Adding nuclear rhodopsin data where mitochondrial COI indicates discrepancies – can this marker help to explain conflicts in cyprinids?

DNA Barcodes Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1515/DNA-2015-0020
S. Behrens-Chapuis, F. Herder, H. Esmaeili, J. Freyhof, N. Hamidan, M. Özuluğ, R. Šanda, M. Geiger
{"title":"Adding nuclear rhodopsin data where mitochondrial COI indicates discrepancies – can this marker help to explain conflicts in cyprinids?","authors":"S. Behrens-Chapuis, F. Herder, H. Esmaeili, J. Freyhof, N. Hamidan, M. Özuluğ, R. Šanda, M. Geiger","doi":"10.1515/DNA-2015-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DNA barcoding is a fast and reliable tool for species identification, and has been successfully applied to a wide range of freshwater fishes. The limitations reported were mainly attributed to effects of geographic scale, taxon-sampling, incomplete lineage sorting, or mitochondrial introgression. However, the metrics for the success of assigning unknown samples to species or genera also depend on a suited taxonomic framework. A simultaneous use of the mitochondrial COI and the nuclear RHO gene turned out to be advantageous for the barcode efficiency in a few previous studies. Here, we examine 14 cyprinid fish genera, with a total of 74 species, where standard DNA barcoding failed to identify closely related species unambiguously. Eight of the genera (Acanthobrama, Alburnus, Chondrostoma, Gobio, Mirogrex, Phoxinus, Scardinius, and Squalius) contain species that exhibit very low interspecific divergence, Research Article Open Access © 2015 S. Behrens-Chapuis et al. licensee De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. S. Behrens-Chapuis*, F. Herder, H. R. Esmaeili, J. Freyhof, N. A. Hamidan, M. Özuluğ, R. Šanda, M. F. Geiger Adding nuclear rhodopsin data where mitochondrial COI indicates discrepancies – can this marker help to explain conflicts in cyprinids? *Corresponding author: S. Behrens-Chapuis, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany, E-mail: sichapuis@t-online.de F. Herder, M. F. Geiger, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany H. R. Esmaeili, Ichthyology Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran J. Freyhof, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany N. A. Hamidan, The Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature – Conservation Division, P.O. Box 1215, Jubaiha 11941, Jordan and Centre for Conservation Ecology and Environmental Science, School of Applied Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, U.K. M. Özuluğ, Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, 34134 Vezneciler, Istanbul, Turkey R. Šanda, National Museum, Václavské nám. 68, 115 79 Prague, Czech Republic Unauthenticated Download Date | 7/20/18 5:52 AM 188 S. Behrens-Chapuis, et al. has been considered that the mental disc in labeonine cyprinids has evolved and been reduced independently in several lineages [29]. This new hypothesis was supported by phylogenetic analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial genes in labeonines by Yang et al. [30]. Likewise, mtCOI-based findings in Hamidan et al. [31] and Geiger et al. [10] showed the same pattern with different labeonine genera (defined by the mental disc apparatus) to be nested within Garra, which could be explained by past hybridization events. This pheneticmitochondrial incongruence in the Garra species complex represents an ideal case to be examined by an additional genetic marker with different evolutionary rate and genomic position. Several studies have tried to overcome uncertainties in species identification derived from analysing exclusively the mtCOI region by supplementing this marker with nuclear sequences [32-35]. The nuclear rhodopsin gene (ncRHO) is an intronless gene [36], which has been recommended for teleost fishes by Sevilla et al. [37], and been applied in different phylogenetic analyses [30,38,39]. A first comparison of mtCOI to ncRHO for species identification in billfishes revealed a discrepancy between both markers in the species-complex of white and striped marlin [40]. A direct comparison of individuals where sequences for both loci were available revealed that those, which are distinguishable by mtCOI lack a clear separation by the nuclear marker and vice versa [40]. In French chubs mtCOI clearly separated the common chub S. cephalus from the Catalan chub S. laietanus by revealing two divergent haplotype clusters, whereas the topology based on nuclear rhodopsin was uncertain, showing nine different haplotypes with neither correspondence to taxonomy, nor to geography [41]. When identifying cyprinids in the aquarium trade, nuclear rhodopsin results were broadly consistent with mtCOI patterns and morphology although ncRHO failed to distinguish closely related species, but proved to be useful to uncover hybridisation between various species of barbs in the ornamental trade sector [42]. Following the three previously mentioned direct comparisons of mtCOI and ncRHO, we first address the question whether the ncRHO marker has the potential to improve species identification where the taxonomic resolution of mtCOI in cyprinid fishes was not sufficient. We include cases where species exhibit mtCOI barcodes with low interspecific divergence, haplotype sharing or potential introgression ([10], Table S2C). The second focus of this study is on labeonine cyprinid genera, where members of Crossocheilus, Hemigrammocapoeta, barcoding proved to be a powerful and reliable tool for discriminating a large range of species, including all major taxa of marine as well as freshwater fishes [e.g. 1,5-12]. The tool has gained additional attention among biologists by having the potential to reveal cryptic diversity, especially given the enormous amount of data collected globally, which can easily be used to compare own sequence data on a regional scale. A high level of intraspecific mtCOI divergence is a likely indicator for cryptic diversity, i.e. putative new, or unrecognized species, pronounced phylogeographic structure, but might also result from introgressive hybridization [1015]. The potential of DNA barcoding appears promising, but has not been without controversy. The latter centred on either the suitability of mtCOI as universal marker, or the most meaningful method to delineate species based on molecular data [16-18]. The possibility to distinguish species unambiguously by DNA barcoding depends on the sequence variation within and between the taxa studied. Freshwater fishes, and in particular members of the speciose family Cyprinidae (minnows, carps), are among the animals known for high rates of hybridization and introgression [19-22]. Hybridization may lead to the transfer of mitochondrial DNA into heterospecific populations (i.e. introgression); the mismatch of nuclear population structure and mitochondrial haplotypes may confound analyses based solely on mitochondrial markers, and lead to misidentifications in barcoding routines [6,23]. Here, we focus on cyprinid species that exhibited low interspecific divergence, or haplotype sharing based on mtCOI data in previous studies [10,12]; these allow to critically assess the potential to resolve taxonomic conflicts as well as the discrimination capacity of the nuclear rhodopsin marker (ncRHO). Cyprinids are the most species-rich family of vertebrates in freshwaters of Eurasia, Africa, and North America [24,25]. Some of the species, like the common carp, the goldfish, or the zebrafish, have substantial commercial cultural and/or scientific importance, whereas the vast majority of the cyprinid species remain known only to a few specialists [26,27]. In order to evaluate the potential of ncRHO to resolve an ongoing taxonomic dispute, we also include labeonine cyprinids (Garra and related genera), characterized by the presence or absence of a conspicuous adhesive organ, the mental disc apparatus. A small or absent disc was interpreted as ancestral character state, whereas a completely developed disc was considered the derived state [28]. More recently, and based on several nuclear genes, it Unauthenticated Download Date | 7/20/18 5:52 AM Adding nuclear rhodopsin data where mitochondrial COI indicates discrepancies ... 189 in a second attempt. The nuclear rhodopsin data were generated using the primers RH 28F [39] and RH 1039R [38]. PCR conditions for both markers using Qiagen Multiplex ® taq were as follows: 15min at 95.0°C; 10 cycles of 35s at 94.0°C, 90s at 52.0-49.0°C (“touch-down”) and 90 s at 72.0°C followed by 25 cycles of 35 s at 94.0°C, 90 s at 55.0°C and 90 s at 72.0°C; 10 min at 72.0°C and hold at 10.0°C. The purified PCR products were sent to Macrogen Europe Laboratories for standard Sanger sequencing in both.","PeriodicalId":446240,"journal":{"name":"DNA Barcodes","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DNA Barcodes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/DNA-2015-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

DNA barcoding is a fast and reliable tool for species identification, and has been successfully applied to a wide range of freshwater fishes. The limitations reported were mainly attributed to effects of geographic scale, taxon-sampling, incomplete lineage sorting, or mitochondrial introgression. However, the metrics for the success of assigning unknown samples to species or genera also depend on a suited taxonomic framework. A simultaneous use of the mitochondrial COI and the nuclear RHO gene turned out to be advantageous for the barcode efficiency in a few previous studies. Here, we examine 14 cyprinid fish genera, with a total of 74 species, where standard DNA barcoding failed to identify closely related species unambiguously. Eight of the genera (Acanthobrama, Alburnus, Chondrostoma, Gobio, Mirogrex, Phoxinus, Scardinius, and Squalius) contain species that exhibit very low interspecific divergence, Research Article Open Access © 2015 S. Behrens-Chapuis et al. licensee De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. S. Behrens-Chapuis*, F. Herder, H. R. Esmaeili, J. Freyhof, N. A. Hamidan, M. Özuluğ, R. Šanda, M. F. Geiger Adding nuclear rhodopsin data where mitochondrial COI indicates discrepancies – can this marker help to explain conflicts in cyprinids? *Corresponding author: S. Behrens-Chapuis, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany, E-mail: sichapuis@t-online.de F. Herder, M. F. Geiger, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany H. R. Esmaeili, Ichthyology Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran J. Freyhof, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany N. A. Hamidan, The Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature – Conservation Division, P.O. Box 1215, Jubaiha 11941, Jordan and Centre for Conservation Ecology and Environmental Science, School of Applied Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, U.K. M. Özuluğ, Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, 34134 Vezneciler, Istanbul, Turkey R. Šanda, National Museum, Václavské nám. 68, 115 79 Prague, Czech Republic Unauthenticated Download Date | 7/20/18 5:52 AM 188 S. Behrens-Chapuis, et al. has been considered that the mental disc in labeonine cyprinids has evolved and been reduced independently in several lineages [29]. This new hypothesis was supported by phylogenetic analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial genes in labeonines by Yang et al. [30]. Likewise, mtCOI-based findings in Hamidan et al. [31] and Geiger et al. [10] showed the same pattern with different labeonine genera (defined by the mental disc apparatus) to be nested within Garra, which could be explained by past hybridization events. This pheneticmitochondrial incongruence in the Garra species complex represents an ideal case to be examined by an additional genetic marker with different evolutionary rate and genomic position. Several studies have tried to overcome uncertainties in species identification derived from analysing exclusively the mtCOI region by supplementing this marker with nuclear sequences [32-35]. The nuclear rhodopsin gene (ncRHO) is an intronless gene [36], which has been recommended for teleost fishes by Sevilla et al. [37], and been applied in different phylogenetic analyses [30,38,39]. A first comparison of mtCOI to ncRHO for species identification in billfishes revealed a discrepancy between both markers in the species-complex of white and striped marlin [40]. A direct comparison of individuals where sequences for both loci were available revealed that those, which are distinguishable by mtCOI lack a clear separation by the nuclear marker and vice versa [40]. In French chubs mtCOI clearly separated the common chub S. cephalus from the Catalan chub S. laietanus by revealing two divergent haplotype clusters, whereas the topology based on nuclear rhodopsin was uncertain, showing nine different haplotypes with neither correspondence to taxonomy, nor to geography [41]. When identifying cyprinids in the aquarium trade, nuclear rhodopsin results were broadly consistent with mtCOI patterns and morphology although ncRHO failed to distinguish closely related species, but proved to be useful to uncover hybridisation between various species of barbs in the ornamental trade sector [42]. Following the three previously mentioned direct comparisons of mtCOI and ncRHO, we first address the question whether the ncRHO marker has the potential to improve species identification where the taxonomic resolution of mtCOI in cyprinid fishes was not sufficient. We include cases where species exhibit mtCOI barcodes with low interspecific divergence, haplotype sharing or potential introgression ([10], Table S2C). The second focus of this study is on labeonine cyprinid genera, where members of Crossocheilus, Hemigrammocapoeta, barcoding proved to be a powerful and reliable tool for discriminating a large range of species, including all major taxa of marine as well as freshwater fishes [e.g. 1,5-12]. The tool has gained additional attention among biologists by having the potential to reveal cryptic diversity, especially given the enormous amount of data collected globally, which can easily be used to compare own sequence data on a regional scale. A high level of intraspecific mtCOI divergence is a likely indicator for cryptic diversity, i.e. putative new, or unrecognized species, pronounced phylogeographic structure, but might also result from introgressive hybridization [1015]. The potential of DNA barcoding appears promising, but has not been without controversy. The latter centred on either the suitability of mtCOI as universal marker, or the most meaningful method to delineate species based on molecular data [16-18]. The possibility to distinguish species unambiguously by DNA barcoding depends on the sequence variation within and between the taxa studied. Freshwater fishes, and in particular members of the speciose family Cyprinidae (minnows, carps), are among the animals known for high rates of hybridization and introgression [19-22]. Hybridization may lead to the transfer of mitochondrial DNA into heterospecific populations (i.e. introgression); the mismatch of nuclear population structure and mitochondrial haplotypes may confound analyses based solely on mitochondrial markers, and lead to misidentifications in barcoding routines [6,23]. Here, we focus on cyprinid species that exhibited low interspecific divergence, or haplotype sharing based on mtCOI data in previous studies [10,12]; these allow to critically assess the potential to resolve taxonomic conflicts as well as the discrimination capacity of the nuclear rhodopsin marker (ncRHO). Cyprinids are the most species-rich family of vertebrates in freshwaters of Eurasia, Africa, and North America [24,25]. Some of the species, like the common carp, the goldfish, or the zebrafish, have substantial commercial cultural and/or scientific importance, whereas the vast majority of the cyprinid species remain known only to a few specialists [26,27]. In order to evaluate the potential of ncRHO to resolve an ongoing taxonomic dispute, we also include labeonine cyprinids (Garra and related genera), characterized by the presence or absence of a conspicuous adhesive organ, the mental disc apparatus. A small or absent disc was interpreted as ancestral character state, whereas a completely developed disc was considered the derived state [28]. More recently, and based on several nuclear genes, it Unauthenticated Download Date | 7/20/18 5:52 AM Adding nuclear rhodopsin data where mitochondrial COI indicates discrepancies ... 189 in a second attempt. The nuclear rhodopsin data were generated using the primers RH 28F [39] and RH 1039R [38]. PCR conditions for both markers using Qiagen Multiplex ® taq were as follows: 15min at 95.0°C; 10 cycles of 35s at 94.0°C, 90s at 52.0-49.0°C (“touch-down”) and 90 s at 72.0°C followed by 25 cycles of 35 s at 94.0°C, 90 s at 55.0°C and 90 s at 72.0°C; 10 min at 72.0°C and hold at 10.0°C. The purified PCR products were sent to Macrogen Europe Laboratories for standard Sanger sequencing in both.
添加核视紫红质数据,其中线粒体COI表明差异-这个标记可以帮助解释鲤科动物的冲突吗?
DNA条形码技术是一种快速、可靠的物种鉴定工具,已成功应用于多种淡水鱼类。报告的局限性主要归因于地理尺度、分类单元取样、不完整的谱系分类或线粒体渗入的影响。然而,将未知样本成功划分为种或属的标准也取决于合适的分类框架。在之前的一些研究中,线粒体COI和核RHO基因同时使用有利于条形码效率的提高。在这里,我们研究了14种鲤科鱼类,共有74种,其中标准DNA条形码无法明确识别近亲物种。其中8个属(Acanthobrama, Alburnus, Chondrostoma, Gobio, Mirogrex, Phoxinus, Scardinius和Squalius)包含的物种表现出非常低的种间差异,研究文章开放获取©2015 S. behren - chapuis等人许可De Gruyter Open。本作品采用知识共享署名-非商业-禁止衍生3.0许可协议。S. Behrens-Chapuis*, F. Herder, H. R. Esmaeili, J. Freyhof, N. A. Hamidan, M. Özuluğ, R. Šanda, M. F. Geiger添加核视紫红质数据,其中线粒体COI指示差异-这一标记是否有助于解释鲤科动物的冲突?*通讯作者:S. Behrens-Chapuis, zoologches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz动物生物多样性研究所,Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany, E-mail:sichapuis@t-online.de F. Herder, M. F. Geiger, zoologches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig,莱布尼茨动物生物多样性研究所,Adenauerallee 160, 53113波恩,德国设拉子大学理学院生物系鱼类学研究实验室,伊朗设拉子J. Freyhof,德国综合生物多样性研究中心(iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig,德意志广场5a, 04103德国莱比锡N. A. Hamidan,英国皇家自然保护学会-保护部,约旦Jubaiha 11941邮政信箱1215号,伯恩茅斯大学应用科学学院保护生态与环境科学中心,Poole, bh125bb, U.K. . M. Özuluğ,伊斯坦布尔大学理学院,生物系,土耳其伊斯坦布尔Vezneciler 34134号Šanda,国家博物馆,Václavské nám。S. Behrens-Chapuis等人认为,labeonine鲤科动物的精神盘在几个谱系中是独立进化和减少的。Yang等人对labeonines的核和线粒体基因的系统发育分析支持了这一新的假设。同样,在Hamidan et al.[31]和Geiger et al.[10]中基于mtcoi的研究结果显示,在Garra中嵌套的不同的labeonine属(由精神盘仪定义)也显示了相同的模式,这可以通过过去的杂交事件来解释。加拉物种复合体中的这种表型线粒体不一致代表了一个理想的情况,可以通过具有不同进化速率和基因组位置的额外遗传标记进行检查。一些研究试图通过补充核序列来克服由于只分析mtCOI区域而产生的物种鉴定中的不确定性[32-35]。核视紫红质基因(nuclear rhodopsin gene, ncRHO)是一种无内含子基因[36],Sevilla等人推荐将其用于硬骨鱼,并应用于不同的系统发育分析[30,38,39]。首次比较了mtCOI和ncRHO在长嘴鱼物种鉴定中的差异,发现这两种标记在白色和条纹马林鱼bbb的物种复合体中存在差异。对两个基因座序列均可获得的个体进行的直接比较显示,那些可由mtCOI区分的个体缺乏核标记的明确分离,反之亦然。在法国鱼中,mtCOI通过显示两个不同的单倍型簇,明确地将普通的头鱼和加泰罗尼亚鱼分开,而基于核视紫红质的拓扑结构不确定,显示出9个不同的单倍型,既不符合分类,也不符合地理[41]。在鉴定水族馆贸易中的鲤类时,核视紫红质结果与mtCOI模式和形态大致一致,尽管ncRHO未能区分近亲物种,但被证明有助于揭示观赏贸易部门各种倒钩之间的杂交。在前面提到的mtCOI和ncRHO的三种直接比较之后,我们首先讨论了ncRHO标记是否有潜力改善鲤科鱼类中mtCOI的分类分辨率不足的物种鉴定。 我们纳入了物种mtCOI条形码具有低种间差异、单倍型共享或潜在渗入的情况([10],表S2C)。本研究的第二个重点是labeonine cyprinid属,其中Crossocheilus, Hemigrammocapoeta的成员,条形码被证明是一种强大而可靠的工具,用于区分大范围的物种,包括所有主要的海洋和淡水鱼分类群[例如1,5-12]。该工具已经获得了生物学家的额外关注,因为它有可能揭示隐藏的多样性,特别是考虑到全球收集的大量数据,可以很容易地用于比较区域范围内自己的序列数据。高水平的种内mtCOI差异可能是隐性多样性的一个指标,即假设的新物种或未被识别的物种,明显的系统地理结构,但也可能是渐进杂交的结果[1015]。DNA条形码的潜力看起来很有希望,但也并非没有争议。后者要么集中于mtCOI作为通用标记的适用性,要么集中于基于分子数据描述物种的最有意义的方法[16-18]。通过DNA条形码明确区分物种的可能性取决于所研究的分类群内部和之间的序列差异。淡水鱼,特别是鲤科物种(小鱼、鲤鱼)的成员,是杂交和基因渗入率高的动物之一[19-22]。杂交可能导致线粒体DNA转移到异种群体中(即基因渗入);核种群结构和线粒体单倍型的不匹配可能会混淆仅基于线粒体标记的分析,并导致条形码程序中的错误识别[6,23]。在这里,我们关注的是以往研究中基于mtCOI数据表现出低种间差异或单倍型共享的鲤科物种[10,12];这些可以批判性地评估解决分类冲突的潜力以及核视紫红质标记物(ncRHO)的识别能力。鲤科动物是欧亚大陆、非洲和北美淡水中种类最丰富的脊椎动物[24,25]。其中一些物种,如鲤鱼、金鱼或斑马鱼,具有重要的商业文化和/或科学意义,而绝大多数鲤科物种仍然只有少数专家知道[26,27]。为了评估ncRHO的潜力,以解决正在进行的分类学争议,我们还包括labeonine cyprinids (Garra及相关属),其特征是存在或不存在明显的粘附器官,即精神盘装置。小或缺失的椎间盘被解释为祖先特征状态,而完全发育的椎间盘被认为是衍生状态[28]。最近,基于几个核基因,它添加核紫红质数据,其中线粒体COI表明差异…第二次尝试189分。核紫红质数据使用引物RH 28F[39]和RH 1039R[38]生成。使用Qiagen Multiplex®taq对两种标记进行PCR的条件为:在95.0°C下,15min;在94.0℃下循环35s,在52.0-49.0℃下循环90s(“触地”),在72.0℃下循环90s,然后在94.0℃下循环35s,在55.0℃下循环90s,在72.0℃下循环25 s;在72.0°C下保持10分钟,在10.0°C下保持。纯化的PCR产物被送到Macrogen欧洲实验室进行标准的桑格测序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信