Spectrum sharing: How much to give

Dileep Kumar, D. Manjunath, J. Nair
{"title":"Spectrum sharing: How much to give","authors":"Dileep Kumar, D. Manjunath, J. Nair","doi":"10.1109/COMSNETS.2016.7439962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spectrum holding per cellular telephony service provider in India is significantly lower than the world average. The spectrum is also severely fragmented across bands and the fragments also have different license conditions. Regulators in India have recently recognized that such spectrum fragmentation is a source of inefficiency for the service providers and have allowed sharing of spectrum among the providers. The genesis of this paper is this regulatory order and it has a three-fold objective. We first study an example spectrum allocation. By assuming GSM-like voice telephony service, we analyse the spectrum holding in one service area in some detail. Using simple calculations, we see that complete pooling of resources by the providers may not be stable-one provider may have a lower blocking probability if it does not form a coalition. This leads us to our second objective of developing analytically tractable partial sharing models where the providers do not pool all their resources. For a probabilistic spectrum sharing model, we analyse a simple system and obtain the partial sharing that will make the coalition stable and Pareto efficient. This model is then extended to a larger system and numerical results from the analytical model are used to obtain additional insights. We then consider a deterministic sharing model for which we also present a similar analysis for this system. We also show that the deterministic sharing system can be analysed via a suitably defined circuit multiplexed network that allows us to use Kelly's Erlang fixed point approximation which in turn provides economic insights. The final objective is to develop a game theoretic model for partial sharing. We provide a Nash bargaining framework for partial sharing. We also discuss some revenue sharing mechanisms when the providers' benefits from partial sharing are asymmetric.","PeriodicalId":185861,"journal":{"name":"2016 8th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 8th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS.2016.7439962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Spectrum holding per cellular telephony service provider in India is significantly lower than the world average. The spectrum is also severely fragmented across bands and the fragments also have different license conditions. Regulators in India have recently recognized that such spectrum fragmentation is a source of inefficiency for the service providers and have allowed sharing of spectrum among the providers. The genesis of this paper is this regulatory order and it has a three-fold objective. We first study an example spectrum allocation. By assuming GSM-like voice telephony service, we analyse the spectrum holding in one service area in some detail. Using simple calculations, we see that complete pooling of resources by the providers may not be stable-one provider may have a lower blocking probability if it does not form a coalition. This leads us to our second objective of developing analytically tractable partial sharing models where the providers do not pool all their resources. For a probabilistic spectrum sharing model, we analyse a simple system and obtain the partial sharing that will make the coalition stable and Pareto efficient. This model is then extended to a larger system and numerical results from the analytical model are used to obtain additional insights. We then consider a deterministic sharing model for which we also present a similar analysis for this system. We also show that the deterministic sharing system can be analysed via a suitably defined circuit multiplexed network that allows us to use Kelly's Erlang fixed point approximation which in turn provides economic insights. The final objective is to develop a game theoretic model for partial sharing. We provide a Nash bargaining framework for partial sharing. We also discuss some revenue sharing mechanisms when the providers' benefits from partial sharing are asymmetric.
频谱共享:给多少
印度每个移动电话服务提供商的频谱拥有量明显低于世界平均水平。频谱在频带之间也存在严重的碎片化,并且这些碎片具有不同的许可条件。印度的监管机构最近认识到,这种频谱碎片化是服务提供商效率低下的一个根源,并允许提供商之间共享频谱。本文的起源是这种监管秩序,它有三个目标。首先研究了一个频谱分配实例。通过假设类似gsm的语音电话业务,我们详细分析了一个业务区域的频谱占用情况。通过简单的计算,我们看到供应商的资源池可能不稳定——如果一个供应商不形成联盟,它可能有更低的阻塞概率。这就引出了我们的第二个目标,即开发可分析处理的部分共享模型,在这种模型中,提供者不会汇集所有资源。对于一个概率频谱共享模型,我们分析了一个简单的系统,得到了使联盟稳定和帕累托有效的部分共享。然后将该模型扩展到更大的系统,并使用分析模型的数值结果来获得额外的见解。然后,我们考虑一个确定性共享模型,我们也为这个系统提出了类似的分析。我们还表明,确定性共享系统可以通过适当定义的电路多路复用网络进行分析,该网络允许我们使用凯利的厄朗不动点近似,从而提供经济见解。最后的目标是建立一个部分共享的博弈论模型。我们提供了一个部分共享的纳什议价框架。我们还讨论了当供应商从部分共享中获得的收益不对称时的一些收益共享机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信