Environment and Sustainable Development

S. Bhattacharya
{"title":"Environment and Sustainable Development","authors":"S. Bhattacharya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3629134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protection of the environment as a concept is not a recent one and has been around since prehistoric times. In the ancient scriptures, it is said to be a responsibility (Dharma) of every human to protect nature. Lately, the movement to make sure the environmental policies are being implemented to focus on various issues such as check on pollution, protecting the wildlife and saving the forest has been focused more by the higher levels of the judiciary. These recent activisms have taken place from the legal and judicial bodies due to lack of implementation of the policies and absence of required skill amongst the executive offices. PIL( Public Interest Litigation) is one of the most used devices that has been relied upon to take care of the environmental issues, and this methodology has attracted both supporters as well as it has been criticized as well. Before the period of the 1980s, the doors of the judiciary were only available to those people who were affected could seek justice for whatever wrong has happened to them and also on behalf of any other person who was not able to seek the same, basically acting as an intermediary. The Legal system in India saw an immense change in the field of Environmental Law by phasing out the old methods and forming a new system in order to give justice fast and accurately. This period in the 1980s experienced a lot of activism by the legal, administrators and policymakers. <br><br>This paper critically evaluates the evolution of India’s environmental jurisprudence through the device of the Public Interest Litigation device and the role of the activist judiciary.","PeriodicalId":403334,"journal":{"name":"EcoRN: Conservation Ecology (Topic)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EcoRN: Conservation Ecology (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3629134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protection of the environment as a concept is not a recent one and has been around since prehistoric times. In the ancient scriptures, it is said to be a responsibility (Dharma) of every human to protect nature. Lately, the movement to make sure the environmental policies are being implemented to focus on various issues such as check on pollution, protecting the wildlife and saving the forest has been focused more by the higher levels of the judiciary. These recent activisms have taken place from the legal and judicial bodies due to lack of implementation of the policies and absence of required skill amongst the executive offices. PIL( Public Interest Litigation) is one of the most used devices that has been relied upon to take care of the environmental issues, and this methodology has attracted both supporters as well as it has been criticized as well. Before the period of the 1980s, the doors of the judiciary were only available to those people who were affected could seek justice for whatever wrong has happened to them and also on behalf of any other person who was not able to seek the same, basically acting as an intermediary. The Legal system in India saw an immense change in the field of Environmental Law by phasing out the old methods and forming a new system in order to give justice fast and accurately. This period in the 1980s experienced a lot of activism by the legal, administrators and policymakers.

This paper critically evaluates the evolution of India’s environmental jurisprudence through the device of the Public Interest Litigation device and the role of the activist judiciary.
环境与可持续发展
环境保护作为一个概念并不是最近才出现的,早在史前时代就存在了。在古代经典中,保护自然是每个人的责任(佛法)。最近,确保环境政策得到实施的运动,集中在各种问题上,如控制污染,保护野生动物和拯救森林,已经被更高级别的司法机构更多地关注。这些最近的活动发生在法律和司法机构,因为这些政策没有得到执行,行政部门也缺乏必要的技能。公益诉讼(Public Interest Litigation,公益诉讼)是最常用的处理环境问题的手段之一,这种方法既吸引了支持者,也受到了批评。在1980年代之前,司法机构的大门只向那些受影响的人开放,他们可以为自己所遭受的任何错误寻求正义,也可以代表其他无法寻求正义的人,基本上充当中间人。印度的法律制度在环境法领域发生了巨大的变化,逐步淘汰了旧的方法,形成了一个新的制度,以便迅速和准确地伸张正义。在20世纪80年代的这一时期,法律、行政和政策制定者都采取了很多行动。本文通过公益诉讼机制和维权司法的作用,批判性地评价了印度环境法理学的演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信