WORKERS, FARMERS, AND CATHOLICISM: A HISTORY OF POLITICAL CLASS COALITIONS AND THE SOUTH-EUROPEAN WELFARE STATE REGIME

P. Manow
{"title":"WORKERS, FARMERS, AND CATHOLICISM: A HISTORY OF POLITICAL CLASS COALITIONS AND THE SOUTH-EUROPEAN WELFARE STATE REGIME","authors":"P. Manow","doi":"10.26843/MESTRADODIREITO.V3I1.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The explanatory model behind Esping-Andersen’s ‘three regime’-typology points to the variance in ‘political coalition building in the transition from a rural economy to a middle-class society’, particularly to whether or not farmers and workers were able to form coalitions during this transition. The article reconsiders the relation between party systems and welfare state regimes. It highlights the systematic variation among European party systems with respect to the electoral success of communist parties. The electoral strength of communist parties is argued to be related to the intensity of past conflicts between the nation state and the Catholic Church in the mono-denominational countries of Europe’s South. These conflicts rendered a coalition between pious farmers and the anticlerical worker’s movement unthinkable and furthered the radicalization of the left. The article argues that the split on the left explains much of what is distinctive about southern Europe’s postwar Political Economies.","PeriodicalId":329145,"journal":{"name":"Revista Direito das Relações Sociais e Trabalhistas","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Direito das Relações Sociais e Trabalhistas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26843/MESTRADODIREITO.V3I1.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The explanatory model behind Esping-Andersen’s ‘three regime’-typology points to the variance in ‘political coalition building in the transition from a rural economy to a middle-class society’, particularly to whether or not farmers and workers were able to form coalitions during this transition. The article reconsiders the relation between party systems and welfare state regimes. It highlights the systematic variation among European party systems with respect to the electoral success of communist parties. The electoral strength of communist parties is argued to be related to the intensity of past conflicts between the nation state and the Catholic Church in the mono-denominational countries of Europe’s South. These conflicts rendered a coalition between pious farmers and the anticlerical worker’s movement unthinkable and furthered the radicalization of the left. The article argues that the split on the left explains much of what is distinctive about southern Europe’s postwar Political Economies.
工人、农民和天主教:政治阶级联盟和南欧福利国家政权的历史
埃斯平-安德森的“三种政体”类型学背后的解释模型指出了“从农村经济向中产阶级社会转型过程中政治联盟建设的差异”,特别是农民和工人在这一转型过程中是否能够形成联盟。本文重新思考了政党制度与福利国家制度之间的关系。它突出了欧洲政党制度在共产党选举成功方面的系统性差异。有人认为,共产党的选举实力与欧洲南部单一教派国家的民族国家与天主教会之间过去冲突的强度有关。这些冲突使得虔诚的农民和反教权工人运动之间的联盟变得不可思议,并进一步推动了左翼的激进化。这篇文章认为,左翼的分裂在很大程度上解释了南欧战后政治经济的独特之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信