Decision support system using ANT colony optimization

Anil Chopra, Suruchi Sinha, Shukun Tokas, V. Panchal
{"title":"Decision support system using ANT colony optimization","authors":"Anil Chopra, Suruchi Sinha, Shukun Tokas, V. Panchal","doi":"10.1109/INDIACOM.2014.6828130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oxford defines Research as work directed towards the `Innovation' `Introduction' and `Improvement'. The three `I' integrates well when critically evaluated. Evaluation is an important process. Every work is sent to 2-3 experts based on some criteria set. The decision is subjective as per as our study through literature is concerned. Generally majority voting is followed but their overall performance index for acceptance and rejection does not match criteria set. Hence this approach lacks the affective factor related to optimal results. To address that problem we are proposing here a new scheme that will be based on criteria set and as it will give unbiased/ unprejudiced decision on the acceptance and rejection of papers. The Ant Colony Algorithm well defines the solution to this problem. We are providing a phenomenal approach in research evaluation which will help in conflict resolving in different experts opinion.","PeriodicalId":404873,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom)","volume":"421 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIACOM.2014.6828130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oxford defines Research as work directed towards the `Innovation' `Introduction' and `Improvement'. The three `I' integrates well when critically evaluated. Evaluation is an important process. Every work is sent to 2-3 experts based on some criteria set. The decision is subjective as per as our study through literature is concerned. Generally majority voting is followed but their overall performance index for acceptance and rejection does not match criteria set. Hence this approach lacks the affective factor related to optimal results. To address that problem we are proposing here a new scheme that will be based on criteria set and as it will give unbiased/ unprejudiced decision on the acceptance and rejection of papers. The Ant Colony Algorithm well defines the solution to this problem. We are providing a phenomenal approach in research evaluation which will help in conflict resolving in different experts opinion.
基于蚁群优化的决策支持系统
牛津大学将研究定义为“创新”、“引进”和“改进”的工作。这三个“I”在经过严格评估后整合得很好。评估是一个重要的过程。每项工作都是根据一些标准发送给2-3名专家。根据我们的文献研究,这个决定是主观的。一般来说,多数投票是遵循的,但他们的接受和拒绝的总体表现指标不符合设定的标准。因此,这种方法缺乏与最佳结果相关的情感因素。为了解决这一问题,我们在此提议一项新计划,该计划将根据所确定的标准,并就接受和拒绝文件作出公正/无偏见的决定。蚁群算法很好地定义了这个问题的解决方案。我们正在提供一种非凡的研究评估方法,这将有助于解决不同专家意见的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信