REGULATION AND DEREGULATION: STRIKING A BALANCE BETWEEN CONTROL AND ENTREPRENEURIAL FREEDOM

Надія Шмиголь, Андрій Антонюк, Є. Шмиголь, В.В. Кузьмін
{"title":"REGULATION AND DEREGULATION: STRIKING A BALANCE BETWEEN CONTROL AND ENTREPRENEURIAL FREEDOM","authors":"Надія Шмиголь, Андрій Антонюк, Є. Шмиголь, В.В. Кузьмін","doi":"10.32782/cmi/2023-6-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the state and issues of deregulation, identifies directions for the formation of an organizational and economic mechanism to ensure effective regulatory policy in the agricultural sector of Ukraine. It is based on the principles and strategic directions of regulatory policy in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development, the organizational and legal aspects of making regulatory decisions by legislative and executive authorities in Ukraine, as well as coordination mechanisms involving the State Regulatory Service. The state is responsible for exercising regulatory functions to manage development. On the other hand, excessive control and excessive intervention in all spheres of activity, instead of managed development, lead to a decrease in the efficiency of the entire system's functioning. The experience of Ukraine proves this: according to international comparisons, the country has the highest level of regulation with the lowest GDP per capita in Europe. It is argued that the strategy should include a complex of practical measures of organizational and economic nature, as well as regulatory measures that apply to the entire economy of Ukraine as a whole and to individual enterprises within the agricultural sector, within defined principles. Among the general organizational and economic measures, the implementation of the \"regulatory guillotine\" method for swift review and maximum abolition of existing administrative constraints is identified. The alignment of subsequent regulatory acts with EU requirements, along with the creation of a corresponding registry accessible to the public, is also considered. It is emphasized that this process should be fully in line with the existing algorithm for the adoption and tracking of regulatory acts, involving all interested parties. Moreover, it is important to work within the existing coordination mechanism to prevent the creation of additional organizational structures in the form of special commissions, services, or committees to avoid manual control.","PeriodicalId":294563,"journal":{"name":"Управління змінами та інновації","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Управління змінами та інновації","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32782/cmi/2023-6-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the state and issues of deregulation, identifies directions for the formation of an organizational and economic mechanism to ensure effective regulatory policy in the agricultural sector of Ukraine. It is based on the principles and strategic directions of regulatory policy in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development, the organizational and legal aspects of making regulatory decisions by legislative and executive authorities in Ukraine, as well as coordination mechanisms involving the State Regulatory Service. The state is responsible for exercising regulatory functions to manage development. On the other hand, excessive control and excessive intervention in all spheres of activity, instead of managed development, lead to a decrease in the efficiency of the entire system's functioning. The experience of Ukraine proves this: according to international comparisons, the country has the highest level of regulation with the lowest GDP per capita in Europe. It is argued that the strategy should include a complex of practical measures of organizational and economic nature, as well as regulatory measures that apply to the entire economy of Ukraine as a whole and to individual enterprises within the agricultural sector, within defined principles. Among the general organizational and economic measures, the implementation of the "regulatory guillotine" method for swift review and maximum abolition of existing administrative constraints is identified. The alignment of subsequent regulatory acts with EU requirements, along with the creation of a corresponding registry accessible to the public, is also considered. It is emphasized that this process should be fully in line with the existing algorithm for the adoption and tracking of regulatory acts, involving all interested parties. Moreover, it is important to work within the existing coordination mechanism to prevent the creation of additional organizational structures in the form of special commissions, services, or committees to avoid manual control.
监管与放松管制:在控制与企业自由之间取得平衡
本文考察了解除管制的状态和问题,确定了形成组织和经济机制的方向,以确保乌克兰农业部门有效的监管政策。它基于乌克兰在可持续发展背景下监管政策的原则和战略方向,乌克兰立法和行政当局制定监管决定的组织和法律方面,以及涉及国家监管局的协调机制。国家负责履行管理发展的调节职能。另一方面,对所有活动领域的过度控制和过度干预,而不是有管理的发展,导致整个系统运作效率的下降。乌克兰的经验证明了这一点:根据国际比较,该国的监管水平最高,人均GDP在欧洲最低。有人认为,该战略应包括一系列具有组织和经济性质的实际措施,以及适用于整个乌克兰经济和农业部门内的个别企业的规定原则的管制措施。在一般的组织和经济措施中,确定了执行“管制断头台”方法,以便迅速审查和最大限度地取消现有的行政限制。还考虑了后续监管法案与欧盟要求的一致性,以及创建对公众开放的相应注册表。有人强调,这一进程应完全符合现有的通过和跟踪管制行为的算法,并使所有有关方面都参与其中。此外,重要的是要在现有的协调机制内开展工作,防止以特别委员会、事务处或委员会的形式建立额外的组织结构,以避免人工控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信