{"title":"Sovereign Wealth Funds’ Affiliation and Acquisition\nPremium: Evidence from the Asia-Pacific Region","authors":"A. Khalid, G. Rubbaniy, M. Rizwan, H. Chaudhry","doi":"10.35536/ljb.2019.v8.i1.a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to extend the signaling theory, by offering the buy-side\nsovereign wealth fund’s (SWF) affiliation as a signal of the acquisition premium.\nUsing the mergers and acquisitions (M&As) deals’ data from Asia-Pacific, over the\nperiod from 2000-2017, the results reveal that the effect of buy-side SWF’s affiliation,\non the acquisition premium of target firms is negative, and statistically significant\nin the North Asian region. Our cross-country analysis shows a negatively\nsignificant effect of the buy-side SWF’s affiliation on the acquisition premium in\nChina. The findings of our sectoral analysis report a significantly adverse effect of\nSWF’s affiliation on the acquisition premium in the energy and cyclical goods sector.\nThis suggests that the SWFs are likely to be more influential in M&As deals that are\nconducted in the strategic sectors. Our findings demonstrate that the buy-side\nSWF’s affiliation can be used as a signal of quality. That is to say that this affiliation\nincreases the bargaining power of buyers to reduce the acquisition premium for\ntargets. The findings are particularly important for the managers of firms managing\nSWFs’ investments, as they can negotiate better deals with the targets due to the\nmanagers’ affiliation with the SWFs.","PeriodicalId":439737,"journal":{"name":"Lahore Journal of Business","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lahore Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35536/ljb.2019.v8.i1.a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to extend the signaling theory, by offering the buy-side
sovereign wealth fund’s (SWF) affiliation as a signal of the acquisition premium.
Using the mergers and acquisitions (M&As) deals’ data from Asia-Pacific, over the
period from 2000-2017, the results reveal that the effect of buy-side SWF’s affiliation,
on the acquisition premium of target firms is negative, and statistically significant
in the North Asian region. Our cross-country analysis shows a negatively
significant effect of the buy-side SWF’s affiliation on the acquisition premium in
China. The findings of our sectoral analysis report a significantly adverse effect of
SWF’s affiliation on the acquisition premium in the energy and cyclical goods sector.
This suggests that the SWFs are likely to be more influential in M&As deals that are
conducted in the strategic sectors. Our findings demonstrate that the buy-side
SWF’s affiliation can be used as a signal of quality. That is to say that this affiliation
increases the bargaining power of buyers to reduce the acquisition premium for
targets. The findings are particularly important for the managers of firms managing
SWFs’ investments, as they can negotiate better deals with the targets due to the
managers’ affiliation with the SWFs.