A study to assess the impact of appropriate intervention/s on compliance w.r.t. key hospital infection control parameters in dialysis unit of a tertiary healthcare teaching institute in India

R. Harsvardhan, Ruchi Kushwaha, Richa Mishra, N. Prasad
{"title":"A study to assess the impact of appropriate intervention/s on compliance w.r.t. key hospital infection control parameters in dialysis unit of a tertiary healthcare teaching institute in India","authors":"R. Harsvardhan, Ruchi Kushwaha, Richa Mishra, N. Prasad","doi":"10.4103/jigims.jigims_6_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of appropriate interventions on key infection control parameters subsequent to baseline assessment in dialysis unit with objectives to ascertain the current status of knowledge, attitude, and practice for key hospital infection control (HIC) parameters, to develop and execute appropriate interventions, to assess the impact of interventions, and to recommend an evidence-based HIC module. Methodology: An interventional, longitudinal study was conducted from April 2018 to May 2019 in dialysis unit of SGPGI. Study samples were nurses and technicians. The questionnaire was designed to assess knowledge and attitude. To evaluate practices, a checklist was drafted and graduated by scoring from 0 to 10. Interventions made were on-site training and workshop, IEC, and placement of alcohol-based hand rub. Data analysis was done by SPSS 23. For normally distributed data of the study, Descriptive Statistics was presented in the form of mean ± 2 standard deviation. Paired Sample t-test was used to compare the mean score and Chi Square test was used to compare the Knowledge between pre and post-intervention. Results: The overall improvement in knowledge was from 55% to 70% (P = 0.017–0.000). For attitude, the mean scores changed from 4.61 ± 0.562, 4.63 ± 0.582, 4.40 ± 0.756, and 4.36 ± 0.889 to 69 ± 0.493, 4.76 ± 0.428, 4.73 ± 0.449, and 4.64 ± 0.621. Regarding practices, prior to intervention, the mean scores were 20.49 ± 5.699, 48.75 ± 18.185, 63.25 ± 22.376, and 23.03 ± 10.036, and following intervention, it was found to be 22.98 ± 6.614 (2.49% increase, t = −2.990; P = 0.004), 52.81 ± 19.074 (4.06% increase, t = −1.473; P = 0.145), 68.00 ± 21.955 (4.75% increase, t = −1.472; P = 0.145), and 31.06 ± 13.400 (8.03% increase, t = −4.270; P = 0.000). Conclusions: Hemodialysis patients are vulnerable to severe infections for many reasons in dialysis setting including the failure to comply with appropriate hand hygiene, contamination of the instrument, or improper disinfection practices.","PeriodicalId":129352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indira Gandhi Institute Of Medical Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indira Gandhi Institute Of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jigims.jigims_6_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of appropriate interventions on key infection control parameters subsequent to baseline assessment in dialysis unit with objectives to ascertain the current status of knowledge, attitude, and practice for key hospital infection control (HIC) parameters, to develop and execute appropriate interventions, to assess the impact of interventions, and to recommend an evidence-based HIC module. Methodology: An interventional, longitudinal study was conducted from April 2018 to May 2019 in dialysis unit of SGPGI. Study samples were nurses and technicians. The questionnaire was designed to assess knowledge and attitude. To evaluate practices, a checklist was drafted and graduated by scoring from 0 to 10. Interventions made were on-site training and workshop, IEC, and placement of alcohol-based hand rub. Data analysis was done by SPSS 23. For normally distributed data of the study, Descriptive Statistics was presented in the form of mean ± 2 standard deviation. Paired Sample t-test was used to compare the mean score and Chi Square test was used to compare the Knowledge between pre and post-intervention. Results: The overall improvement in knowledge was from 55% to 70% (P = 0.017–0.000). For attitude, the mean scores changed from 4.61 ± 0.562, 4.63 ± 0.582, 4.40 ± 0.756, and 4.36 ± 0.889 to 69 ± 0.493, 4.76 ± 0.428, 4.73 ± 0.449, and 4.64 ± 0.621. Regarding practices, prior to intervention, the mean scores were 20.49 ± 5.699, 48.75 ± 18.185, 63.25 ± 22.376, and 23.03 ± 10.036, and following intervention, it was found to be 22.98 ± 6.614 (2.49% increase, t = −2.990; P = 0.004), 52.81 ± 19.074 (4.06% increase, t = −1.473; P = 0.145), 68.00 ± 21.955 (4.75% increase, t = −1.472; P = 0.145), and 31.06 ± 13.400 (8.03% increase, t = −4.270; P = 0.000). Conclusions: Hemodialysis patients are vulnerable to severe infections for many reasons in dialysis setting including the failure to comply with appropriate hand hygiene, contamination of the instrument, or improper disinfection practices.
评估适当干预措施对印度一家三级医疗保健教学机构透析单元的依从性影响的研究
目的:本研究的目的是评估透析单元基线评估后适当干预对关键感染控制参数的影响,目的是确定当前医院感染控制(HIC)关键参数的知识、态度和实践状况,制定和实施适当的干预措施,评估干预措施的影响,并推荐循证HIC模块。方法:于2018年4月至2019年5月在SGPGI透析单元进行介入性纵向研究。研究对象为护士和技术人员。该问卷旨在评估知识和态度。为了评估实践,起草了一份检查表,并通过从0到10的评分来毕业。所采取的干预措施包括现场培训和讲习班、信息教育和放置含酒精的免洗洗手液。数据分析采用SPSS 23软件。对于正态分布的研究数据,描述性统计以均数±2标准差的形式表示。采用配对样本t检验比较均分,采用卡方检验比较干预前后的Knowledge。结果:总体知识水平提高55% ~ 70% (P = 0.017 ~ 0.000)。态度的平均得分分别为4.61±0.562、4.63±0.582、4.40±0.756、4.36±0.889 ~ 69±0.493、4.76±0.428、4.73±0.449、4.64±0.621。干预前平均得分为20.49±5.699分、48.75±18.185分、63.25±22.376分、23.03±10.036分,干预后平均得分为22.98±6.614分(增加2.49%,t = - 2.990;P = 0.004), 52.81±19.074(上升4.06%,t =−1.473;P = 0.145), 68.00±21.955(增加4.75%,t =−1.472;P = 0.145), 31.06±13.400(上升8.03%,t = - 4.270;P = 0.000)。结论:血液透析患者在透析环境中容易发生严重感染,原因有很多,包括未遵守适当的手部卫生、仪器污染或消毒操作不当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信