Quadratic Integration-exploited Model Predictive Current Control (QI-MPCC)-based Flying-Capacitor-Clamped Multilevel Converter (FCCMC)

Sanghun Choi, A. Meliopoulos
{"title":"Quadratic Integration-exploited Model Predictive Current Control (QI-MPCC)-based Flying-Capacitor-Clamped Multilevel Converter (FCCMC)","authors":"Sanghun Choi, A. Meliopoulos","doi":"10.1109/ISIE45552.2021.9576287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The flying-capacitor-clamped multilevel converter (FCCMC) has inherent converter-leg redundant switching combinations per reference multilevel (intermediate levels) voltage due to its flying capacitors clamped to serially-connected switches. Also, it has the least hardware and control complexity among multilevel converters. Hence, FCCMC is the most prominent among multilevel converters in several-hundred-kVA and low-nominal-DC-voltage power applications. Compared to the classic linearized closed-loop controls, the model predictive current control (MPCC) provides improved closed-loop control performance and achieves multiple linear/nonlinear control objectives parallelly through a discrete mathematical model-based predicted cost-function optimization approach utilizing a finite switching combination set based on the space vector control. Hence, MPCC further enhances the FCCMC's advantages in the above DC-voltage and power ranges. But, the ordinary MPCC predicts the cost functions based on the implicit Euler method. It yields inferior closed-loop control performance unless the sampling rate is impractically high enough because the implicit Euler method is order-one accurate. This paper proposes a new MPCC methodology exploiting the quadratic integration (QI) method, QI-MPCC, for FCCMC. The QI method has an order-four accuracy by utilizing three collocation points in the cost function prediction. Therefore, it significantly improves the closed-loop control performance of MPCC-based FCCMC without requesting an impractically high sampling rate. Simulation results demonstrate the steady-state and dynamic performance of the proposed methodology.","PeriodicalId":365956,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE45552.2021.9576287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The flying-capacitor-clamped multilevel converter (FCCMC) has inherent converter-leg redundant switching combinations per reference multilevel (intermediate levels) voltage due to its flying capacitors clamped to serially-connected switches. Also, it has the least hardware and control complexity among multilevel converters. Hence, FCCMC is the most prominent among multilevel converters in several-hundred-kVA and low-nominal-DC-voltage power applications. Compared to the classic linearized closed-loop controls, the model predictive current control (MPCC) provides improved closed-loop control performance and achieves multiple linear/nonlinear control objectives parallelly through a discrete mathematical model-based predicted cost-function optimization approach utilizing a finite switching combination set based on the space vector control. Hence, MPCC further enhances the FCCMC's advantages in the above DC-voltage and power ranges. But, the ordinary MPCC predicts the cost functions based on the implicit Euler method. It yields inferior closed-loop control performance unless the sampling rate is impractically high enough because the implicit Euler method is order-one accurate. This paper proposes a new MPCC methodology exploiting the quadratic integration (QI) method, QI-MPCC, for FCCMC. The QI method has an order-four accuracy by utilizing three collocation points in the cost function prediction. Therefore, it significantly improves the closed-loop control performance of MPCC-based FCCMC without requesting an impractically high sampling rate. Simulation results demonstrate the steady-state and dynamic performance of the proposed methodology.
基于二次积分利用模型预测电流控制(QI-MPCC)的飞容箝位多电平变换器(FCCMC)
飞容箝位多电平变换器(FCCMC)由于其飞容箝位在串行连接的开关上,因此每个参考多电平(中间电平)电压具有固有的变换器分支冗余开关组合。在多电平变换器中硬件和控制复杂度最低。因此,FCCMC在几百千伏安和低标称直流电压功率应用中的多电平变换器中是最突出的。与经典的线性化闭环控制相比,模型预测电流控制(MPCC)通过基于空间矢量控制的有限开关组合集的基于离散数学模型的预测成本函数优化方法,提供了更好的闭环控制性能,并实现了多个线性/非线性控制目标并行。因此,MPCC进一步增强了FCCMC在上述直流电压和功率范围内的优势。而普通的MPCC是基于隐式欧拉法来预测成本函数的。由于隐式欧拉方法的精度为一阶,除非采样率过高,否则其闭环控制性能较差。本文利用二次积分(QI)方法,提出了一种用于FCCMC的新的MPCC方法——QI-MPCC。QI方法通过在成本函数预测中使用三个搭配点,具有四阶精度。因此,在不要求不切实际的高采样率的情况下,显著提高了基于mpcc的FCCMC的闭环控制性能。仿真结果验证了该方法的稳态和动态性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信