Can the Hawkes process be used to evaluate the spread of online information?

Pierre Watine, Arezo Bodaghi, K. Schmitt
{"title":"Can the Hawkes process be used to evaluate the spread of online information?","authors":"Pierre Watine, Arezo Bodaghi, K. Schmitt","doi":"10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media allows people to easily express themselves and spread information online. This is a boon to self-expression and communication but has allowed for misinformation to flourish as well. It may be difficult to differentiate facts from misleading opinions. Automatic fact-checking has the potential to reduce the spread of misinformation while browsing. Multiple potential approaches to implementing fact-checking software have been explored. One approach is to detect the information’s origin and evaluate if it is a valid primary source. Most existing methods to model the spread of information online require extensive computational resources and time to train a deep-learning algorithm, as well as a high-level representation of the propagation of the content. In addition, these methods are mainly used to classify and verify the information itself rather than the information’s provenance. The Hawkes process makes it possible to evaluate and model information spread tendencies and map out the source of the information by comparing the intensity of shared posts over time. 1000 posts of 3 blog pages on Reddit were scraped from the Internet to test if the modified Hawkes process can detect which page is influenced by which. The Hawkes process was able to distinguish the influenced, the influencer and the control blog page. Therefore, the Hawkes process may be used to identify the primary sources of information. Future research may need to compare the accuracy and precision of this process compared to other methods.","PeriodicalId":314239,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social media allows people to easily express themselves and spread information online. This is a boon to self-expression and communication but has allowed for misinformation to flourish as well. It may be difficult to differentiate facts from misleading opinions. Automatic fact-checking has the potential to reduce the spread of misinformation while browsing. Multiple potential approaches to implementing fact-checking software have been explored. One approach is to detect the information’s origin and evaluate if it is a valid primary source. Most existing methods to model the spread of information online require extensive computational resources and time to train a deep-learning algorithm, as well as a high-level representation of the propagation of the content. In addition, these methods are mainly used to classify and verify the information itself rather than the information’s provenance. The Hawkes process makes it possible to evaluate and model information spread tendencies and map out the source of the information by comparing the intensity of shared posts over time. 1000 posts of 3 blog pages on Reddit were scraped from the Internet to test if the modified Hawkes process can detect which page is influenced by which. The Hawkes process was able to distinguish the influenced, the influencer and the control blog page. Therefore, the Hawkes process may be used to identify the primary sources of information. Future research may need to compare the accuracy and precision of this process compared to other methods.
霍克斯过程可以用来评估在线信息的传播吗?
社交媒体使人们能够轻松地在网上表达自己和传播信息。这有利于自我表达和沟通,但也导致了错误信息的泛滥。区分事实和误导人的意见可能是困难的。自动事实核查有可能在浏览时减少错误信息的传播。已经探索了实现事实核查软件的多种潜在方法。一种方法是检测信息的来源,并评估它是否是有效的主要来源。大多数现有的在线信息传播建模方法需要大量的计算资源和时间来训练深度学习算法,以及内容传播的高级表示。此外,这些方法主要用于信息本身的分类和验证,而不是信息的来源。霍克斯流程使评估和模拟信息传播趋势成为可能,并通过比较一段时间内分享帖子的强度,绘制出信息的来源。从互联网上抓取了Reddit上3个博客页面的1000篇帖子,以测试修改后的Hawkes进程是否可以检测出哪个页面受哪个页面的影响。霍克斯流程能够区分受影响者、影响者和控制博客页面。因此,霍克斯过程可用于识别信息的主要来源。未来的研究可能需要将这种方法的准确性和精密度与其他方法进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信