IMPROVING WRITING SKILL OF RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH GIVING CHAIN AND QUESTIONS TECHNIQUES IN SMAN 3 TEBING TINGGI

Puji Dwi Sulastri
{"title":"IMPROVING WRITING SKILL OF RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH GIVING CHAIN AND QUESTIONS TECHNIQUES IN SMAN 3 TEBING TINGGI","authors":"Puji Dwi Sulastri","doi":"10.32663/edu-ling.v2i2.1096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This classroom action research aims to improve students' skills in writing recounts using chain drawing techniques and several questions.The subjects of this study were students X IIS.1 SMA 3 TEBING TINGGI 2017/2018 lessons, amounting to 22 people consisting of 11 men and 11 women.In collecting data, recount writing and observation or observation tests are conducted.All data are collected and analyzed. In analyzing the results of the tests using a system scale the rating criteria are referent values. The results that the researchers obtained from this study were qualitative data and quantitative data.Qualitative data shows that students are very active and fluent in writing recounts, this can be seen by the increase in student activity in doing their own writing recount activities in the first cycle and second cycle, and students smoothly answer questions based on the images set out in recount essays.Whereas from quantitative data, it can be seen that there is an increase in the value of students from the level or level of information written on their recount.The number of students who get A in the first cycle is 1 meeting (1 person), 2nd meeting (2 people), and 3rd meeting (4 people). On the second cycle of the 1st meeting (9 people), 2nd meeting (17 people) and 3rd meeting (22 people). Students who get B score in cycle 1, meeting 1 (4 people), meeting 2 (4 people) and meeting 3 (12 people). On cycle 2, meeting 1st (6 people), 2nd meeting (5 people) and no B value at 3rd meeting. This means giving serial images and several questions, so that the writing skills of students X IIS.1 of SMA Negeri 3 Tebing Tinggi can be improved.","PeriodicalId":269976,"journal":{"name":"Edu-Ling: Journal of English Education and Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edu-Ling: Journal of English Education and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32663/edu-ling.v2i2.1096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This classroom action research aims to improve students' skills in writing recounts using chain drawing techniques and several questions.The subjects of this study were students X IIS.1 SMA 3 TEBING TINGGI 2017/2018 lessons, amounting to 22 people consisting of 11 men and 11 women.In collecting data, recount writing and observation or observation tests are conducted.All data are collected and analyzed. In analyzing the results of the tests using a system scale the rating criteria are referent values. The results that the researchers obtained from this study were qualitative data and quantitative data.Qualitative data shows that students are very active and fluent in writing recounts, this can be seen by the increase in student activity in doing their own writing recount activities in the first cycle and second cycle, and students smoothly answer questions based on the images set out in recount essays.Whereas from quantitative data, it can be seen that there is an increase in the value of students from the level or level of information written on their recount.The number of students who get A in the first cycle is 1 meeting (1 person), 2nd meeting (2 people), and 3rd meeting (4 people). On the second cycle of the 1st meeting (9 people), 2nd meeting (17 people) and 3rd meeting (22 people). Students who get B score in cycle 1, meeting 1 (4 people), meeting 2 (4 people) and meeting 3 (12 people). On cycle 2, meeting 1st (6 people), 2nd meeting (5 people) and no B value at 3rd meeting. This means giving serial images and several questions, so that the writing skills of students X IIS.1 of SMA Negeri 3 Tebing Tinggi can be improved.
通过《三联编》中的提问技巧和提问技巧提高叙事性课文的写作技巧
本课堂行动研究旨在提高学生使用链图技巧和几个问题撰写叙述的技能。本研究的对象为2017/2018届X 11 .1 SMA 3 TEBING TINGGI学生,共22人,男11人,女11人。在收集数据时,要进行重新记录和观察或观察检验。收集并分析所有数据。在使用系统量表分析测试结果时,评级标准是参考值。研究人员从本研究中获得的结果是定性数据和定量数据。定性数据显示,学生在写作叙述中非常活跃和流畅,这可以从学生在第一周期和第二周期中进行自己的写作叙述活动的活动增加中看出,学生根据叙述文章中设定的图像顺利地回答问题。而从定量数据上可以看出,学生的价值从其记分上所写信息的水平或层次上都有所提高。第一轮得到A的人数为1人(1人),第二次(2人),第三次(4人)。在第1次会议(9人)、第2次会议(17人)和第3次会议(22人)的第二个周期。在第一阶段,会议1(4人),会议2(4人)和会议3(12人)中获得B分的学生。在周期2,第1次会议(6人),第2次会议(5人),第3次会议没有B值。这意味着给出连续的图像和几个问题,从而提高SMA Negeri 3 Tebing Tinggi学生X IIS.1的写作技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信