An Analytical Study of Nodleke and Atto Loth’s Thoughts about Mystical Letters

Sumera Rabia, Syeda Sadia
{"title":"An Analytical Study of Nodleke and Atto Loth’s Thoughts about Mystical Letters","authors":"Sumera Rabia, Syeda Sadia","doi":"10.46600/ALMILAL.V2I2.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"حروف مقطعات کے حوالے سے مستشرق  نولڈ یکے  اور آٹو لوتھ کی آراء کا  تجزیاتی مطالعہ \nMystical letters are among the miracles of Quran. These mystical letters are present at the start of Quranic Surah’s (Chapters). These are among the mutashabihat (Analogies) of Quran. Muslim scholars tried to define their meanings. Like other aspects of Quran and Hadith orientalists talk about mystical letters of the Quran. This article analyses the theories of Noldeke and Otto Loth regarding mysterious letters of Quran. What are their views about mystical letters of the Quran? Are their views according to the Islamic point of view of mystical letters? What are the deviations and differences as compared to traditional Islamic point of view of mystical letters? This research has been analytical by nature, both qualitative and analytical methods have been implemented.  Analyses of the views of both of the scholars in the light of traditional Islamic concept of mystical letters, shows that Orientalists including Noldeke and Otto Loth thought that mystical letters are not the part of revelation. According to them these are the names of the sources from which different chapters of the Quran had been taken during its compilation. These are on the same pattern as mystical letters are present in the Jewish books. Holy Prophet had copied them. The present study argues that Quran being the book of Lord is unchanged and mystical letters are a part of it. It is further highlighted that even some orientalists argue that the opinion of Noldeke and Otto Loth is not correct.","PeriodicalId":354292,"journal":{"name":"Al-Milal: Journal of Religion and Thought","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Milal: Journal of Religion and Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46600/ALMILAL.V2I2.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

حروف مقطعات کے حوالے سے مستشرق  نولڈ یکے  اور آٹو لوتھ کی آراء کا  تجزیاتی مطالعہ Mystical letters are among the miracles of Quran. These mystical letters are present at the start of Quranic Surah’s (Chapters). These are among the mutashabihat (Analogies) of Quran. Muslim scholars tried to define their meanings. Like other aspects of Quran and Hadith orientalists talk about mystical letters of the Quran. This article analyses the theories of Noldeke and Otto Loth regarding mysterious letters of Quran. What are their views about mystical letters of the Quran? Are their views according to the Islamic point of view of mystical letters? What are the deviations and differences as compared to traditional Islamic point of view of mystical letters? This research has been analytical by nature, both qualitative and analytical methods have been implemented.  Analyses of the views of both of the scholars in the light of traditional Islamic concept of mystical letters, shows that Orientalists including Noldeke and Otto Loth thought that mystical letters are not the part of revelation. According to them these are the names of the sources from which different chapters of the Quran had been taken during its compilation. These are on the same pattern as mystical letters are present in the Jewish books. Holy Prophet had copied them. The present study argues that Quran being the book of Lord is unchanged and mystical letters are a part of it. It is further highlighted that even some orientalists argue that the opinion of Noldeke and Otto Loth is not correct.
诺德勒克与阿托洛思神秘文学思想分析
حروفمقطعاتکےحوالےسےمستشرقنولڈیکےاورآٹولوتھکیآراءکاتجزیاتیمطالعہ神秘信件是古兰经的奇迹之一。这些神秘的字母出现在《古兰经》章节的开头。这些都是《古兰经》中的mutashabihat(类比)。穆斯林学者试图定义它们的含义。就像《古兰经》和圣训的其他方面一样,东方学家谈论《古兰经》的神秘字母。本文分析了诺德克和奥托·洛思关于古兰经神秘文字的理论。他们对古兰经的神秘字母有什么看法?他们的观点是否符合伊斯兰教对神秘字母的观点?与传统的伊斯兰观点相比,神秘字母的偏差和差异是什么?本研究本质上是分析性的,采用了定性和分析两种方法。从伊斯兰传统的神秘字母概念出发分析两位学者的观点,可以看出,包括诺尔德克和奥托·洛思在内的东方学家认为神秘字母不是启示的一部分。根据他们的说法,这些是《古兰经》在编撰过程中取自不同章节的资料来源的名字。这些字母与犹太经书中神秘字母的样式相同。圣先知抄袭了他们。目前的研究认为,古兰经是主的书是不变的,神秘字母是其中的一部分。进一步强调的是,甚至一些东方学家也认为诺尔德克和奥托·洛思的观点是不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信