The Observation of Arabic Language Differentiation in the 2013 Curriculum and the "Merdeka" Curriculum

Rara Nur'aini, Mohamad Zaka Al Farisi
{"title":"The Observation of Arabic Language Differentiation in the 2013 Curriculum and the \"Merdeka\" Curriculum","authors":"Rara Nur'aini, Mohamad Zaka Al Farisi","doi":"10.18860/abj.v8i1.22359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesian education is in a transition and adaptation period from the K-13 (Kurikulum 2013/2013 Curriculum) to the KM (Kurikulum Merdeka­­/\"Merdeka\" Curriculum). So research that compares the two curricula needs to be done to understand the transition of K-13 to KM, especially in Arabic subjects. This research was descriptive-comparative-evaluative research with a content analysis design. Data collection instruments were document studies and semi-structured interviews to explore teacher perceptions regarding those two curricula. In the KM goal component, language skills are expanded into six language elements, listening (istimā'), speaking (kalām), reading-viewing (qirā'ah), and writing-presenting (kitābah). The language skills for viewing and presenting did not exist previously in the K-13. The material components in both curricula still have the same scope. K-13 uses a scientific approach in the strategy component, while KM uses a differentiated learning approach according to student achievement. Then the learning strategies in K-13 are arranged in RPP (Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran/Learning Implementation Plan), while those for KM are in teaching modules (modul ajar). Then, in the evaluation component, the KKM (Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal/Minimum Completeness Criteria) changes to the KKTP (Kriteria Ketercapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran/Learning Objectives Achievement Criteria). The information obtained from the interviews shows that the teacher has recently been given freedom in teaching, they experience confusion and are not yet ready. Teachers already understand KM theory but have not been able to implement it ideally. This lack of implementation is due to the influence of the unavailability of Arabic language textbooks based on KM, the unavailability of report cards with an assessment format based on KM, and teachers under the Kemenag (Kementerian Agama/Ministry of Religion) have been unable to take part in the program of guru penggerak (mover teachers) education program.","PeriodicalId":198227,"journal":{"name":"Abjadia : International Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abjadia : International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v8i1.22359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesian education is in a transition and adaptation period from the K-13 (Kurikulum 2013/2013 Curriculum) to the KM (Kurikulum Merdeka­­/"Merdeka" Curriculum). So research that compares the two curricula needs to be done to understand the transition of K-13 to KM, especially in Arabic subjects. This research was descriptive-comparative-evaluative research with a content analysis design. Data collection instruments were document studies and semi-structured interviews to explore teacher perceptions regarding those two curricula. In the KM goal component, language skills are expanded into six language elements, listening (istimā'), speaking (kalām), reading-viewing (qirā'ah), and writing-presenting (kitābah). The language skills for viewing and presenting did not exist previously in the K-13. The material components in both curricula still have the same scope. K-13 uses a scientific approach in the strategy component, while KM uses a differentiated learning approach according to student achievement. Then the learning strategies in K-13 are arranged in RPP (Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran/Learning Implementation Plan), while those for KM are in teaching modules (modul ajar). Then, in the evaluation component, the KKM (Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal/Minimum Completeness Criteria) changes to the KKTP (Kriteria Ketercapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran/Learning Objectives Achievement Criteria). The information obtained from the interviews shows that the teacher has recently been given freedom in teaching, they experience confusion and are not yet ready. Teachers already understand KM theory but have not been able to implement it ideally. This lack of implementation is due to the influence of the unavailability of Arabic language textbooks based on KM, the unavailability of report cards with an assessment format based on KM, and teachers under the Kemenag (Kementerian Agama/Ministry of Religion) have been unable to take part in the program of guru penggerak (mover teachers) education program.
2013年课程与“默迪卡”课程中阿拉伯语差异的观察
印尼教育正处于从K-13 (Kurikulum 2013/2013课程)到KM (Kurikulum Merdeka - /“Merdeka”课程)的过渡和适应期。因此,需要对这两种课程进行比较研究,以了解从K-13到KM的过渡,特别是在阿拉伯语科目中。本研究采用内容分析设计的描述性-比较性-评价性研究。数据收集工具是文献研究和半结构化访谈,以探讨教师对这两门课程的看法。在KM目标组件中,语言技能被扩展为六个语言元素,听力(istimi ā'),口语(kalām),阅读-观看(qiri ā'ah)和写作-呈现(kitābah)。观看和表达的语言技能在以前的K-13中并不存在。两种课程的材料组成部分仍然具有相同的范围。K-13在策略部分使用科学的方法,而KM根据学生的成绩使用差异化的学习方法。然后将K-13阶段的学习策略安排在RPP (Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran/ learning Implementation Plan)中,KM阶段的学习策略安排在教学模块(module ajar)中。然后,在评估部分,KKM (Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimum /Minimum Completeness Criteria)变为KKTP (Kriteria Ketercapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran/学习目标成就标准)。从采访中获得的信息显示,教师最近在教学中获得了自由,他们经历了困惑,还没有准备好。教师已经了解了KM理论,但还没有能够理想地实施它。缺乏实施是由于无法获得基于知识管理的阿拉伯语教科书,无法获得基于知识管理的评估格式的报告卡,以及Kemenag (Kementerian Agama/宗教部)的教师无法参加guru penggerak(移动教师)教育计划的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信