A Study on the Road Conditions Assessment Obtained from International Roughness Index (IRI): Roughometer Vs Hawkeye

S. Samsuri, M. Surbakti, A. Tarigan, R. Anas
{"title":"A Study on the Road Conditions Assessment Obtained from International Roughness Index (IRI): Roughometer Vs Hawkeye","authors":"S. Samsuri, M. Surbakti, A. Tarigan, R. Anas","doi":"10.32734/jet.v1i2.756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study is aimed to find out what is the representation of IRI (International Roughness Index) from the Roughometer results if it was used as substitute of IRI from the Hawkeye results on the road conditions assessment, which is the hawkeye device is included in the Class I category of roughness measurement devices, while the Roughometer is in the Class III. The Student’s t statistical operation is used to find the representation of IRI from the Roughometer results as substitute of IRI from the Hawkeye results. It is determined by analyzing the comparison of the mean values of both measurement results. The study was conducted on three national road sections in North Sumatra Province, namely: Bts. Kota Binjai – Bts. Kota Medan road with a length of 7,300 meters, Bts. Kota Tebing Tinggi – Bts. Kabupaten Simalungun road with a length of 18,800 meters, and Bts. Kabupaten Simalungun/Bts. Kabupaten Sergai road with a length of 15,000 meters. The IRI values were measured by using Roughometer and Hawkeye devices. The measurements were carried out with the survey team from the Center for Implementation of the National Road II Medan, which was also the facilitators in providing the survey equipment, Roughometer and Hawkeye. The statistical test results that the IRI values from the Roughometer measurement results were significantly different from the IRI values from the Hawkeye measurement results (Ho was rejected) because the Student’s t-test results for the three road sections showed that tcount > tcritical and p-value < 0.05. And the assessment of the road functional conditions using Roughometer showed the same results on one road section but worse results on the other two road sections compared to assessment of the functional conditions with Hawkeye. Based on the analysis results, it can be concluded that the IRI values from Roughometer were more conservative in representing the functional conditions of the road when used as a substitute for the IRI values from Hawkeye.","PeriodicalId":117730,"journal":{"name":"Simetrikal: Journal of Engineering and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simetrikal: Journal of Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32734/jet.v1i2.756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Study is aimed to find out what is the representation of IRI (International Roughness Index) from the Roughometer results if it was used as substitute of IRI from the Hawkeye results on the road conditions assessment, which is the hawkeye device is included in the Class I category of roughness measurement devices, while the Roughometer is in the Class III. The Student’s t statistical operation is used to find the representation of IRI from the Roughometer results as substitute of IRI from the Hawkeye results. It is determined by analyzing the comparison of the mean values of both measurement results. The study was conducted on three national road sections in North Sumatra Province, namely: Bts. Kota Binjai – Bts. Kota Medan road with a length of 7,300 meters, Bts. Kota Tebing Tinggi – Bts. Kabupaten Simalungun road with a length of 18,800 meters, and Bts. Kabupaten Simalungun/Bts. Kabupaten Sergai road with a length of 15,000 meters. The IRI values were measured by using Roughometer and Hawkeye devices. The measurements were carried out with the survey team from the Center for Implementation of the National Road II Medan, which was also the facilitators in providing the survey equipment, Roughometer and Hawkeye. The statistical test results that the IRI values from the Roughometer measurement results were significantly different from the IRI values from the Hawkeye measurement results (Ho was rejected) because the Student’s t-test results for the three road sections showed that tcount > tcritical and p-value < 0.05. And the assessment of the road functional conditions using Roughometer showed the same results on one road section but worse results on the other two road sections compared to assessment of the functional conditions with Hawkeye. Based on the analysis results, it can be concluded that the IRI values from Roughometer were more conservative in representing the functional conditions of the road when used as a substitute for the IRI values from Hawkeye.
基于国际粗糙度指数(IRI)的道路状况评价研究:Roughometer Vs Hawkeye
研究的目的是找出如果用Roughometer的结果代替Hawkeye的结果进行路况评估,IRI (International Roughness Index)的表示是什么,即Hawkeye设备属于第一类粗糙度测量设备,而Roughometer属于第三类粗糙度测量设备。Student的t统计运算用于从Roughometer结果中找到IRI的表示,以替代Hawkeye结果中的IRI。这是通过分析两种测量结果的平均值的比较来确定的。该研究是在北苏门答腊省的三个国道路段进行的,即:Bts。Kota Binjai - Bts。哥打棉兰公路全长7300米,Bts。哥打德炳庭吉- Bts。长1.88万米的Kabupaten寺马龙岗公路和Bts。县Simalungun Bts /。长15000米的Kabupaten Sergai公路。使用Roughometer和Hawkeye装置测量IRI值。测量是与棉兰国道二号实施中心的测量小组一起进行的,该中心也是提供测量设备,Roughometer和Hawkeye的促进者。统计检验结果表明,Roughometer测量结果的IRI值与Hawkeye测量结果的IRI值有显著差异(Ho被拒绝),因为三个路段的Student 's t检验结果显示tcount >是临界的,p值< 0.05。使用Roughometer对道路功能状况的评估结果与使用Hawkeye对道路功能状况的评估结果相同,但在其他两个路段的评估结果较差。从分析结果可以看出,当使用Roughometer的IRI值代替Hawkeye的IRI值时,可以更保守地代表道路的功能状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信