Comparison of the Effectiveness of AICA-WT Technique in Discriminating Vascular Dementia EEGs

N. Al-Qazzaz, S. Ali, S. A. Ahmad
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of AICA-WT Technique in Discriminating Vascular Dementia EEGs","authors":"N. Al-Qazzaz, S. Ali, S. A. Ahmad","doi":"10.1109/ICBAPS.2018.8527412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to select the optimal denoising technique that helps in discriminating dementia in the early stages and illustrating its degree of severity. In this paper, a comparative analysis of three denoising techniques, which are wavelet (WT), automatic independent component analysis (AICA) rejection, and automatic hybrid technique using independent component analysis and wavelet (AICA-WT), has been conducted to select the optimal denoising technique. Two approaches have been used to extract meaningful features these are Permutation entropy (PEn) and Higuchi's fractal dimension (FD) from Electroencephalography (EEG) dataset of 5 vascular dementia (VD) patients, 15 stroke-related patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 15 healthy subjects during working memory task (WMT). k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifier has been used. The results show that the AICA-WT denoising technique improved the kNN classification accuracy from 88.15% for WT and 89.26% for AICA rejection to 90.37%for AICA-WT denoising technique. These results suggest AICA-WT consistently improves the discrimination of VD, MCI patients and control normal subjects which are useful for dementia early detection.","PeriodicalId":103255,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd International Conference on BioSignal Analysis, Processing and Systems (ICBAPS)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd International Conference on BioSignal Analysis, Processing and Systems (ICBAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBAPS.2018.8527412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to select the optimal denoising technique that helps in discriminating dementia in the early stages and illustrating its degree of severity. In this paper, a comparative analysis of three denoising techniques, which are wavelet (WT), automatic independent component analysis (AICA) rejection, and automatic hybrid technique using independent component analysis and wavelet (AICA-WT), has been conducted to select the optimal denoising technique. Two approaches have been used to extract meaningful features these are Permutation entropy (PEn) and Higuchi's fractal dimension (FD) from Electroencephalography (EEG) dataset of 5 vascular dementia (VD) patients, 15 stroke-related patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 15 healthy subjects during working memory task (WMT). k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifier has been used. The results show that the AICA-WT denoising technique improved the kNN classification accuracy from 88.15% for WT and 89.26% for AICA rejection to 90.37%for AICA-WT denoising technique. These results suggest AICA-WT consistently improves the discrimination of VD, MCI patients and control normal subjects which are useful for dementia early detection.
AICA-WT技术鉴别血管性痴呆脑电图的有效性比较
本研究的目的是选择最佳的去噪技术,有助于在早期阶段辨别痴呆,并说明其严重程度。本文对小波(WT)、自动独立分量分析(AICA)抑制和独立分量分析与小波自动混合技术(AICA-WT)三种去噪技术进行了对比分析,以选择最优的去噪技术。利用排列熵(PEn)和Higuchi分形维数(FD)两种方法从5例血管性痴呆(VD)患者、15例脑卒中相关轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者和15例健康受试者的工作记忆任务(WMT)中提取有意义的特征。使用k近邻(kNN)分类器。结果表明,AICA-WT去噪技术将kNN分类准确率从WT的88.15%和AICA拒绝的89.26%提高到AICA-WT去噪技术的90.37%。这些结果表明,AICA-WT持续提高了VD、MCI患者和对照正常人的识别能力,有助于痴呆的早期发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信