George Younan, M. Andrews, U. Rangarajan, Danielle Eganhouse, R. Ahmed, T. Shaver
{"title":"Improved Pancreaticoduodenectomy Outcomes after Starting a Specialized Community Hospital Pancreatic Surgery Program","authors":"George Younan, M. Andrews, U. Rangarajan, Danielle Eganhouse, R. Ahmed, T. Shaver","doi":"10.52106/2766-3213.1011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent trends in centralization of pancreatic surgery happened as a response to improved outcomes in tertiary care institutions. The volume-outcome relationship is true for high volume hospitals and surgeons. Obstacles to patient travelling to high volume institutions and widespread quality care in community hospitals led to establishing a quality specialized pancreatic surgery program in the community. Methods: Two pancreatic surgery specialists relocated their program from a tertiary care center to a community hospital. Results of the first sixty-two pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy procedures were studied. Results: One hundred and seventeen pancreatic surgery cases were analyzed, sixty-two pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy cases were included. Patient demographics were not different in regard to the median age (67 vs. 62 years), gender (65 vs. 62% males), median BMI (26.2 vs. 26 kg/m2), or American Society of Anesthesiologists class, in between the two hospitals. There was a significant decrease in the operative time (350 vs. 281 minutes, p=0.0001), estimated blood loss (409 vs. 156 milliliters, p=0.003), and length of hospital stay (7.2 vs. 5.2 days, p=0.0001). Most patients were operated on for a diagnosis of malignancy (74.2%), and the R0 resection rate was better at the community hospital reaching 95.2%. Transfusions, delayed gastric emptying and leaks tended to be better at the community hospital but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: With dedicated institutional support and careful program design, complex procedures such as PD can be successfully relocated to the community where superior results can be achieved.","PeriodicalId":375458,"journal":{"name":"MEDICAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH: OPEN ACCESS","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH: OPEN ACCESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52106/2766-3213.1011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent trends in centralization of pancreatic surgery happened as a response to improved outcomes in tertiary care institutions. The volume-outcome relationship is true for high volume hospitals and surgeons. Obstacles to patient travelling to high volume institutions and widespread quality care in community hospitals led to establishing a quality specialized pancreatic surgery program in the community. Methods: Two pancreatic surgery specialists relocated their program from a tertiary care center to a community hospital. Results of the first sixty-two pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy procedures were studied. Results: One hundred and seventeen pancreatic surgery cases were analyzed, sixty-two pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy cases were included. Patient demographics were not different in regard to the median age (67 vs. 62 years), gender (65 vs. 62% males), median BMI (26.2 vs. 26 kg/m2), or American Society of Anesthesiologists class, in between the two hospitals. There was a significant decrease in the operative time (350 vs. 281 minutes, p=0.0001), estimated blood loss (409 vs. 156 milliliters, p=0.003), and length of hospital stay (7.2 vs. 5.2 days, p=0.0001). Most patients were operated on for a diagnosis of malignancy (74.2%), and the R0 resection rate was better at the community hospital reaching 95.2%. Transfusions, delayed gastric emptying and leaks tended to be better at the community hospital but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: With dedicated institutional support and careful program design, complex procedures such as PD can be successfully relocated to the community where superior results can be achieved.
背景:最近胰腺手术集中化的趋势是对三级医疗机构预后改善的回应。容量-结果关系适用于大容量医院和外科医生。患者前往高容量机构的障碍和社区医院广泛的高质量护理导致在社区建立高质量的专业胰腺手术项目。方法:两位胰腺外科专家将他们的项目从三级保健中心转移到社区医院。对前62例胰十二指肠切除术和全胰切除术的结果进行了研究。结果:分析了117例胰腺手术病例,其中胰十二指肠切除术和全胰切除术62例。两家医院的患者人口统计数据在中位年龄(67岁对62岁)、性别(65岁对62%男性)、中位BMI(26.2对26 kg/m2)或美国麻醉医师协会级别方面没有差异。手术时间(350 vs. 281分钟,p=0.0001)、估计失血量(409 vs. 156毫升,p=0.003)和住院时间(7.2 vs. 5.2天,p=0.0001)均显著减少。确诊为恶性肿瘤的患者以手术为主(74.2%),其中社区医院的R0切除率较好,为95.2%。输血、胃排空延迟和胃漏在社区医院往往更好,但没有达到统计学意义。结论:有了专门的机构支持和精心的方案设计,PD等复杂的程序可以成功地转移到社区,并取得更好的效果。