Impulsivity and Childhood Physical Abuse Predict Past 30-day Cannabis Use Among Bisexual Women

Margo A. Drohan, C. Schulz, Emily M Glatt, A. Stamates, M. Kelley
{"title":"Impulsivity and Childhood Physical Abuse Predict Past 30-day Cannabis Use Among Bisexual Women","authors":"Margo A. Drohan, C. Schulz, Emily M Glatt, A. Stamates, M. Kelley","doi":"10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research suggests that bisexual women’s rate of cannabis use is 2 to 7 times higher than their heterosexual peers; however, factors contributing to this are unclear. Trait impulsivity (i.e., tendency to act without forethought) and history of childhood physical abuse (CPA) are two risk factors that may be relevant for bisexual women’s cannabis use. Specifically, bisexual women indicate high levels of risk-taking and commonly report histories of CPA. While both impulsivity and CPA have been identified as predictors of cannabis use in heterosexual women, research has yet to explore these factors as predictors of cannabis use among bisexual women. Consequently, the present study examined CPA and trait impulsivity as predictors of cannabis use in a sample of bisexual women. It was hypothesized that both trait impulsivity and exposure to CPA would predict greater frequency of cannabis use. Participants were 225 bisexual women aged 22.77 years (SD = 3.45) recruited from a southeastern university and community area. Participants completed an online survey including questions about their past 30-day frequency of cannabis use (5-point scale ranging from 0 = never to 4 = daily), CPA using the Child Maltreatment Scale-physical abuse subscale, and impulsivity using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-version 11. A majority of the sample reported cannabis use in the past 30 days (60.3%), with 23.2% using once or twice, 12.9% using weekly, 11.2% using almost daily, and 12.9% using daily. To account for the large number of zero values on the cannabis use score, we tested a Poisson hurdle model to evaluate the effects of CPA and impulsivity on cannabis use. Frequency of cannabis use was modeled first as a binary logistic model (0 versus any use) and then as a truncated regression model for non-zero responses. Results indicated that across all participants, greater impulsivity predicted any cannabis use in the past 30 days (p = .003), but CPA did not (p = .942). Among participants who reported past 30-day cannabis use only, CPA was associated with increased frequency of cannabis use (p = .003), and impulsivity did not predict frequency of cannabis use (p = .683). Overall, results indicated that greater trait impulsivity was associated with past 30-day cannabis use, but not frequency of cannabis use. Conversely, greater CPA exposure was not associated with whether one used cannabis in the past 30 days but instead was related to increased frequency of past 30-day cannabis use. Thus, although trait impulsivity may identify cannabis users, CPA may identify sexual minority women who are at risk for increased frequency of cannabis use. Given the potential long-term harms associated with increased cannabis use (e.g., changes in brain morphology, cognitive impairment, and respiratory issues), prevention efforts targeting bisexual women may want to consider impulsivity and CPA.","PeriodicalId":383892,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research suggests that bisexual women’s rate of cannabis use is 2 to 7 times higher than their heterosexual peers; however, factors contributing to this are unclear. Trait impulsivity (i.e., tendency to act without forethought) and history of childhood physical abuse (CPA) are two risk factors that may be relevant for bisexual women’s cannabis use. Specifically, bisexual women indicate high levels of risk-taking and commonly report histories of CPA. While both impulsivity and CPA have been identified as predictors of cannabis use in heterosexual women, research has yet to explore these factors as predictors of cannabis use among bisexual women. Consequently, the present study examined CPA and trait impulsivity as predictors of cannabis use in a sample of bisexual women. It was hypothesized that both trait impulsivity and exposure to CPA would predict greater frequency of cannabis use. Participants were 225 bisexual women aged 22.77 years (SD = 3.45) recruited from a southeastern university and community area. Participants completed an online survey including questions about their past 30-day frequency of cannabis use (5-point scale ranging from 0 = never to 4 = daily), CPA using the Child Maltreatment Scale-physical abuse subscale, and impulsivity using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-version 11. A majority of the sample reported cannabis use in the past 30 days (60.3%), with 23.2% using once or twice, 12.9% using weekly, 11.2% using almost daily, and 12.9% using daily. To account for the large number of zero values on the cannabis use score, we tested a Poisson hurdle model to evaluate the effects of CPA and impulsivity on cannabis use. Frequency of cannabis use was modeled first as a binary logistic model (0 versus any use) and then as a truncated regression model for non-zero responses. Results indicated that across all participants, greater impulsivity predicted any cannabis use in the past 30 days (p = .003), but CPA did not (p = .942). Among participants who reported past 30-day cannabis use only, CPA was associated with increased frequency of cannabis use (p = .003), and impulsivity did not predict frequency of cannabis use (p = .683). Overall, results indicated that greater trait impulsivity was associated with past 30-day cannabis use, but not frequency of cannabis use. Conversely, greater CPA exposure was not associated with whether one used cannabis in the past 30 days but instead was related to increased frequency of past 30-day cannabis use. Thus, although trait impulsivity may identify cannabis users, CPA may identify sexual minority women who are at risk for increased frequency of cannabis use. Given the potential long-term harms associated with increased cannabis use (e.g., changes in brain morphology, cognitive impairment, and respiratory issues), prevention efforts targeting bisexual women may want to consider impulsivity and CPA.
冲动和童年身体虐待预测双性恋女性过去30天的大麻使用情况
先前的研究表明,双性恋女性吸食大麻的比例是异性恋女性的2到7倍;然而,造成这种情况的因素尚不清楚。特质性冲动(即,没有事先考虑就采取行动的倾向)和童年身体虐待史(CPA)是可能与双性恋女性大麻使用相关的两个风险因素。具体来说,双性恋女性表现出较高的冒险水平,并且通常报告有CPA病史。虽然冲动性和CPA都已被确定为异性恋女性使用大麻的预测因素,但研究尚未探索这些因素作为双性恋女性使用大麻的预测因素。因此,本研究在双性恋女性样本中检验了CPA和特质冲动作为大麻使用的预测因素。据推测,性格冲动和接触CPA都能预测更频繁地使用大麻。参与者为225名双性恋女性,年龄22.77岁(SD = 3.45),来自东南大学和社区。参与者完成了一项在线调查,包括他们过去30天使用大麻的频率(5分制,从0 =从不到4 =每天),CPA使用儿童虐待量表-身体虐待子量表,以及冲动性使用Barratt冲动性量表-第11版。大多数样本报告在过去30天内使用大麻(60.3%),其中23.2%使用一次或两次,12.9%每周使用一次,11.2%几乎每天使用一次,12.9%每天使用。为了解释大麻使用得分上大量的零值,我们测试了泊松障碍模型来评估CPA和冲动性对大麻使用的影响。大麻使用频率首先建模为二元逻辑模型(0对任何使用),然后作为非零响应的截断回归模型。结果表明,在所有参与者中,更大的冲动性预示着过去30天内的任何大麻使用(p = 0.003),但CPA没有(p = 0.942)。在仅报告过去30天大麻使用的参与者中,CPA与大麻使用频率增加有关(p = 0.003),冲动与大麻使用频率无关(p = 0.683)。总体而言,结果表明,更大的特质冲动与过去30天的大麻使用有关,但与大麻使用频率无关。相反,更多的CPA暴露与过去30天内是否使用大麻无关,而是与过去30天内使用大麻的频率增加有关。因此,虽然冲动性特征可以识别大麻使用者,但CPA可以识别有增加大麻使用频率风险的性少数妇女。考虑到大麻使用增加带来的潜在长期危害(例如,大脑形态的改变、认知障碍和呼吸问题),针对双性恋女性的预防工作可能需要考虑冲动和CPA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信