索仍然是相当具有挑战性的。为此,本文提出了一种在多方电话会议环境下对机器人运动的感知评价。我们的主要重点是通过测试以下两个假设来分析机器人动作和说话动机之间的关系。(H1)有几种机器人动作比其他动作更能有效地表达说话的动机。(H2)机器人动作的强度与说话动机的感知强度相关。在五名受试者的初步实验中,我们确认了我们的假设是合理的,并制定了实验中使用的机器人运动。在10个评估实验中,每个实验中,三名参与者参加了大约30分钟的电话会议,其中一人(称为受试者)实时评估机器人的运动。10个实验共10个被试的评价结果表明,这两个假设都是部分成立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信