Cervical cerclage and anaesthesia - Regional or General: Which is better?

M. Suryavanshi, Ujjwala Andurkar
{"title":"Cervical cerclage and anaesthesia - Regional or General: Which is better?","authors":"M. Suryavanshi, Ujjwala Andurkar","doi":"10.26611/10151126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cervical incompetence is the most common cause of second trimester spontaneous abortions and preterm labour4. Cervical cerclage is usually performed in such patients to prevent this sequelae. In our study, the cervical cerclage procedure was done under general and regional anaesthesia3 in order to find out the most suitable anaesthetic technique for this procedure. Methods: In our study 70 patients were studied. They were randomly divided into 2 groups of 35 patients each. The efficacy of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia were studied. Results: All the patients receiving general anaesthesia required sedation essentially and more post-operative analgesia(42.86%) compared to the regional anaesthesia group(5.71%). 25.71% of patients had postoperative nausea in the G group compared to 2.86% of the patients in R group. The surgical time was approximately the same in all the patients. Even though the anaesthesia time and the recovery room stay was more in the R group, this statistically significant difference was not of much clinical importance. The hospital stay was the same in both the groups and was statistically insignificant(p 0.22). Conclusion: Both general and regional anaesthesia can be safely used for the performance of cervical encirclage procedure without any significant complication.","PeriodicalId":118187,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/10151126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical incompetence is the most common cause of second trimester spontaneous abortions and preterm labour4. Cervical cerclage is usually performed in such patients to prevent this sequelae. In our study, the cervical cerclage procedure was done under general and regional anaesthesia3 in order to find out the most suitable anaesthetic technique for this procedure. Methods: In our study 70 patients were studied. They were randomly divided into 2 groups of 35 patients each. The efficacy of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia were studied. Results: All the patients receiving general anaesthesia required sedation essentially and more post-operative analgesia(42.86%) compared to the regional anaesthesia group(5.71%). 25.71% of patients had postoperative nausea in the G group compared to 2.86% of the patients in R group. The surgical time was approximately the same in all the patients. Even though the anaesthesia time and the recovery room stay was more in the R group, this statistically significant difference was not of much clinical importance. The hospital stay was the same in both the groups and was statistically insignificant(p 0.22). Conclusion: Both general and regional anaesthesia can be safely used for the performance of cervical encirclage procedure without any significant complication.
宫颈环扎术和麻醉-局部还是全身:哪个更好?
背景:宫颈功能不全是妊娠中期自然流产和早产的最常见原因。通常对这类患者行宫颈环扎术以预防这种后遗症。在我们的研究中,宫颈环切术在全身和局部麻醉下进行,以找出最适合该手术的麻醉技术。方法:对70例患者进行研究。随机分为两组,每组35例。观察全身麻醉和区域麻醉的效果。结果:全麻组患者基本需要镇静,术后需要更多的镇痛(42.86%),而区域麻醉组患者(5.71%)需要更多的镇痛。G组术后恶心发生率为25.71%,R组为2.86%。所有患者的手术时间大致相同。尽管R组麻醉时间和恢复室停留时间更长,但这一统计学意义上的差异并没有太大的临床意义。两组患者住院时间相同,差异无统计学意义(p 0.22)。结论:全身麻醉和局部麻醉均可安全进行宫颈包皮术,无明显并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信