JUSTIFICATION FOR AUTONOMY, COMMON MORALITY AND BENEFICENCE USING THE METHODS OF PRINCIPLISM

Saleh Alnahdi PhD
{"title":"JUSTIFICATION FOR AUTONOMY, COMMON MORALITY AND BENEFICENCE USING THE METHODS OF PRINCIPLISM","authors":"Saleh Alnahdi PhD","doi":"10.53555/eijhss.v4i2.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focus on methods of principlism and how it can be used as a mode of justification for Autonomy, Common Morality, and Beneficence. Each area will be explored in this paper in order to give insight into how these principles came to be what they are today. In particular, I will discuss the nature of autonomy, by referring to definition of autonomy and theories of it, as well as to what the main principle of autonomy is, and what types it consists of. Common morality includes the differences between normative and non-normative ethics in terms of principles, rules, and rights. Furthermore, the discussion will focus on what the meaning of common morality is as it is shared among all cultures. Lastly, the discussion will consider the concept of beneficence and the types in which it manifests itself.","PeriodicalId":109852,"journal":{"name":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v4i2.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focus on methods of principlism and how it can be used as a mode of justification for Autonomy, Common Morality, and Beneficence. Each area will be explored in this paper in order to give insight into how these principles came to be what they are today. In particular, I will discuss the nature of autonomy, by referring to definition of autonomy and theories of it, as well as to what the main principle of autonomy is, and what types it consists of. Common morality includes the differences between normative and non-normative ethics in terms of principles, rules, and rights. Furthermore, the discussion will focus on what the meaning of common morality is as it is shared among all cultures. Lastly, the discussion will consider the concept of beneficence and the types in which it manifests itself.
运用原则主义的方法对自治、共同道德和善行进行论证
这篇文章的重点是原则主义的方法,以及它如何被用作自治、共同道德和善行的辩护模式。本文将探讨每个领域,以便深入了解这些原则是如何成为今天的样子的。特别是,我将讨论自治的本质,通过参考自治的定义和它的理论,以及自治的主要原则是什么,它由什么类型组成。共同道德包括规范伦理和非规范伦理在原则、规则和权利方面的差异。此外,讨论将集中在共同道德的意义是什么,因为它是所有文化共享。最后,讨论将考虑善行的概念及其表现形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信