AHP enlargement in traditional Entropy-TOPSIS approach for selecting desktop personal computers for distance learning: Decomposition of evaluation criteria in blocks with AHP for better consideration of users’ needs in the MCDM process on the example of the Entropy-TOPSIS approach

I. Petrov
{"title":"AHP enlargement in traditional Entropy-TOPSIS approach for selecting desktop personal computers for distance learning: Decomposition of evaluation criteria in blocks with AHP for better consideration of users’ needs in the MCDM process on the example of the Entropy-TOPSIS approach","authors":"I. Petrov","doi":"10.1145/3472410.3472431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distance learning became more popular in recent years and its effectiveness depends on the reliability of complex information systems. Under conditions of COVID-19 and the economic crisis, a larger number of users have to implement new working point(s) requiring unplanned investment efforts. Schools, universities, and households are interested in products and components that are adequate to the specifics of the education and can be purchased, maintained, and operated at minimum costs. In this context, the selections of personal computers (PCs) have to take into account various technical parameters and economic factors. Although Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) uses different approaches for supporting decision-makers (DM), there are still many areas for possible improvements. One of them, the enlargement of the traditional “Entropy-TOPSIS” approach with the AHP method provides a more structured, transparent, and objective definition of weights for evaluation criteria in many areas.","PeriodicalId":115575,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3472410.3472431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Distance learning became more popular in recent years and its effectiveness depends on the reliability of complex information systems. Under conditions of COVID-19 and the economic crisis, a larger number of users have to implement new working point(s) requiring unplanned investment efforts. Schools, universities, and households are interested in products and components that are adequate to the specifics of the education and can be purchased, maintained, and operated at minimum costs. In this context, the selections of personal computers (PCs) have to take into account various technical parameters and economic factors. Although Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) uses different approaches for supporting decision-makers (DM), there are still many areas for possible improvements. One of them, the enlargement of the traditional “Entropy-TOPSIS” approach with the AHP method provides a more structured, transparent, and objective definition of weights for evaluation criteria in many areas.
选择远程学习台式个人计算机的传统熵- topsis方法中的AHP扩展:以熵- topsis方法为例,用AHP将评价标准分解为块,以更好地考虑MCDM过程中用户的需求
远程教育近年来越来越流行,其有效性取决于复杂信息系统的可靠性。在新冠肺炎疫情和经济危机的情况下,越来越多的用户不得不实施新的工作点,需要进行计划外的投资。学校、大学和家庭对适合教育的产品和组件感兴趣,并且可以以最低的成本购买、维护和操作。在这种情况下,个人电脑(pc)的选择必须考虑到各种技术参数和经济因素。尽管多标准决策分析(MCDA)使用不同的方法来支持决策者(DM),但仍有许多可能改进的领域。其中之一,用AHP方法对传统的“熵- topsis”方法进行扩展,为许多领域的评价标准提供了更结构化、更透明、更客观的权重定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信