{"title":"Přesocializovaná koncepce člověka v moderní sociologii","authors":"Dennis H. Wrong","doi":"10.46938/tv.2007.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dennis H. Wrong postulates sociological theory’s origins in the asking of general questions about man and society. Th e answers lose their meaning if they are elaborated without reference to the questions, as has been the case in much contemporary theory. An example is the Hobbesian question of how men become tractable to social controls. Th e two-fold answer of contemporary theory is that man „internalizes“ social norms and seeks a favorable self-image by conforming to the „expectations“ of others. Such a model of man denies the very possibility of his being anything but a thoroughly socialized being and thus denies the reality of the Hobbesian question. Th e Freudian view of man, on the other hand, which sociologists have misrepresented, sees man as a social though never a fully socialized creature. Wrong claims that sociologists need to develop a more complex, dialectical conception of human nature instead of relying on an implicit conception that is tailor-made for special sociological problems.","PeriodicalId":349992,"journal":{"name":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teorie vědy / Theory of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2007.457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dennis H. Wrong postulates sociological theory’s origins in the asking of general questions about man and society. Th e answers lose their meaning if they are elaborated without reference to the questions, as has been the case in much contemporary theory. An example is the Hobbesian question of how men become tractable to social controls. Th e two-fold answer of contemporary theory is that man „internalizes“ social norms and seeks a favorable self-image by conforming to the „expectations“ of others. Such a model of man denies the very possibility of his being anything but a thoroughly socialized being and thus denies the reality of the Hobbesian question. Th e Freudian view of man, on the other hand, which sociologists have misrepresented, sees man as a social though never a fully socialized creature. Wrong claims that sociologists need to develop a more complex, dialectical conception of human nature instead of relying on an implicit conception that is tailor-made for special sociological problems.
丹尼斯·h·朗(Dennis H. Wrong)假定社会学理论的起源是关于人与社会的一般性问题。如果答案是在没有参考问题的情况下阐述的,那么答案就失去了意义,就像许多当代理论的情况一样。一个例子是霍布斯的问题,即人如何变得易于接受社会控制。当代理论的双重答案是,人类“内化”了社会规范,并通过符合他人的“期望”来寻求良好的自我形象。这样一种人的模式否定了人除了完全社会化之外的任何存在的可能性,从而否定了霍布斯问题的现实性。另一方面,弗洛伊德对人的看法被社会学家曲解了,他认为人虽然不是完全社会化的生物,但却是社会性的。错误的主张,社会学家需要发展一个更复杂的、辩证的人性概念,而不是依赖于一个为特殊的社会学问题量身定制的隐含概念。