Deliberation for Development: Ghana’s First Deliberative Poll

D. Chirawurah, James S. Fishkin, N. Santuah, Alice Siu, A. Bawah, G. Kranjac-Berisavljevic, Kathleen Giles
{"title":"Deliberation for Development: Ghana’s First Deliberative Poll","authors":"D. Chirawurah, James S. Fishkin, N. Santuah, Alice Siu, A. Bawah, G. Kranjac-Berisavljevic, Kathleen Giles","doi":"10.16997/JDD.314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article poses the problem of public consultation in developing countries and applies a solution in Ghana as a test case. It describes the theoretical rationale for deliberative consultation with random samples, describes specific criteria for success, and then assesses an application under the challenging conditions of a developing country. It builds on notions of “deliberative democracy,” and shows how they can be practically realized in an African context through “Deliberative Polling” (DP). The challenge is that the context is one of the poorest parts of one of the poorest countries in Africa. Rather than consulting just stakeholders, or self-selected populations, or using conventional surveys, DP’s have the advantage of consulting random samples with deliberation in depth in confidential surveys so that the opinion changes can be evaluated at the individual level, free of social pressures for consensus. Is this practical in this context? A DP was conducted in Tamale, Ghana on issues of water, sanitation, hygiene and food security. Criteria for success for DPs that have been applied in highly developed countries are discussed and then applied in Ghana under challenging conditions.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Deliberation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

This article poses the problem of public consultation in developing countries and applies a solution in Ghana as a test case. It describes the theoretical rationale for deliberative consultation with random samples, describes specific criteria for success, and then assesses an application under the challenging conditions of a developing country. It builds on notions of “deliberative democracy,” and shows how they can be practically realized in an African context through “Deliberative Polling” (DP). The challenge is that the context is one of the poorest parts of one of the poorest countries in Africa. Rather than consulting just stakeholders, or self-selected populations, or using conventional surveys, DP’s have the advantage of consulting random samples with deliberation in depth in confidential surveys so that the opinion changes can be evaluated at the individual level, free of social pressures for consensus. Is this practical in this context? A DP was conducted in Tamale, Ghana on issues of water, sanitation, hygiene and food security. Criteria for success for DPs that have been applied in highly developed countries are discussed and then applied in Ghana under challenging conditions.
审议促进发展:加纳第一次审议投票
本文提出了发展中国家公众咨询的问题,并将加纳的解决方案作为试验案例加以应用。它描述了通过随机样本进行协商的理论依据,描述了成功的具体标准,然后在发展中国家具有挑战性的条件下评估一项申请。它以“协商民主”的概念为基础,并展示了如何通过“协商投票”(DP)在非洲的背景下实际实现这些概念。挑战在于,背景是非洲最贫穷国家之一的最贫穷地区之一。DP不只是咨询利益相关者或自我选择的人群,也不使用传统的调查,而是在保密调查中深入考虑随机样本,这样就可以在个人层面上评估意见的变化,而不受达成共识的社会压力的影响。在这种情况下,这可行吗?在加纳塔马莱进行了关于水、环境卫生、个人卫生和粮食安全问题的发展规划。讨论了在高度发达国家应用的发展方案的成功标准,然后在具有挑战性的条件下在加纳应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信