De-contextalize Literary Studies: Ontological Turn and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

S. Park
{"title":"De-contextalize Literary Studies: Ontological Turn and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein","authors":"S. Park","doi":"10.22344/fls.2023.89.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ontological turn challenges the humanistic studies which has been deeply immersed in linguistic turn. Graham Harman and Quentin Meillasoux, the representative thinkers, argue that thing/object/reality exist for itself, regardless of its contexts, relations, or co-relations. Harman says that literary critics should see how text/thing withstand its contexts and environment or even culture, and Meillasoux argues that reality is an absence of reason and we can get to it only by a narrative which is disconnected from every logic and predictable law. Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein can be read in terms of what these ontological thinkers say. The monster in the text is an excellent example of ‘thing itself.’ Its narrative is about disconnections and disruptions, exemplifying Meillasoux’s idea of “extro-science fiction.”","PeriodicalId":221681,"journal":{"name":"Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Literature Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Literature Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22344/fls.2023.89.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ontological turn challenges the humanistic studies which has been deeply immersed in linguistic turn. Graham Harman and Quentin Meillasoux, the representative thinkers, argue that thing/object/reality exist for itself, regardless of its contexts, relations, or co-relations. Harman says that literary critics should see how text/thing withstand its contexts and environment or even culture, and Meillasoux argues that reality is an absence of reason and we can get to it only by a narrative which is disconnected from every logic and predictable law. Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein can be read in terms of what these ontological thinkers say. The monster in the text is an excellent example of ‘thing itself.’ Its narrative is about disconnections and disruptions, exemplifying Meillasoux’s idea of “extro-science fiction.”
去语境化文学研究:本体论转向与玛丽·雪莱的《科学怪人》
本体论转向对深陷语言转向的人文主义研究提出了挑战。代表思想家Graham Harman和Quentin Meillasoux认为,事物/对象/现实是为自身而存在的,无论其背景、关系或共同关系如何。哈曼说,文学批评家应该看到文本/事物如何经受其语境、环境甚至文化的考验,梅拉苏认为,现实是缺乏理性的,我们只能通过一种与任何逻辑和可预测规律脱节的叙事来达到现实。玛丽·雪莱的《弗兰肯斯坦》可以通过这些本体论思想家的观点来解读。文本中的怪物是“事物本身”的绝佳例子。它的叙事是关于脱节和破坏的,体现了梅拉苏的“外向科幻小说”理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信