Single breath measurement of pulmonary blood flow in man: the causes of variability.

R H Hooper, P J Franks
{"title":"Single breath measurement of pulmonary blood flow in man: the causes of variability.","authors":"R H Hooper,&nbsp;P J Franks","doi":"10.1088/0143-0815/13/2/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theoretically, pulmonary blood flow can be measured by the uptake of a 'soluble' gas (e.g. freon-22) compared with an 'insoluble' gas (e.g. argon). As with all indirect methods, a number of uncertainties exist. Inhalation of a freon-22 and argon mixture (3.5%, 10%, 35% O2 balance N2) was made, with a subsequent, slow steady exhalation. The complete manoeuvre is termed the single breath technique (SBT). The repeatability of the SBT was assessed over four repeat measurements at rest, the mean difference between paired measurements lying in the range -0.09 to 0.04 l min-1, excluding the first trial measurements. Various features of the SBT were investigated to assess their influence on the reliability of the technique. It is shown: that the initial volume inhaled should be close to vital capacity; that a brief period of apnoea greater than 9 s following inhalation is necessary; that the subsequent exhalation should be about 10 l min-1; and that difficulties associated with recirculation of freon-22 are not encountered, presumably due to its wide distribution in body water. Under these highly controlled circumstances the technique is reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":77070,"journal":{"name":"Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics","volume":"13 2","pages":"139-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1088/0143-0815/13/2/006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815/13/2/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theoretically, pulmonary blood flow can be measured by the uptake of a 'soluble' gas (e.g. freon-22) compared with an 'insoluble' gas (e.g. argon). As with all indirect methods, a number of uncertainties exist. Inhalation of a freon-22 and argon mixture (3.5%, 10%, 35% O2 balance N2) was made, with a subsequent, slow steady exhalation. The complete manoeuvre is termed the single breath technique (SBT). The repeatability of the SBT was assessed over four repeat measurements at rest, the mean difference between paired measurements lying in the range -0.09 to 0.04 l min-1, excluding the first trial measurements. Various features of the SBT were investigated to assess their influence on the reliability of the technique. It is shown: that the initial volume inhaled should be close to vital capacity; that a brief period of apnoea greater than 9 s following inhalation is necessary; that the subsequent exhalation should be about 10 l min-1; and that difficulties associated with recirculation of freon-22 are not encountered, presumably due to its wide distribution in body water. Under these highly controlled circumstances the technique is reliable.

人单次呼吸测量肺血流量:变异的原因。
理论上,肺血流量可以通过“可溶”气体(如氟利昂-22)与“不可溶”气体(如氩气)的摄取来测量。与所有间接方法一样,存在许多不确定因素。吸入氟利昂-22和氩气混合物(3.5%,10%,35% O2平衡N2),随后缓慢稳定地呼出。整个动作称为单呼吸技术(SBT)。SBT的可重复性在休息时通过四次重复测量进行评估,配对测量之间的平均差异在-0.09至0.04 l min-1范围内,不包括第一次试验测量。研究了SBT的各种特征,以评估它们对技术可靠性的影响。结果表明:初始吸入体积应接近肺活量;吸入后需要短暂的呼吸暂停,时间大于9秒;随后的呼气时间约为10l min-1;而且,与氟利昂-22再循环有关的困难没有遇到,大概是因为它在水体中的广泛分布。在这种高度受控的情况下,这项技术是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信