Practical Implications On How Established Companies Innovate With Startups

A. Back, Tina Werro, Lukas Peter
{"title":"Practical Implications On How Established Companies Innovate With Startups","authors":"A. Back, Tina Werro, Lukas Peter","doi":"10.4018/ijrdis.2019070101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study addresses an important literature gap concerning open innovation and startups. The purpose of this article is to deliver tools and guidelines for innovation managers to support their decision-making when aspiring to openly innovate with startups. The study proposes five spectra that show the variance across different collaboration on the following parameters for analysis: 1) investment required; 2) risk level; 3) corporate control; 4) Startup support; 5) ecosystem leverage. The article arrives at a simple weighted decision matrix to be used as a decision-guiding tool in determining the best choice of a startup-collaboration option from a corporate perspective. The research builds on a framework of references to previous literature and follows an explorative approach based on field research and design science research.","PeriodicalId":202894,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of R&D Innovation Strategy","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of R&D Innovation Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijrdis.2019070101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The study addresses an important literature gap concerning open innovation and startups. The purpose of this article is to deliver tools and guidelines for innovation managers to support their decision-making when aspiring to openly innovate with startups. The study proposes five spectra that show the variance across different collaboration on the following parameters for analysis: 1) investment required; 2) risk level; 3) corporate control; 4) Startup support; 5) ecosystem leverage. The article arrives at a simple weighted decision matrix to be used as a decision-guiding tool in determining the best choice of a startup-collaboration option from a corporate perspective. The research builds on a framework of references to previous literature and follows an explorative approach based on field research and design science research.
关于成熟公司如何与初创公司一起创新的实际意义
该研究解决了开放式创新与创业相关的重要文献空白。本文的目的是为创新经理提供工具和指导方针,以支持他们在渴望与初创公司一起公开创新时做出决策。该研究提出了五个光谱,显示了不同合作对以下参数的方差分析:1)所需投资;2)风险等级;3)公司控制权;4)启动支持;5)生态系统杠杆。本文给出了一个简单的加权决策矩阵,作为决策指导工具,用于从企业的角度确定启动-协作选项的最佳选择。本研究建立在参考以往文献的框架上,并遵循基于实地调查和设计科学研究的探索性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信