Scientists' collaboration in the social sciences field: Investigating the determinants of scholarly collaboration in the Canadian context 2001–2008

I. Belgacem, M. Lamari
{"title":"Scientists' collaboration in the social sciences field: Investigating the determinants of scholarly collaboration in the Canadian context 2001–2008","authors":"I. Belgacem, M. Lamari","doi":"10.1109/ICEELI.2012.6360656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the era of knowledge-based economies, knowledge production and transfer have emerged as a crucial component of innovation and human capital development. Science activities are globalizing and research partnerships will become increasingly imperative. Hence a considerable trend in research collaboration has been noted in the literature. Over the last few years, collaboration among scientists has been on the rise [1] and the different ways in which this collaboration takes place have been the subject of many conceptual [2] and empirical studies [3]. Furthermore, the analysis of the relationship between research inputs (grants, infrastructure spending, training of researchers, etc.) and research outputs (collaboration, productivity, citation, impact, etc.) has also been the subject of several explanatory studies, mostly done in OECD countries, whether in France [4], the United States [5], Italy [6], New Zealand [7], the United Kingdom [8], Australia [14], or the European Union [9].","PeriodicalId":398065,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Education and e-Learning Innovations","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Education and e-Learning Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEELI.2012.6360656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the era of knowledge-based economies, knowledge production and transfer have emerged as a crucial component of innovation and human capital development. Science activities are globalizing and research partnerships will become increasingly imperative. Hence a considerable trend in research collaboration has been noted in the literature. Over the last few years, collaboration among scientists has been on the rise [1] and the different ways in which this collaboration takes place have been the subject of many conceptual [2] and empirical studies [3]. Furthermore, the analysis of the relationship between research inputs (grants, infrastructure spending, training of researchers, etc.) and research outputs (collaboration, productivity, citation, impact, etc.) has also been the subject of several explanatory studies, mostly done in OECD countries, whether in France [4], the United States [5], Italy [6], New Zealand [7], the United Kingdom [8], Australia [14], or the European Union [9].
社会科学领域的科学家合作:调查2001-2008年加拿大背景下学术合作的决定因素
在知识经济时代,知识生产和转移已成为创新和人力资本发展的重要组成部分。科学活动正在全球化,研究伙伴关系将变得越来越重要。因此,研究合作的一个相当大的趋势已经在文献中注意到。在过去的几年里,科学家之间的合作一直在上升[1],而这种合作发生的不同方式已经成为许多概念性[2]和实证研究[3]的主题。此外,对研究投入(资助、基础设施支出、研究人员培训等)与研究产出(合作、生产力、引用、影响等)之间关系的分析也已成为几项解释性研究的主题,这些研究大多在经合组织国家完成,包括法国[4]、美国[5]、意大利[6]、新西兰[7]、英国[8]、澳大利亚[14]或欧盟[9]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信