Comparison Of Risk Organ Distribution With Target Volume Size Variations Using Rapid ARC And IMRT Techniques For Case Of Lung Cancer

Eny Supriyaningsih, Guntur Winarno, Trisno Firmansyah
{"title":"Comparison Of Risk Organ Distribution With Target Volume Size Variations Using Rapid ARC And IMRT Techniques For Case Of Lung Cancer","authors":"Eny Supriyaningsih, Guntur Winarno, Trisno Firmansyah","doi":"10.36525/sanitas.2018.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to know how big the difference between dose distribution Rapid Arc and IMRT technique and gains on PTV dose 95%. This research is a descriptive qualitative research data obtained from Phantom to take three the size of the volume of the tumor is seen from the organs at risk of Medulla spinalis, heart, healthy and the lung from the results of the data processing and then analyzed the distribution of the received dose organs at risk. Data analysis is done using the Software eclipse. The result show received dose between flashes IMRT technique and Rapid arc technique on the size of the volume of cancer 250 cm3, 500 cm3, 750 cm3 on the part of the heart and the lungs, Rapid arc provides better radiation dose compared with IMRT but only the medulla spinalis get higher doses but still below the maximum dose organ and gains received on PTV dose 95% with the technique of Rapid Arc higher than IMRT technique.","PeriodicalId":333392,"journal":{"name":"SANITAS : Jurnal Teknologi dan Seni Kesehatan","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SANITAS : Jurnal Teknologi dan Seni Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36525/sanitas.2018.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to know how big the difference between dose distribution Rapid Arc and IMRT technique and gains on PTV dose 95%. This research is a descriptive qualitative research data obtained from Phantom to take three the size of the volume of the tumor is seen from the organs at risk of Medulla spinalis, heart, healthy and the lung from the results of the data processing and then analyzed the distribution of the received dose organs at risk. Data analysis is done using the Software eclipse. The result show received dose between flashes IMRT technique and Rapid arc technique on the size of the volume of cancer 250 cm3, 500 cm3, 750 cm3 on the part of the heart and the lungs, Rapid arc provides better radiation dose compared with IMRT but only the medulla spinalis get higher doses but still below the maximum dose organ and gains received on PTV dose 95% with the technique of Rapid Arc higher than IMRT technique.
肺癌病例中使用快速ARC和IMRT技术的危险器官分布与靶体积变化的比较
本研究旨在了解快速电弧和IMRT技术的剂量分布与PTV剂量增益95%之间的差异有多大。本研究是一种描述性质的研究,从Phantom获得的数据中取三个肿瘤的体积大小,分别从脊髓、心脏、健康和肺部的危险器官中看到,对结果进行数据处理,然后分析所受剂量的危险器官的分布。数据分析是使用Software eclipse完成的。结果显示,闪烁IMRT技术与快速弧线技术对肿瘤体积大小的接受剂量分别为250 cm3、500 cm3、750 cm3,快速弧线技术比IMRT提供了更好的辐射剂量,但只有髓质脊柱获得了更高的剂量,但仍低于最大剂量器官,快速弧线技术的PTV剂量增益比IMRT技术高95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信