Menneske og drømmemaskine. Posthumane myteskabelser om AI hos Amalie Smith

Joachim Aagaard Friis
{"title":"Menneske og drømmemaskine. Posthumane myteskabelser om AI hos Amalie Smith","authors":"Joachim Aagaard Friis","doi":"10.1080/00233609.2023.2238689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary In the present article, I analyse the process of making the artwork Machine Learning I II III (2018) by Danish artist Amalie Smith to examine how it conceptualizes a posthuman myth about computer vision and AI. Smith’s artwork investigates the phenomenon of computer vision through using a convolutional neural network to represent what this network is thought to “see”. The artwork is an aesthetic manifestation of the invisible operations of the machine learning algorithm in a form that is visible to humans, and thereby it engages aesthetic speculations about how computer vision works. The artist provides an insight into how machine learning algorithms interpret images in a way that is radically different from humans, but at the same time greatly affects human reality because of the algorithmic culture that permeates contemporary societies. I read Machine Learning I II III with posthuman thinkers Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway and N. Katherine Hayles to show how Smith imagines a co-creative relationship between human and technology that neglects a myth about “machine” and “human” as distinct and isolated categories; a myth where symbols, human and algorithmic intelligence, weaving, and written discourse intertwine to make the artwork. In this way, Machine Learning I II III moves towards a posthuman myth of computer vision and AI where it is impossible to unentangle human and technological forces.","PeriodicalId":164200,"journal":{"name":"Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00233609.2023.2238689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary In the present article, I analyse the process of making the artwork Machine Learning I II III (2018) by Danish artist Amalie Smith to examine how it conceptualizes a posthuman myth about computer vision and AI. Smith’s artwork investigates the phenomenon of computer vision through using a convolutional neural network to represent what this network is thought to “see”. The artwork is an aesthetic manifestation of the invisible operations of the machine learning algorithm in a form that is visible to humans, and thereby it engages aesthetic speculations about how computer vision works. The artist provides an insight into how machine learning algorithms interpret images in a way that is radically different from humans, but at the same time greatly affects human reality because of the algorithmic culture that permeates contemporary societies. I read Machine Learning I II III with posthuman thinkers Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway and N. Katherine Hayles to show how Smith imagines a co-creative relationship between human and technology that neglects a myth about “machine” and “human” as distinct and isolated categories; a myth where symbols, human and algorithmic intelligence, weaving, and written discourse intertwine to make the artwork. In this way, Machine Learning I II III moves towards a posthuman myth of computer vision and AI where it is impossible to unentangle human and technological forces.
在本文中,我分析了丹麦艺术家Amalie Smith的作品《机器学习III III》(2018)的创作过程,以研究它如何概念化关于计算机视觉和人工智能的后人类神话。史密斯的作品通过使用卷积神经网络来表示该网络被认为“看到”的东西,研究了计算机视觉现象。艺术品是机器学习算法以人类可见的形式进行无形操作的美学表现,因此它涉及关于计算机视觉如何工作的美学猜测。艺术家提供了机器学习算法如何以一种与人类截然不同的方式解释图像的见解,但同时由于渗透在当代社会中的算法文化,它极大地影响了人类的现实。我与后人类思想家Rosi Braidotti, Donna Haraway和N. Katherine Hayles一起阅读了《机器学习III III》,以展示史密斯如何想象人类与技术之间的共同创造关系,忽略了“机器”和“人类”作为不同和孤立类别的神话;在这个神话中,符号、人类和算法智能、编织和书面话语交织在一起,创造出艺术品。通过这种方式,《机器学习III III》走向了计算机视觉和人工智能的后人类神话,在这个神话中,人类和技术力量是不可能分离的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信