A. Bozkurt, Servet Demir, Ö. F. Vural
{"title":"Comparison of Different Roles that Teachers give to Technology in Pre and Post-training","authors":"A. Bozkurt, Servet Demir, Ö. F. Vural","doi":"10.15345/IOJES.2014.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article History: Received 31.03.2014 Received in revised form 04.06.2014 Accepted 14.07.2014 Available online 02.12.2014 This study examines the roles that teachers’ give to technology in mathematics lesson by teachers. Data were acquired within the scope of a professional development project supported by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). Technology integration education given within the scope of the project lasted for a month, four hours a week. In the educational program, teachers were informed about what should be taken into consideration when integrating technology into their lessons. This study used case studies and qualitative research methods. The participants consisted of 10 teachers. The participants were randomly chosen among the teachers who received the educational training given within the scope of the project and who were available for technology use in their classes. The videos were analyzed within the context of roles given to technology. According to the findings obtained from video analyses, before the educational program, teachers did not use technology in their lessons even though their classroom environment was convenient for technology usage or used replacement, which is the lowest level among technology usage roles. After the program, teachers were observed to realize technology integration beginning generally from the lowest level. In addition, after the program, as well as replacement, two teachers used technology in the transformation role and five teachers used technology in the amplification role. © 2014 IOJES. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":358961,"journal":{"name":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15345/IOJES.2014.03.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
教师在培训前与培训后对技术的不同角色比较
文章历史:收稿日期:2014年3月31日收稿日期:2014年6月4日收稿日期:2014年7月14日在线发布日期:2014年2月12日本研究考察了教师在数学课堂上给予技术的作用。数据是在土耳其科学和技术研究理事会(TUBITAK)支持的一个专业发展项目范围内获得的。项目范围内的技术整合教育持续一个月,每周4小时。在教育项目中,老师们被告知在将技术融入他们的课程时应该考虑什么。本研究采用个案研究和定性研究方法。参与者包括10名教师。参与者是从接受过项目范围内的教育培训的教师中随机选择的,这些教师可以在课堂上使用技术。这些视频是在赋予技术角色的背景下进行分析的。从视频分析的结果来看,在教育计划之前,教师在课堂环境便于技术使用或使用替代品的情况下,没有在课堂上使用技术,这是技术使用角色中最低的水平。项目结束后,我们观察到教师们普遍从最低层次开始实现技术整合。此外,在方案实施后,以及替换后,有2名教师在转换角色中使用技术,5名教师在放大角色中使用技术。©2014 iojes。版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。