Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology

L. Schilling, M. Balthazar, Márcia Radanovic, O. Forlenza, M. Silagi, J. Smid, B. Barbosa, N. Frota, L. C. D. Souza, Francisco Assis Carvalho Vale, P. Caramelli, P. Bertolucci, Márcia Lorena Fagundes Chaves, S. Brucki, B. Damasceno, R. Nitrini
{"title":"Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology","authors":"L. Schilling, M. Balthazar, Márcia Radanovic, O. Forlenza, M. Silagi, J. Smid, B. Barbosa, N. Frota, L. C. D. Souza, Francisco Assis Carvalho Vale, P. Caramelli, P. Bertolucci, Márcia Lorena Fagundes Chaves, S. Brucki, B. Damasceno, R. Nitrini","doi":"10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2022-s102en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents the consensus of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging from the Brazilian Academy of Neurology on the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in Brazil. The authors conducted a literature review regarding clinical and research criteria for AD diagnosis and proposed protocols for use at primary, secondary, and tertiary care levels. Within this clinical scenario, the diagnostic criteria for typical and atypical AD are presented as well as clinical, cognitive, and functional assessment tools and complementary propaedeutics with laboratory and neuroimaging tests. The use of biomarkers is also discussed for both clinical diagnosis (in specific conditions) and research.","PeriodicalId":167803,"journal":{"name":"Dementia & Neuropsychologia","volume":"43 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia & Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2022-s102en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents the consensus of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging from the Brazilian Academy of Neurology on the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in Brazil. The authors conducted a literature review regarding clinical and research criteria for AD diagnosis and proposed protocols for use at primary, secondary, and tertiary care levels. Within this clinical scenario, the diagnostic criteria for typical and atypical AD are presented as well as clinical, cognitive, and functional assessment tools and complementary propaedeutics with laboratory and neuroimaging tests. The use of biomarkers is also discussed for both clinical diagnosis (in specific conditions) and research.
阿尔茨海默病的诊断:巴西神经病学学会认知神经病学和衰老科学部的建议
摘要:本文介绍了巴西神经病学学会认知神经病学与衰老科学部对巴西阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断标准的共识。作者对阿尔茨海默病诊断的临床和研究标准进行了文献综述,并提出了在初级、二级和三级保健水平上使用的方案。在这个临床场景中,提出了典型和非典型AD的诊断标准,以及临床、认知和功能评估工具,以及与实验室和神经影像学检查相补充的预防方法。在临床诊断(在特定条件下)和研究中也讨论了生物标志物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信