PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KETERANGAN AHLI PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH (Analisis Putusan Nomor : 2421k/Pid.Sus/2016 Dan Putusan Nomor : 32/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2016/Pn.Pdg)

Agung Satria Putra
{"title":"PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KETERANGAN AHLI PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH (Analisis Putusan Nomor : 2421k/Pid.Sus/2016 Dan Putusan Nomor : 32/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2016/Pn.Pdg)","authors":"Agung Satria Putra","doi":"10.31933/unesrev.v4i3.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judge's consideration of the expert's statement from the LKPP RI on corruption in the Government Procurement of Goods/Services was used as the basis for making a decision in the form of punishment, which in Decision Number: 2421 K/PID.SUS/2016/PN/PDG the defendant as the Budget User has committed mistakes in classifying procurement packages that should be done separately but combined, determine the winner of the tender before the tender process is carried out. In the Decision Number: 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Pdg in the opinion of the Expert it is a violation when the work is not completed, then the implementation guarantee cannot be realized/disbursed in accordance with what is stipulated in Article 3 Paragraph (1) letter f and Paragraph (2) letters b, e, f, g and h of Perka LKPP Number 7 of 2011 concerning Technical Guidelines for Black List Operations. This LKPP Expert's consideration is used as the basis by the Judge in his decision. The application of the punishment in Decision Number: 2421K/PID.SUS/2016 is to declare the defendant guilty for fulfilling the elements of Article 3 of the Corruption Crime Act. Sentenced to a sentence of 2 years 6 months in prison, and a fine of Rp. 50,000,000. The Decision Number: 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Pdg states that the defendant is proven guilty of abusing his authority on the joint procurement of government goods and services as regulated in Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law and is sentenced to imprisonment for 1 (one) year. ) years and a fine of Rp. 50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiahs) provided that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with imprisonment for 1 (one) month. This penalty is lighter than the decision in Decision Number: 2421K/PID.SUS/2016 due to the consideration of the defendant's ignorance of several provisions for the procurement of government goods and services.","PeriodicalId":193737,"journal":{"name":"UNES Law Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNES Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v4i3.243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The judge's consideration of the expert's statement from the LKPP RI on corruption in the Government Procurement of Goods/Services was used as the basis for making a decision in the form of punishment, which in Decision Number: 2421 K/PID.SUS/2016/PN/PDG the defendant as the Budget User has committed mistakes in classifying procurement packages that should be done separately but combined, determine the winner of the tender before the tender process is carried out. In the Decision Number: 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Pdg in the opinion of the Expert it is a violation when the work is not completed, then the implementation guarantee cannot be realized/disbursed in accordance with what is stipulated in Article 3 Paragraph (1) letter f and Paragraph (2) letters b, e, f, g and h of Perka LKPP Number 7 of 2011 concerning Technical Guidelines for Black List Operations. This LKPP Expert's consideration is used as the basis by the Judge in his decision. The application of the punishment in Decision Number: 2421K/PID.SUS/2016 is to declare the defendant guilty for fulfilling the elements of Article 3 of the Corruption Crime Act. Sentenced to a sentence of 2 years 6 months in prison, and a fine of Rp. 50,000,000. The Decision Number: 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Pdg states that the defendant is proven guilty of abusing his authority on the joint procurement of government goods and services as regulated in Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law and is sentenced to imprisonment for 1 (one) year. ) years and a fine of Rp. 50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiahs) provided that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with imprisonment for 1 (one) month. This penalty is lighter than the decision in Decision Number: 2421K/PID.SUS/2016 due to the consideration of the defendant's ignorance of several provisions for the procurement of government goods and services.
法官对政府采购/服务腐败罪行的专家意见(判决编号:221k /Pid)。2016年和裁决:32/Pid. su - tpk /2016/ p . p .)
法官在考虑了LKPP国际商会关于政府采购货物/服务中的腐败问题的专家陈述后,以处罚的形式作出了判决,判决编号:2421 K/PID。SUS/2016/PN/PDG作为预算用户的被告在分类本应单独进行但合并进行的采购包时犯了错误,在进行招标程序之前确定招标的获胜者。决议号:32/ pid . su - tpk /2016/PN。专家认为,如果工作未完成,则属于违规行为,则不能按照2011年Perka LKPP第7号关于黑名单操作技术指南的第3条第(1)款f和第(2)款b、e、f、g和h的规定实现/支付实施保证。这名LKPP专家的意见将作为法官作出裁决的依据。判决号:2421K/PID中处罚的应用。SUS/2016将宣布被告犯有《腐败犯罪法》第3条的罪行。被判处2年6个月监禁,罚款5000万卢比。决定号:32/ pid . su - tpk /2016/PN。Pdg表示,被告被证明犯有《反腐败法》第3条规定的滥用职权联合采购政府货物和服务的罪行,并被判处1年监禁。罚款5000万卢比(5000万卢比),如果不支付罚款,将处以1(一个)月的监禁。这个惩罚比decision Number: 2421K/PID中的决定要轻。由于考虑到被告对采购政府货物和服务的几项规定的无知,因此被撤销SUS/2016。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信