Petrophysical Analysis Using Deterministic and Probabilistic Methods in Low Resistivity Zone of Gumai and Talang Akar Formations in Jambi Subbasin South Sumatra

K. Khatimah
{"title":"Petrophysical Analysis Using Deterministic and Probabilistic Methods in Low Resistivity Zone of Gumai and Talang Akar Formations in Jambi Subbasin South Sumatra","authors":"K. Khatimah","doi":"10.29118/ipa22-sg-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South Sumatra Basin is the most productive hydrocarbons producer within the back-arc basin on the east coast of Sumatra. To maintain a balanced supply and demand, hydrocarbon findings are optimized in zones previously not considered prospective, known as low resistivity reservoirs. Zones of interest to be studied are chosen based on their hydrocarbon shows in mud logs but with wireline log resistivity of less than 5 Ωm. The research will analyze core data from petrography, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to find the causes of low resistivity. In addition, the applications of deterministic and probabilistic methods are compared to identify petrophysical parameters, namely shale volume (Vsh) by the Stieber method, porosity using neutron-density method, and water saturation determined by the Indonesian method. Results from this research are also matched with routine core analysis, mud log, and drill stem test data, indicating that the low resistivity in prospective zones is due to the presence of clay minerals composed of kaolinite, illite, and chlorite. Formation evaluation from well data estimates for shale volume of 7.85 – 37.8%, porosity of 18.22 – 23.08%, and medium water saturation of 38.68 – 52.78%. In conclusion, by combining core analysis and petrophysical evaluation, this interval was improved as potential reservoir zones and pay zone. The probabilistic method is considered more effective compared to the deterministic method, because it can construct multi-mineral and multi-fluid from several lithologies and carry out two stages of validation, from core and statistics.","PeriodicalId":442360,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Indonesian Petroleum Association, 46th Annual Convention & Exhibition, 2022","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Indonesian Petroleum Association, 46th Annual Convention & Exhibition, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29118/ipa22-sg-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The South Sumatra Basin is the most productive hydrocarbons producer within the back-arc basin on the east coast of Sumatra. To maintain a balanced supply and demand, hydrocarbon findings are optimized in zones previously not considered prospective, known as low resistivity reservoirs. Zones of interest to be studied are chosen based on their hydrocarbon shows in mud logs but with wireline log resistivity of less than 5 Ωm. The research will analyze core data from petrography, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to find the causes of low resistivity. In addition, the applications of deterministic and probabilistic methods are compared to identify petrophysical parameters, namely shale volume (Vsh) by the Stieber method, porosity using neutron-density method, and water saturation determined by the Indonesian method. Results from this research are also matched with routine core analysis, mud log, and drill stem test data, indicating that the low resistivity in prospective zones is due to the presence of clay minerals composed of kaolinite, illite, and chlorite. Formation evaluation from well data estimates for shale volume of 7.85 – 37.8%, porosity of 18.22 – 23.08%, and medium water saturation of 38.68 – 52.78%. In conclusion, by combining core analysis and petrophysical evaluation, this interval was improved as potential reservoir zones and pay zone. The probabilistic method is considered more effective compared to the deterministic method, because it can construct multi-mineral and multi-fluid from several lithologies and carry out two stages of validation, from core and statistics.
南苏门答腊占碑次盆地Gumai组和Talang Akar组低电阻率带的确定性和概率岩石物理分析
南苏门答腊盆地是苏门答腊东海岸弧后盆地内油气产量最高的盆地。为了保持供需平衡,油气发现在以前被认为没有前景的区域进行了优化,即低电阻率油藏。要研究的感兴趣区域是根据其在泥浆测井中的油气显示来选择的,但电缆测井电阻率小于5 Ωm。研究将通过岩石学、x射线衍射(XRD)和扫描电镜(SEM)分析岩心数据,找出低电阻率的原因。此外,还比较了确定性方法和概率方法在确定岩石物理参数方面的应用,即采用Stieber方法确定页岩体积(Vsh),采用中子密度方法确定孔隙度,采用印度尼西亚方法确定含水饱和度。研究结果还与常规岩心分析、泥浆测井和钻杆测试数据相匹配,表明远景区低电阻率是由于高岭石、伊利石和绿泥石等粘土矿物的存在。根据井资料评价,页岩体积为7.85 ~ 37.8%,孔隙度为18.22 ~ 23.08%,中含水饱和度为38.68 ~ 52.78%。综上所述,通过岩心分析和岩石物性评价相结合,将该层段改造为潜在储层和产油层。概率方法被认为比确定性方法更有效,因为它可以从多个岩性构造多矿物和多流体,并进行岩心和统计两个阶段的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信