Argumentative Speak Ability in Oral Assessment for Students In Indonesian Language Education Study Profgram at Muhammadiyah University of Purwokerto 2010

E. Suroso, Sumarlam, M. Rohmadi, Sumawati
{"title":"Argumentative Speak Ability in Oral Assessment for Students In Indonesian Language Education Study Profgram at Muhammadiyah University of Purwokerto 2010","authors":"E. Suroso, Sumarlam, M. Rohmadi, Sumawati","doi":"10.2991/pfeic-19.2019.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenon that occurs among PBSI college student is that there are many students who are not skilled at speaking argumentatively. There are four abilities that must be done by someone so that the conversation's him argumentative, namely the ability to make opinions, compose evidence, reason, and be convincing. The problem that then arises in relation to the ability of students to speak argumentatively is how is the ability of students in (1) making of opinions ?, (2) compiling evidence ?, (3) doing reasoning ?, and (4) convincing? on the oral assessment. This research uses a qualitative approach. The instrument used to determine argumentative speaking ability is the observation sheet. Observations were carried out by three lecturers namely researchers and two other lecturers. The situation chosen is an oral assessment situation because it is more formal and natural. Data analysis was done by evaluative descriptive techniques and mixing analysis. The results of the study showed that in general the argumentative speaking abilities of college students on oral assessment were quite good with a value of 6.05. This value is obtained from the average value of the ability to make opinions 6.52, the value of the ability to compile evidence 5.76, the value of reasoning ability 6.15, and the value of convincing abilities 5.78. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that the learning program should better emphasize argumentative communicative aspects with improvements in all aspects of argumentative speaking.","PeriodicalId":411009,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (PFEIC 2019)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference (PFEIC 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/pfeic-19.2019.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The phenomenon that occurs among PBSI college student is that there are many students who are not skilled at speaking argumentatively. There are four abilities that must be done by someone so that the conversation's him argumentative, namely the ability to make opinions, compose evidence, reason, and be convincing. The problem that then arises in relation to the ability of students to speak argumentatively is how is the ability of students in (1) making of opinions ?, (2) compiling evidence ?, (3) doing reasoning ?, and (4) convincing? on the oral assessment. This research uses a qualitative approach. The instrument used to determine argumentative speaking ability is the observation sheet. Observations were carried out by three lecturers namely researchers and two other lecturers. The situation chosen is an oral assessment situation because it is more formal and natural. Data analysis was done by evaluative descriptive techniques and mixing analysis. The results of the study showed that in general the argumentative speaking abilities of college students on oral assessment were quite good with a value of 6.05. This value is obtained from the average value of the ability to make opinions 6.52, the value of the ability to compile evidence 5.76, the value of reasoning ability 6.15, and the value of convincing abilities 5.78. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that the learning program should better emphasize argumentative communicative aspects with improvements in all aspects of argumentative speaking.
2010年普沃克穆罕默德迪亚大学印尼语教育研究项目学生口语评估中的辩论能力
PBSI大学生中存在的现象是,有很多学生不擅长辩论。一个人必须具备四种能力,才能使谈话具有辩论性,即发表意见的能力、组织证据的能力、推理的能力和令人信服的能力。那么,与学生辩论能力相关的问题是,学生在(1)发表意见?(2)收集证据?(3)进行推理?(4)令人信服方面的能力如何?关于口头评估。本研究采用定性方法。判断辩论能力的工具是观察表。观察是由三位讲师进行的,即研究人员和另外两位讲师。选择的情景是口头评估情景,因为它更正式和自然。数据分析采用评价性描述技术和混合分析。研究结果表明,总体而言,大学生的议论文口语能力在口头评估中处于较好的水平,其值为6.05。该值由发表意见能力的平均值为6.52,整理证据能力的平均值为5.76,推理能力的平均值为6.15,说服能力的平均值为5.78得出。基于本研究的结果,我们建议学习计划应该更好地强调议论文交际方面,提高议论文说话的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信