FES Pressure Prediction Workflow Coupling Velocities with Geomechanical Modeling

M. Nikolinakou, M. Heidari, P. Flemings, A. Bere, J. Kato
{"title":"FES Pressure Prediction Workflow Coupling Velocities with Geomechanical Modeling","authors":"M. Nikolinakou, M. Heidari, P. Flemings, A. Bere, J. Kato","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201900518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluate the FES pressure prediction workflow using results from an evolutionary transient geomechanical model. The FES workflow couples velocities with geomechanical modeling to incorporate the effects of both mean and shear stress to pressure generation. The FES method predicts pore pressure and the full stress tensor. Because the FES workflow is iterative and requires data available on different grids (e.g., velocity vs. geomechanical results), we have developed a new tool in Horizon/Elfen to streamline the prediction process. In order to evaluate the workflow, we consider the end stage of the evolutionary model as the real basin. We use the geometry to build a static model. We use the evolutionary porosity field to calculate our real velocity field. We apply the VES method using this velocity field and the FES method using the velocity field and the static model. We find that the FES method predicts pressure values closer to the real basin pressures and performs better near a source-layer weld, where both mean and shear are non-uniaxial.","PeriodicalId":295902,"journal":{"name":"Second EAGE Workshop on Pore Pressure Prediction","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second EAGE Workshop on Pore Pressure Prediction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluate the FES pressure prediction workflow using results from an evolutionary transient geomechanical model. The FES workflow couples velocities with geomechanical modeling to incorporate the effects of both mean and shear stress to pressure generation. The FES method predicts pore pressure and the full stress tensor. Because the FES workflow is iterative and requires data available on different grids (e.g., velocity vs. geomechanical results), we have developed a new tool in Horizon/Elfen to streamline the prediction process. In order to evaluate the workflow, we consider the end stage of the evolutionary model as the real basin. We use the geometry to build a static model. We use the evolutionary porosity field to calculate our real velocity field. We apply the VES method using this velocity field and the FES method using the velocity field and the static model. We find that the FES method predicts pressure values closer to the real basin pressures and performs better near a source-layer weld, where both mean and shear are non-uniaxial.
耦合速度与地质力学建模的FES压力预测工作流
我们利用演化瞬态地质力学模型的结果来评估FES压力预测工作流程。FES工作流将速度与地质力学建模相结合,以综合平均应力和剪应力对压力产生的影响。FES方法预测了孔隙压力和全应力张量。由于FES工作流程是迭代的,并且需要不同网格上的可用数据(例如,速度与地质力学结果),因此我们在Horizon/Elfen开发了一个新工具来简化预测过程。为了评估工作流,我们将进化模型的最后阶段视为真实的盆地。我们使用几何图形来构建一个静态模型。我们用演化孔隙度场来计算实际速度场。利用该速度场,我们采用了电磁感应法,利用速度场和静态模型,我们采用了FES法。我们发现,FES方法预测的压力值更接近于真实的盆地压力,并且在源层焊缝附近表现更好,其中平均和剪切都是非单轴的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信