The Efficacy and Safety of Intrauterine Misoprostol During Cesarean Section in Prevention of Primary Post-Partum Hemorrhage - A Randomized Controlled Trial
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Intrauterine Misoprostol During Cesarean Section in Prevention of Primary Post-Partum Hemorrhage - A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"","doi":"10.51626/ijog.2022.02.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postpartum hemorrhage remains the most common cause of maternal death globally [1]. and has persisted in low-income countries due to the prevalence of home deliveries and limited access to life-saving uterotonic drugs in these countries [2-5]. Many of the global gains in reducing maternal mortality can be attributed to developments in preventing and treating Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) [6,7]. PPH is often associated\nwith the failure of the uterus to contract after delivery and is categorized as blood loss of 500 mL or more following a vaginal delivery or 1,000 mL after cesarean delivery [8,9]. PPH is categorized as primary if it occurs within 24 hours of delivery and secondary if excessive blood loss occurs at 24 hours or more after delivery. To compare the efficacy and safety of intrauterine misoprostol with intravenous oxytocin during Cesarean Section (CS) in prevention of primary post-partum hemorrhage. A total of 150 pregnant women at term (37-40 weeks) gestation who were scheduled for either elective or emergency caesarean delivery were enrolled. They were equally randomized into two groups: women who received 400mcg intrauterine misoprostol in addition to intravenous infusion of 10 IU oxytocin as Group I while women who received an intravenous infusion of 10 IU oxytocin after delivery of the neonate as Group II. The Primary outcome measures were Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) during caesarean section and need for additional uterotonic drugs intraoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of excessive blood loss (>1000mL) within the first 6 hours postoperatively and the occurrence of any maternal or fetal side effects. The difference in the postoperative haemoglobin and postoperative hematocrit was found to be highly significant between the two groups (10.12 ± 1.55 vs 9.24 ± 1.52; p < 0.01) and\n(2.48 ± 1.38 vs 3.75 ± 1.77; p < 0.001) respectively. Estimated blood loss in two groups was found to be very highly significant (440.19 ± 257.75 vs 677.38 ± 343.04; p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the group I compared to group II (408.27 ± 123.34 vs 486.04 ± 135.84; p < 0.001). Blood loss during the first 6 hours after delivery was also lower in the group I (58.87 ± 9.86 mL vs 63.29 ± 12.39 mL; p <\n0.05). Fewer women in the intrauterine misoprostol group needed additional uterotonics (7 vs 11; p > 0.05). The difference in the side effects of both the groups was found to be statistically non-significant. Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were comparable in both the groups. The combined use of intrauterine misoprostol (400 mg), when added to oxytocin infusion during caesarean section is effective in decreasing the intraoperative\nblood loss, post-operative blood loss and prevent postpartum hemorrhage.\nkeywords: Intrauterine misoprostol; Intraoperative estimated blood loss; Cesarean section; Postpartum hemorrhage","PeriodicalId":393221,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51626/ijog.2022.02.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Postpartum hemorrhage remains the most common cause of maternal death globally [1]. and has persisted in low-income countries due to the prevalence of home deliveries and limited access to life-saving uterotonic drugs in these countries [2-5]. Many of the global gains in reducing maternal mortality can be attributed to developments in preventing and treating Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) [6,7]. PPH is often associated
with the failure of the uterus to contract after delivery and is categorized as blood loss of 500 mL or more following a vaginal delivery or 1,000 mL after cesarean delivery [8,9]. PPH is categorized as primary if it occurs within 24 hours of delivery and secondary if excessive blood loss occurs at 24 hours or more after delivery. To compare the efficacy and safety of intrauterine misoprostol with intravenous oxytocin during Cesarean Section (CS) in prevention of primary post-partum hemorrhage. A total of 150 pregnant women at term (37-40 weeks) gestation who were scheduled for either elective or emergency caesarean delivery were enrolled. They were equally randomized into two groups: women who received 400mcg intrauterine misoprostol in addition to intravenous infusion of 10 IU oxytocin as Group I while women who received an intravenous infusion of 10 IU oxytocin after delivery of the neonate as Group II. The Primary outcome measures were Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) during caesarean section and need for additional uterotonic drugs intraoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of excessive blood loss (>1000mL) within the first 6 hours postoperatively and the occurrence of any maternal or fetal side effects. The difference in the postoperative haemoglobin and postoperative hematocrit was found to be highly significant between the two groups (10.12 ± 1.55 vs 9.24 ± 1.52; p < 0.01) and
(2.48 ± 1.38 vs 3.75 ± 1.77; p < 0.001) respectively. Estimated blood loss in two groups was found to be very highly significant (440.19 ± 257.75 vs 677.38 ± 343.04; p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the group I compared to group II (408.27 ± 123.34 vs 486.04 ± 135.84; p < 0.001). Blood loss during the first 6 hours after delivery was also lower in the group I (58.87 ± 9.86 mL vs 63.29 ± 12.39 mL; p <
0.05). Fewer women in the intrauterine misoprostol group needed additional uterotonics (7 vs 11; p > 0.05). The difference in the side effects of both the groups was found to be statistically non-significant. Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were comparable in both the groups. The combined use of intrauterine misoprostol (400 mg), when added to oxytocin infusion during caesarean section is effective in decreasing the intraoperative
blood loss, post-operative blood loss and prevent postpartum hemorrhage.
keywords: Intrauterine misoprostol; Intraoperative estimated blood loss; Cesarean section; Postpartum hemorrhage
产后出血仍然是全球孕产妇死亡的最常见原因[1]。并且在低收入国家持续存在,因为这些国家普遍在家分娩,并且获得挽救生命的子宫扩张药物的机会有限[2-5]。全球在降低孕产妇死亡率方面取得的许多成果可归因于预防和治疗产后出血(PPH)方面的进展[6,7]。PPH通常与分娩后子宫无法收缩有关,可归类为阴道分娩后失血500 mL及以上或剖宫产后失血1000 mL[8,9]。如果发生在分娩24小时内,PPH被归类为原发性,如果在分娩后24小时或更长时间内出现大量失血,PPH被归类为继发性。目的比较剖宫产术中宫内米索前列醇与静脉催产素预防原发性产后出血的疗效和安全性。共有150名妊娠期(37-40周)的孕妇被纳入研究,她们计划进行选择性或紧急剖腹产。她们被随机分为两组:第一组接受400mcg宫内米索前列醇并静脉输注10iu催产素,第二组在新生儿出生后静脉输注10iu催产素。主要观察指标为剖宫产术中估计失血量(EBL)和术中是否需要额外的子宫扩张药物。次要结局包括术后前6小时内出现失血过多(>1000mL)及发生任何母体或胎儿副作用。两组患者术后血红蛋白和红细胞压积差异显著(10.12±1.55 vs 9.24±1.52;P < 0.01)和(2.48±1.38 vs 3.75±1.77;P < 0.001)。两组的估计失血量非常显著(440.19±257.75 vs 677.38±343.04;P < 0.001)。I组术中出血量明显低于II组(408.27±123.34 vs 486.04±135.84;P < 0.001)。产后前6小时出血量I组也较低(58.87±9.86 mL vs 63.29±12.39 mL;p 0.05)。两组的副作用差异在统计学上无显著性。两组在1分钟和5分钟时的Apgar评分具有可比性。剖宫产术中加用宫内米索前列醇(400 mg)配合催产素输注,可有效减少术中失血量和术后失血量,预防产后出血。关键词:宫内米索前列醇;术中估计失血量;剖腹产;产后出血