A pilot study: consumer acceptability of Polish style cooked sausages containing house cricket flour

Liisa Keto, T. Stefański, Antti Isokangas, P. Rautio, S. Rokka, A. Pihlanto
{"title":"A pilot study: consumer acceptability of Polish style cooked sausages containing house cricket flour","authors":"Liisa Keto, T. Stefański, Antti Isokangas, P. Rautio, S. Rokka, A. Pihlanto","doi":"10.33354/smst.73139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing interest on insects as food in Western countries. Currently, EU legislation limits the use of insects as food, however, new regulation coming to force in 2018 will clarify the situation. In the ScenoProt project funded by Strategic Research Council of Finnish Academy insects are considered as potential protein source for human consumption, and therefore, some food technological properties of insects are studied in the project. Scientific research has proven mealworm larvae and silkworm pupae originated protein fraction equal to meat protein in emulsion sausages. Generally, it is also of interest how unfractionated, chitin containing insect flour would affect the sensory properties of sausages. The objective of the present study was to investigate the consumer attitudes to Polish style sausages containing unfractionated house cricket (Acheta domesticus) flour. Lean and fatty meat was purchased from local supplier, and three different sets of smoked and cooked sausages were made. The basic recipe contained pork, water, house cricket flour, nitrite salt, and spices. Salt content of sausages was approx. 1.8%. In the first set 1/5, and in the second and third set approx. 1/6 of lean meat was replaced with house cricket flour. The fat content was approx. 12% in the first and 19–20% in the second and third set of sausages. The third set included ordinary Polish style sausage as a reference. Cooking loss of the sausages was acceptable, below 10%. Odor, texture and taste were evaluated by ordinary consumers (n=26) for the first, by media people (n=34) for the second, and by representatives of food industry (n=17) for the third set. Because of potential allergic reaction in shellfish sensitive people, the consumers were informed about the contents of the sausages. Consumer willingness to eat sausages again was recorded for the first and second set and free comments were collected for all the sets. The evaluation scale had five points (1=extremely negative, 5=extremely positive).Only in the first set the evaluations on odor, texture, and taste of the sausages averaged lower than 3. Even the willingness to eat sausages again was approx. 3. This may reflect the interest of the consumers towards food containing insects in general. The increased fat content in the second and third sets of sausages may be one factor responsible for increase in the valuation of the sensory parameters as Finnish consumers are used to the fat content of around 20 % in cooked sausages. In the third set the control sausages showed slightly higher acceptance for texture than the house cricket sausages. In free comments, dryness, dark colour, floury texture, and liver flavor were most often mentioned. In conclusion, consumers may accept non-fractionated house cricket flour as a sausage ingredient but its strong flavor may limit the level of inclusion or lead towards stronger, masking, spicing in the house cricket sausages.","PeriodicalId":127337,"journal":{"name":"Suomen Maataloustieteellisen Seuran Tiedote","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suomen Maataloustieteellisen Seuran Tiedote","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33354/smst.73139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There is a growing interest on insects as food in Western countries. Currently, EU legislation limits the use of insects as food, however, new regulation coming to force in 2018 will clarify the situation. In the ScenoProt project funded by Strategic Research Council of Finnish Academy insects are considered as potential protein source for human consumption, and therefore, some food technological properties of insects are studied in the project. Scientific research has proven mealworm larvae and silkworm pupae originated protein fraction equal to meat protein in emulsion sausages. Generally, it is also of interest how unfractionated, chitin containing insect flour would affect the sensory properties of sausages. The objective of the present study was to investigate the consumer attitudes to Polish style sausages containing unfractionated house cricket (Acheta domesticus) flour. Lean and fatty meat was purchased from local supplier, and three different sets of smoked and cooked sausages were made. The basic recipe contained pork, water, house cricket flour, nitrite salt, and spices. Salt content of sausages was approx. 1.8%. In the first set 1/5, and in the second and third set approx. 1/6 of lean meat was replaced with house cricket flour. The fat content was approx. 12% in the first and 19–20% in the second and third set of sausages. The third set included ordinary Polish style sausage as a reference. Cooking loss of the sausages was acceptable, below 10%. Odor, texture and taste were evaluated by ordinary consumers (n=26) for the first, by media people (n=34) for the second, and by representatives of food industry (n=17) for the third set. Because of potential allergic reaction in shellfish sensitive people, the consumers were informed about the contents of the sausages. Consumer willingness to eat sausages again was recorded for the first and second set and free comments were collected for all the sets. The evaluation scale had five points (1=extremely negative, 5=extremely positive).Only in the first set the evaluations on odor, texture, and taste of the sausages averaged lower than 3. Even the willingness to eat sausages again was approx. 3. This may reflect the interest of the consumers towards food containing insects in general. The increased fat content in the second and third sets of sausages may be one factor responsible for increase in the valuation of the sensory parameters as Finnish consumers are used to the fat content of around 20 % in cooked sausages. In the third set the control sausages showed slightly higher acceptance for texture than the house cricket sausages. In free comments, dryness, dark colour, floury texture, and liver flavor were most often mentioned. In conclusion, consumers may accept non-fractionated house cricket flour as a sausage ingredient but its strong flavor may limit the level of inclusion or lead towards stronger, masking, spicing in the house cricket sausages.
一项试点研究:消费者对含有蟋蟀粉的波兰式煮熟香肠的接受程度
在西方国家,人们对昆虫作为食物的兴趣日益浓厚。目前,欧盟立法限制昆虫作为食物的使用,然而,将于2018年生效的新法规将澄清这一情况。在芬兰科学院战略研究委员会资助的ScenoProt项目中,昆虫被认为是人类食用的潜在蛋白质来源,因此,该项目研究了昆虫的一些食品技术特性。科学研究证实,乳状香肠中粉虫幼虫和蚕蛹的蛋白质含量与肉蛋白相当。一般来说,含几丁质的昆虫粉如何影响香肠的感官特性也是一个有趣的问题。本研究的目的是调查消费者对波兰风格香肠含有未分离的家蟋蟀(Acheta domesticus)面粉的态度。瘦肉和肥肉是从当地供应商那里购买的,并制作了三套不同的烟熏和熟香肠。基本配方包括猪肉、水、蟋蟀粉、亚硝酸盐和香料。香肠的含盐量约为。1.8%。第一组为1/5,第二组和第三组约为。1/6的瘦肉用蟋蟀粉代替。脂肪含量约为。第一组为12%,第二组和第三组为19-20%。第三套包括普通波兰香肠作为参考。香肠的蒸煮损失是可以接受的,低于10%。第一组由普通消费者(n=26)评价,第二组由媒体人(n=34)评价,第三组由食品行业代表(n=17)评价。由于对贝类敏感的人可能会有过敏反应,消费者被告知香肠的内容。记录了第一组和第二组的消费者再次食用香肠的意愿,并收集了所有组的免费评论。评价量表分为5分(1=极负,5=极正)。只有在第一组中,香肠的气味、质地和味道的平均评分低于3分。就连再次吃香肠的意愿也差不多。3.这可能反映了消费者对含有昆虫的食物的普遍兴趣。第二组和第三组香肠中脂肪含量的增加可能是导致感官参数估值增加的一个因素,因为芬兰消费者习惯了熟香肠中脂肪含量约为20%。在第三组中,对照香肠对口感的接受度略高于家养蟋蟀香肠。在自由评论中,干燥、颜色深、面粉质地和肝味是最常被提到的。综上所述,消费者可能会接受未分级的蟋蟀粉作为香肠的配料,但其强烈的味道可能会限制其含量,或者导致蟋蟀香肠中的香料更浓烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信