Technical Systems Development Risk Factors: The Role of Empowering Leadership in Lowering Developers’ Stress

J. Windeler, Likoebe M. Maruping, V. Venkatesh
{"title":"Technical Systems Development Risk Factors: The Role of Empowering Leadership in Lowering Developers’ Stress","authors":"J. Windeler, Likoebe M. Maruping, V. Venkatesh","doi":"10.1287/isre.2017.0716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of information systems development ISD projects depends on the developers who deliver them. However, developers face many challenges in bringing an ISD project to successful completion. These projects are often large and highly complex, with volatile targets, creating a stressful environment for developers. Although prior literature has considered how technical ISD risk factors, such as project size, complexity, and target volatility, affect team-and project-level outcomes, their effects on developers have received limited attention. This gap in the literature is problematic for two reasons: 1 the interplay between developers and project characteristics are unaccounted for, resulting in an incomplete picture of ISD; and 2 developer stress has been shown to reduce team performance. In this research, we examine the role of empowering leadership in reducing developer stress in ISD. We develop a multilevel model of the effect of empowering leadership on the relationship between technical ISD risk factors and developers' role perceptions, and explore the consequences for developers' stress. The model was tested in a field study of 350 developers in 73 ISD teams from a large U.S.-based firm. Results showed that empowering leadership ameliorated the negative effects of project size and target volatility on role ambiguity as well as the negative effects of project size, complexity, and target volatility on role conflict and stress. We also found that empowering leadership reduced role ambiguity, role conflict, and stress directly, and that role ambiguity and role conflict increased stress. Project size, complexity, and target volatility were found to increase empowering leadership behaviors. We conclude that empowering leadership can be an effective means of helping developers cope with technical ISD risk factors and discuss the implications of our findings for research and practice. \n \nThe online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0716 .","PeriodicalId":419336,"journal":{"name":"Management of Innovation eJournal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

The success of information systems development ISD projects depends on the developers who deliver them. However, developers face many challenges in bringing an ISD project to successful completion. These projects are often large and highly complex, with volatile targets, creating a stressful environment for developers. Although prior literature has considered how technical ISD risk factors, such as project size, complexity, and target volatility, affect team-and project-level outcomes, their effects on developers have received limited attention. This gap in the literature is problematic for two reasons: 1 the interplay between developers and project characteristics are unaccounted for, resulting in an incomplete picture of ISD; and 2 developer stress has been shown to reduce team performance. In this research, we examine the role of empowering leadership in reducing developer stress in ISD. We develop a multilevel model of the effect of empowering leadership on the relationship between technical ISD risk factors and developers' role perceptions, and explore the consequences for developers' stress. The model was tested in a field study of 350 developers in 73 ISD teams from a large U.S.-based firm. Results showed that empowering leadership ameliorated the negative effects of project size and target volatility on role ambiguity as well as the negative effects of project size, complexity, and target volatility on role conflict and stress. We also found that empowering leadership reduced role ambiguity, role conflict, and stress directly, and that role ambiguity and role conflict increased stress. Project size, complexity, and target volatility were found to increase empowering leadership behaviors. We conclude that empowering leadership can be an effective means of helping developers cope with technical ISD risk factors and discuss the implications of our findings for research and practice. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0716 .
技术系统开发风险因素:授权领导在降低开发人员压力中的作用
信息系统开发ISD项目的成功取决于交付它们的开发人员。然而,开发人员在成功完成ISD项目时面临许多挑战。这些项目通常是大型且高度复杂的,目标不稳定,为开发人员创造了一个紧张的环境。尽管先前的文献已经考虑了技术性ISD风险因素(如项目规模、复杂性和目标易变性)如何影响团队和项目级别的结果,但它们对开发人员的影响却受到了有限的关注。这种文献上的差距是有问题的,原因有两个:1,开发者和项目特征之间的相互作用没有被考虑进去,导致了ISD的不完整图景;开发人员的压力已被证明会降低团队绩效。在本研究中,我们研究了授权领导在减少开发人员压力方面的作用。我们建立了授权型领导对技术ISD风险因素与开发人员角色认知之间关系影响的多层次模型,并探讨了授权型领导对开发人员压力的影响。该模型在来自美国一家大型公司的73个ISD团队的350名开发人员的实地研究中进行了测试。结果表明,授权型领导可以改善项目规模和目标波动对角色模糊性的负面影响,以及项目规模、复杂性和目标波动对角色冲突和压力的负面影响。我们还发现,授权型领导直接减少了角色模糊、角色冲突和压力,而角色模糊和角色冲突增加了压力。研究发现,项目规模、复杂性和目标波动性会增加授权领导行为。我们得出结论,授权领导可以是帮助开发人员应对技术ISD风险因素的有效手段,并讨论了我们的研究结果对研究和实践的影响。在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0716上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信